Maybe I am just old fashion but can people please stop referring to Coach Lavin as"Lav", "Lavs" or any other shortened verson of his name. Its Coach or Coach Lavin.
Coach Lavin has worked long and hard to be a Division I head coach and has earned the respect of every fan out there to at least speak about him in the right manner. If you had the privledge of meeting the man, would you say "Hey Lavs, nice to meet you"?
Personally have no problem with "Lavs" - that IS what he was known as for a over a decade at UCLA, by players, fans, even broadcasters - both while as an assistant as well as head coach. That's how many of his ESPN peers referred to him during his 8 years out of coch - "Coach Lavs" or simply Lavs. To me it indicates a level of affection toward the coach from the person using the term.
I do have a problem with those that simply refer to him as "Lavin" - it just sounds disrespectful, as if the intent is to diminish the subject in some way. It's much the same way hearing reporters refer to simply "Clinton" or "Bush" or "Obama" when refering to one of the last 4 presidents grates on me. I think it's disrespectful to the Office, no matter what I may personally think of the person holding the office. But a basketball coach is a shade different than POTUS, so I have no problem with a reference to Lavs or Steve or for that matter seeing Looie referred to on these boards - Lavs = Okay. Steve/Looie = Okay. coach Lavin/coach Carnaseca = good. Lavin/Carnaseca = not so much....
That is also an excellent point CR, and reminds me of the infamous "Hey Knight" incident years back with Bob Knight. I think there's also a significant difference between speaking online about someone, and addressing a person to their face. I doubt any of us would say "what's up" to "Cashman", "Coughlin" or "Rex" ... the polite thing to do would of course be to say hello to Mr Cashman, Coach Ryan, Coach Woodson, Coach Coughlin etc. When speaking
to anyone you don't know, it's nice to use their title. But when speaking about them online? Eh, I can see why some would drop the title.
Nevertheless it's not a bad idea to be slightly more formal. And I agree with both PMG and CR that certain references can be offensive.
Again, not an epidemic or critical problem, but formality wouldn't kill some of us.