Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion

  • 386 replies
  • 19668 views

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #360 on: January 29, 2013, 12:06:12 PM »

Moose
Isn't that what these sites are about? The back and forth. Unfortunately we don't root for Duke, so we can't all come on here and  agree on how great everything is. As a rule I don't like to bash the players and I really have only done it to three guys and I least I try to do it in a fun way. Unless Dave, whoever runs Redmen and fun(HAAAAA) agree to outlaw bashing of players it is going to continue. Guys like Burrell(good player) and Harrison (shade under great player) have gotten bashed, so under those rules Greene is def fair game.

Hey Bff :)

I agree so not sure why your asking me
Remember who broke the Slice news

redslope

  • *****
  • 1823
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #361 on: January 29, 2013, 12:06:52 PM »
When Phil first arrived everyone agreedhe was a 4 year player.  His first development was changed in year one with the Nuri departure.  He is in year two and still learning to be a PG and he has an injury.  If you look at him as 4 year player, you would say year 2; comes off the bench and provides a lift to the team in his minutes but he is not playing that roll again given the 3 guard line up.  Coach's decision for fans to live with--and it has put us on  a 4 game win streak.  He still has 2 and 1/2 years to go and grow which we will see.  A leader as a senior.

Foad

  • *****
  • 6065
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #362 on: January 29, 2013, 12:07:14 PM »
Unless Dave, whoever runs Redmen and fun(HAAAAA) agree to outlaw bashing of players it is going to continue. Guys like Burrell(good player) and Harrison (shade under great player) have gotten bashed, so under those rules Greene is def fair game.

Ever the contrarian I'm considering banning anyone who says anything nice about anything.

The problem with Greene is that he plays too much. The problem with him playing too much is that he's being groomed to be the go to guard next year when Harrison's in Poland.

DFF6

  • *****
  • 1648
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #363 on: January 29, 2013, 12:10:43 PM »
Unless Dave, whoever runs Redmen and fun(HAAAAA) agree to outlaw bashing of players it is going to continue. Guys like Burrell(good player) and Harrison (shade under great player) have gotten bashed, so under those rules Greene is def fair game.

Ever the contrarian I'm considering banning anyone who says anything nice about anything.

The problem with Greene is that he plays too much. The problem with him playing too much is that he's being groomed to be the go to guard next year when Harrison's in Poland.

Exactly Fun/Foad!  Greene is/will be fine for what he is, a decent 2 guard that serves to compliment a well balanced team.  I doubt he will ever be the "man" for this team at the 2 spot the way Harrison has been.  And if Greene cannot be that guy for this team, his minutes should reflect that.

Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #364 on: January 29, 2013, 12:10:53 PM »
Hey Bff

I agree so not sure why your asking me


I was responding to your post. You did a fine job explaining why there is back and forth in regards to Greene. I was just stating if you take away that back and forth you would be left with is +1 posts. That is probably how the Duke and UNC boards look. At least on Kentucky boards you could debate how many years before they wind up on probation.

Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #365 on: January 29, 2013, 01:26:51 PM »
I respect the opinion of all my friends on the board and do not at all mind posts that bash my illegitimate son, Phil Greene, or any other player.  In fact, I rather enjoy the tete a tete.

I hope that the KIDS on the team do not read our foolishness as it might be difficult for them to take anything positive from it and not feel stung by the negative.

It appears to me that the team is moving in the direction of a point guard by commitee approach in which Sir Dom, 3'lo, Mean Joe and the Aggie all take turns bringing the ball up and having the ball primarily in their hands.  Especially, when Branch is off and the other 3 are on.

I'd expect this new dynamic to bring legions of fans to the exquisite, acquired taste that is Phil Greene.

Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #366 on: January 29, 2013, 01:52:11 PM »
I'd expect this new dynamic to bring legions of fans to the exquisite, acquired taste that is Phil Greene.


Some people like to attach jumper cables to their nips, so different strokes for different folks I guess

Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #367 on: January 29, 2013, 04:41:10 PM »
Allow me to weigh in on this Phil Greene debate.............ahh, I got nothing! ::) ???

Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #368 on: January 29, 2013, 09:22:59 PM »
Rock solid?

Yes, rock solid.  He's played 606 minutes with the ball in his hands a great deal and has only 27 turnovers. 0 turnovers past 2 games.  He's not a defensive minded center.  That's rock solid.
 
