New ESPNU 100

  • 23 replies
  • 4356 views

kjd01067

  • *****
  • 1872
New ESPNU 100
« on: September 03, 2010, 07:34:28 PM »
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/recruiting/rankings

22    Jabari Brown
23    Jakarr Sampson
34    Quinn Cook
44    D'Angelo Harrison
53    Dom Pointer
60    Maurice Harkless 
66    Naadir Tharpe
94    Norvel Pelle

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2010, 08:33:16 PM »
Tyrone Johnson at 37?  Little high, no?
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2010, 09:15:45 PM »
No Kadeem Jack or Derrick Randall
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2010, 09:33:07 PM »
Questinable top 100.

Tyrone Johnson at #37 is way too high.

Norvel Pelle at #94 is a joke. That kid's body and athleticism alone put him in the top 50 if he couldn't dribble a basketball.

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2010, 12:28:49 PM »
Norvel Pelle at #94 is a joke. That kid's body and athleticism alone put him in the top 50 if he couldn't dribble a basketball.

He's an enigmatic prospect. I know their West Coast editor loved those aspects, but it's just that his lack of effort and consistency sends off red flags.

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2010, 03:07:26 AM »
a little surprised kadeem Jack not there too Dave.

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2010, 03:11:04 AM »
Tony Wrotten dropped down dramatically too. Guess cause he lost his junior year to injury.

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2010, 03:18:55 PM »
Tony Wrotten dropped down dramatically too. Guess cause he lost his junior year to injury.
He enjoyed major physical advantages over kids his own age, as a younger prospect. The other kids matured and, as one NY recruiting analyst put it, Wroten "rested on his laurels."

It's always interesting to see how the creme de la creme kids deal with initial success. Some let their guard down, while others, recognizing the target on their back, keep pushing themselves. Family and friends can have an effect through pushing, coddling, or supporting.

In terms of this one, it's a fair one. Personally, I would've moved up Levi Randolph, Rakeem Christmas, Josiah Turner, Pelle, Mikael Hopkins, and Tyler Adams, while moving down Mike Chandler, Marshall Plumlee, Gary Bell, and Bishop Daniels .

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2010, 03:21:01 PM »
a little surprised kadeem Jack not there too Dave.

I'm not a huge Jack fan but a little surprised at the disparity between Rivals and ESPN rankings. Also this class lacks big men so he naturally moves up a bit.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2010, 03:25:18 PM »
a little surprised kadeem Jack not there too Dave.

I'm not a huge Jack fan but a little surprised at the disparity between Rivals and ESPN rankings. Also this class lacks big men so he naturally moves up a bit.

Agreed.  I think Jack will settle in the 80-90 range before the last lists come out, but he has to be on there now.

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2010, 07:15:44 PM »
a little surprised kadeem Jack not there too Dave.

I'm not a huge Jack fan but a little surprised at the disparity between Rivals and ESPN rankings. Also this class lacks big men so he naturally moves up a bit.

Agreed.  I think Jack will settle in the 80-90 range before the last lists come out, but he has to be on there now.

I think Jack is very comparable to Pelle.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2010, 07:46:39 PM »
Isn't this his prep year?  Or did he leave Rice early?  If it's Jack's prep year then ESPN may not be considering him as 2011.
When you're a kid from New York and you do it in New York, that lasts forever!

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2010, 11:55:27 PM »
a little surprised kadeem Jack not there too Dave.

I'm not a huge Jack fan but a little surprised at the disparity between Rivals and ESPN rankings. Also this class lacks big men so he naturally moves up a bit.

Agreed.  I think Jack will settle in the 80-90 range before the last lists come out, but he has to be on there now.

I think Jack is very comparable to Pelle.

I can't agree with you there.  I think Pelle has a much higher ceiling and superior length and athleticism.

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #13 on: September 07, 2010, 12:06:18 AM »
a little surprised kadeem Jack not there too Dave.

I'm not a huge Jack fan but a little surprised at the disparity between Rivals and ESPN rankings. Also this class lacks big men so he naturally moves up a bit.