Quote
He does nothing with the ball..so nothing good nor bad happens

He lead the team in assists last year and is leading them again this year.  This is toooo easy.

Quote
comparing him with the Aggie is ridiculous...

Apparently you didn't watch the SH game.  That's Ok.  Just read the box score.  Who had the better game?  Go ahead.  You could say it.

Too easy?? I'm at the games...if you are, do you open your eyes?

Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #369 on: January 29, 2013, 09:28:27 PM »
I'm with Carmine on this.  I think people are getting carried away with the Phil Greene negative stuff.

Clearly he was slumping offensively lately.  But he is a solid player for SJU who is important whether coming off the bench or starting.

I also like the fact that Phil doesn't pout and doesn't carry on even when he is struggling.  In other words he is really good character guy on the team.  And the team has won 4 straight.

I don't understand why we need to be negative towards him or anyone at this point.
No...I happen to like him as a SG off the bench...but in no way is he a point guard

Tiznow

  • ****
  • 581
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #370 on: January 29, 2013, 09:48:54 PM »
I'm with Carmine on this.  I think people are getting carried away with the Phil Greene negative stuff.

Clearly he was slumping offensively lately.  But he is a solid player for SJU who is important whether coming off the bench or starting.

I also like the fact that Phil doesn't pout and doesn't carry on even when he is struggling.  In other words he is really good character guy on the team.  And the team has won 4 straight.

I don't understand why we need to be negative towards him or anyone at this point.

Why can't we critique a players game though.  Are people coming up with some nicknames and driving points home?  Yea.  But that is nothing different than anyone else that posts on these sites and drives home their points.  Same as those who rip Harrison and his attitude, Obekpa and his FT's, Branch and his TO's, Jones and his disappearance, Marco and his lack of foot speed, etc....

I am not against critquing players.  But to me the stuff about Phil has just been piling on lately especially considering they have won 4 in a row.

He was going thru a slump no doubt.  It happens and as others point out he is not a true point guard and he is not 100% healthy. 

That's all cut him some slack.  I mean do we really have to complain about him after a 10 point no turnover performance in which they won the game?

The problem is certain posters think Phil is the best think since sliced bread.  And if he gets thru a game with less than 2 turnovers and shoots above 35% without slipping on the ground he needs to be 1st team BE.  So they egg on those who call him Dribbles or the Human Circle and it ensues.  I'm the first one to say we don't need to compare him and Branch every game.  But if someone says the offense runs better thru Branch, the Greene machine doesn't need to start comparing numbers to numbers because like you said they have won 4 in a row.

Also he hasn't been healthy since NJIT.

Well I guess I don't read the baord that closely because I don't know people who think Phil is that good.  I do think he is the type of player who can paly major minutes on a good team that plays in the post season.  I like his stroke and his long arms can cause math up problems.  But he is also young and prone to slumps.

But again SJU has won 4 in a row.  I can't bring myself to complain about a lot at this point.  That's just me.

He is the perfect 6th man to me.  He looks slow but I'm sure his hip is seriously effecting that.  His tear drop in the lane is so sweet to watch.  He still can't keep a D honest from 3 and he takes good care of the ball, almost too good though.

He was the lowest ranked kid throw a ton of minutes and even more once Nuri left.  He is growing up too fast.   He needs to stay healthy and I think we would all be happier.

Moose, posters don't think about the fact they are slamming kids who play hurt.  Boothe played more than half a season with a partially torn tendon in his thumb while many posters enjoyed picking his games apart from the safety of their cubicles. 

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #371 on: January 29, 2013, 10:11:39 PM »
I'm with Carmine on this.  I think people are getting carried away with the Phil Greene negative stuff.

Clearly he was slumping offensively lately.  But he is a solid player for SJU who is important whether coming off the bench or starting.

I also like the fact that Phil doesn't pout and doesn't carry on even when he is struggling.  In other words he is really good character guy on the team.  And the team has won 4 straight.

I don't understand why we need to be negative towards him or anyone at this point.

Why can't we critique a players game though.  Are people coming up with some nicknames and driving points home?  Yea.  But that is nothing different than anyone else that posts on these sites and drives home their points.  Same as those who rip Harrison and his attitude, Obekpa and his FT's, Branch and his TO's, Jones and his disappearance, Marco and his lack of foot speed, etc....

I am not against critquing players.  But to me the stuff about Phil has just been piling on lately especially considering they have won 4 in a row.

He was going thru a slump no doubt.  It happens and as others point out he is not a true point guard and he is not 100% healthy. 

That's all cut him some slack.  I mean do we really have to complain about him after a 10 point no turnover performance in which they won the game?

The problem is certain posters think Phil is the best think since sliced bread.  And if he gets thru a game with less than 2 turnovers and shoots above 35% without slipping on the ground he needs to be 1st team BE.  So they egg on those who call him Dribbles or the Human Circle and it ensues.  I'm the first one to say we don't need to compare him and Branch every game.  But if someone says the offense runs better thru Branch, the Greene machine doesn't need to start comparing numbers to numbers because like you said they have won 4 in a row.

Also he hasn't been healthy since NJIT.

Well I guess I don't read the baord that closely because I don't know people who think Phil is that good.  I do think he is the type of player who can paly major minutes on a good team that plays in the post season.  I like his stroke and his long arms can cause math up problems.  But he is also young and prone to slumps.

But again SJU has won 4 in a row.  I can't bring myself to complain about a lot at this point.  That's just me.

He is the perfect 6th man to me.  He looks slow but I'm sure his hip is seriously effecting that.  His tear drop in the lane is so sweet to watch.  He still can't keep a D honest from 3 and he takes good care of the ball, almost too good though.

He was the lowest ranked kid throw a ton of minutes and even more once Nuri left.  He is growing up too fast.   He needs to stay healthy and I think we would all be happier.

Moose, posters don't think about the fact they are slamming kids who play hurt.  Boothe played more than half a season with a partially torn tendon in his thumb while many posters enjoyed picking his games apart from the safety of their cubicles. 

If I recall Boothe's injury didn't come out until after the year.  And Greene's injury really hasn't been in the media much.  Lavin and other coaches have said it at pregame receptions.  Heck Phil played all last yr with hand issue and it was never said till this year.  Can't get on posters who don't know about injuries. BUT also I think posters will lay off if they know something like that.

Phil has bad hip and most know that.  He just gets picked apart because when he is in the game you can go to the bathroom, get a beer and come back and he still hasnt moved from the top of the key
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #372 on: January 29, 2013, 10:39:47 PM »
Boothe's injury was public knowledge.  In fact, if I recall, he may have sat a game or two before he came back and played with it wrapped up.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #373 on: January 29, 2013, 10:57:31 PM »
Boothe's injury was public knowledge.  In fact, if I recall, he may have sat a game or two before he came back and played with it wrapped up.

I'll take your word for it.  I don't recall the specifics.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Tiznow

  • ****
  • 581
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #374 on: January 29, 2013, 11:02:24 PM »
He injured his thumb in the Marist game of the Holiday festival and played with a large wrap on it for a many games.

He never used it as an excuse, but it impacted his play.  I don't think SJU had a back up.

Many posters did not give a crap about the guy playing hurt and vented after each loss. 

It is the nature of these sports boards.  I think it is why Pitino referred to us as rats or something worse.

Tiznow

  • ****
  • 581
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #375 on: January 29, 2013, 11:03:56 PM »
Speaking of posters...if the Johnnies blow it tomorrow night what the chances that Linda will wake up and join us?

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #376 on: January 29, 2013, 11:04:44 PM »
He injured his thumb in the Marist game of the Holiday festival and played with a large wrap on it for a many games.

He never used it as an excuse, but it impacted his play.  I don't think SJU had a back up.

Many posters did not give a crap about the guy playing hurt and vented after each loss. 

It is the nature of these sports boards.  I think it is why Pitino referred to us as rats or something worse.


Most of the venting was probably coming from fans fed up with Norm.  Criticism is part of what they sign up for.  Overboard criticism no.  I don't think people have been harsh on Phil.
Remember who broke the Slice news

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #377 on: January 29, 2013, 11:05:04 PM »
Speaking of posters...if the Johnnies blow it tomorrow night what the chances that Linda will wake up and join us?

Does a bear shit in the woods
Remember who broke the Slice news

Tiznow

  • ****
  • 581
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #378 on: January 29, 2013, 11:17:13 PM »
Moose - sort of agree with you on the response on Greene.  Total agreement about the Bears and Linda.

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion
« Reply #379 on: January 29, 2013, 11:52:58 PM »
If we lose to those bums Linda has a right to complain