Agreed.  I think Jack will settle in the 80-90 range before the last lists come out, but he has to be on there now.

I think Jack is very comparable to Pelle.

I can't agree with you there.  I think Pelle has a much higher ceiling and superior length and athleticism.

Please tell me when and where you've seen Pelle?
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2010, 12:53:02 AM »
a little surprised kadeem Jack not there too Dave.

I'm not a huge Jack fan but a little surprised at the disparity between Rivals and ESPN rankings. Also this class lacks big men so he naturally moves up a bit.

Agreed.  I think Jack will settle in the 80-90 range before the last lists come out, but he has to be on there now.

I think Jack is very comparable to Pelle.

I can't agree with you there.  I think Pelle has a much higher ceiling and superior length and athleticism.

Please tell me when and where you've seen Pelle?

This is a really assanine post.  I'm about one more of these ridiculous responses from you from never posting on your site again.  What's with you lately?
I haven't seen him play in person.  I've seen plenty of tape on him and talked to and read writeups from people I trust.  I actually prefer seeing video of players to sitting in a crowded gym 150 feet away like I used to do all the time.

If we are only allowed to have opinions on players we've seen in person these boards would be awfully useless, no? 

FTR, I've never seen Michael Jordan play in person, but I am pretty confident he was a good player.  Also, I don't need to see much tape on a kid that can run up and down the floor like a SF and can touch the rim standing flat-footed. 
« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 12:58:18 AM by Marillac »

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2010, 01:53:47 AM »
I just asked you a question because you've been coming up with a lot of info lately. Not sure why you are flipping out. You are certainly entitled to your opinion. I was simply just wondering how you came to formulate your opinion. Thats fair, right?

Personally I can't judge the ceiling of a guy's potential off a mixtape but if you can more power to you. I know there is only about three 1 min clips of Pelle out on youtube so personally for someone who hasn't seen him play live I find it hard to really gauge a lot about him other than he's 6'8 and agile.

Anyways here is two videos on both Pelle and Jack. To me I think they look fairly comparable players.

KADEEM JACK HIGHLIGHTS G&GTV

Norvel Pelle - HardwoodElite.com

PS It's a shame you didn't get to see Jordan in person. Luckily I did and he dropped 30+ on the Nets. I also saw Lebron's first game at the Garden my freshman year at St. John's.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 02:01:41 AM by Dave »
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

peter

  • *****
  • 3551
    • Rumble in the Garden
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2010, 10:35:05 AM »
Fellas: Marillac, be easy.  I don't think Dave was calling you out.  If you have beef, take it to PM... but disagreements make conversation, so let's keep discussing the forwards here.

I think Pelle is more agile than Jack, who plays above the rim, but not to the extent that Pelle seems to.  But I haven't seen him for a whole game, and I can say I've seen Rice on TV.  And that's a good point. Jack looks awesome in his highlights but I swear that the couple of games that were shown last year (Rice/ Cardozo and the other one - I think Jack played in both?) there were stretches that I forgot he was there. 

Granted, I was watching Ryan Rhoomes b/c I thought he might be a realistic get, despite the presence of Nacleiro.

But Pelle looks effortless off the ground.  Like he doesn't even need a step to get up.

Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2010, 12:15:46 PM »
The couple of times I've seen Jack in person, he seems to be incredibly quick getting off the floor on defense.  He shows a natural instinct for blocking shots.  I don't think he is very polished offensively.  He kind of reminds me of Hamady N'Diaye.

peter

  • *****
  • 3551
    • Rumble in the Garden
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2010, 01:57:28 PM »
Man, when the college game started clicking for N'Diaye, he was so impressive. But he's a solid bit taller than Jack, and Kadeem won't be able to play like that in college.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: New ESPNU 100
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2010, 02:17:24 PM »
Man, when the college game started clicking for N'Diaye, he was so impressive. But he's a solid bit taller than Jack, and Kadeem won't be able to play like that in college.

You mean his senior year when it started clicking :)
Remember who broke the Slice news