« previous next »
Pages: « 1 2 3 »   Go Down

Moe back in NYC

  • 52 replies
  • 5173 views
*

prjohnnies

  • *****
  • 2779
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2013, 10:23:43 AM »
Maybe, but unlike Cook's departure, the fact that Mo went as someone who no one thought would make the jump to the 15th selection overall no doubt has helped and will help Lavin and the staff with recruiting. 

I'd like to think that Cook and Hatten would have been a tourney team and done pretty well.  Had Artest stayed one more year, I think that team would have been a legit national title contender (I know we were ranked high, and were a legit top 10/15 team that year, but I think Artest would have put us into the top 3 or 4.
Logged
*

we are sju

  • *****
  • 5944
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2013, 10:26:13 AM »
Just to clarify, when I wrote "damaging" I meant as far as the next season's team on the court.
Logged
*

DFF6

  • *****
  • 1648
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2013, 10:44:05 AM »
Quote from: we are sju on January 30, 2013, 10:26:13 AM
Just to clarify, when I wrote "damaging" I meant as far as the next season's team on the court.

Got it.  On that basis, I agree with you.  With Moe this year, we're 3-5 wins better at this point. 
« Last Edit: January 30, 2013, 10:59:47 AM by DFF6 »
Logged
*

queensfinest

  • **
  • 232
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2013, 11:53:41 AM »

Got it.  On that basis, I agree with you.  With Moe this year, we're 3-5 wins better at this point. 
[/quote]


may be, but have to remember we probably dont have sampson if moe comes back
Logged
*

sju89tr

  • *****
  • 2499
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #24 on: January 30, 2013, 12:27:52 PM »
Quote from: queensfinest on January 30, 2013, 11:53:41 AM

Got it.  On that basis, I agree with you.  With Moe this year, we're 3-5 wins better at this point. 


may be, but have to remember we probably dont have sampson if moe comes back
[/quote

I am not so sure about that. Yes it was mentioned but those two were very close prior to the ineligibility but some have suggested Moe was turned off when he opened his recruitment.
Logged
*

we are sju

  • *****
  • 5944
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #25 on: January 30, 2013, 12:29:55 PM »
With or w/o Sampson I would have signed up for Harkless coming back!
Logged
*

Tha Kid

  • *****
  • 4662
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #26 on: January 30, 2013, 12:46:27 PM »
Quote from: we are sju on January 30, 2013, 08:46:51 AM
Most damaging early departures
1. Berry
2. Artest
3. Harkless
4. Cook
5. Barkley

Where, if anywhere, does Roshown McLeod fit in here if you include him (because he did depart early...)?
Logged
"I drink and I know things"
*

we are sju

  • *****
  • 5944
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #27 on: January 30, 2013, 12:49:39 PM »
Ty Grant and Zendon Hamilton, then Artest. Mcleod was probably better than Grant, but I liked Grant and with Mahoney coaching it wouldn't have mattered. It is amazing that we had that kind of talent. Mahoney could def recruit. Just not at the point.
Logged
*

Marco Baldi

  • *****
  • 20014
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #28 on: January 30, 2013, 02:01:58 PM »
Michael Porter
Logged
*

loughlinguy

  • ***
  • 278
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #29 on: January 30, 2013, 02:27:43 PM »
Billy Paultz desereves to be on that top 5 list of damaging early departures.
Logged
*

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2013, 10:31:18 PM »
“@Anil_L7: @STJ_Basketball Our man on the #Magic @moe_harkless has hs first Double-Double tonight #StjBB”
Logged
*

texasstj

  • **
  • 70
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #31 on: February 03, 2013, 04:33:52 AM »
19 pts and 14 rebs in 42 minutes. Good to see Moe getting some time and continuing to improve.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2013, 12:08:34 PM by texasstj »
Logged
*

Celtics11

  • *****
  • 5788
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2013, 12:51:47 AM »
Quote from: texasstj on February 03, 2013, 04:33:52 AM
19 pts and 14 rebs in 42 minutes. Good to see Moe getting some time and continuing to improve.
Boy we could sure use those 19 and 14!
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2013, 08:46:58 AM »
Quote from: we are sju on January 30, 2013, 12:49:39 PM
Ty Grant and Zendon Hamilton, then Artest. Mcleod was probably better than Grant, but I liked Grant and with Mahoney coaching it wouldn't have mattered. It is amazing that we had that kind of talent. Mahoney could def recruit. Just not at the point.

McLeod was a pussy. Mahoney him in the paint, and that sissy wanted to be a guard. Ty Grant was tough. He was raw as a young player, but he became a solid 4 year guy. And of the best rebounders we've ever had.
Logged
*

Celtics11

  • *****
  • 5788
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2013, 09:10:42 PM »
Was he a kitten on Duke when he became their best player and I believe averaged a double double or close to it. he would be the leading rebounder on this years team.
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #35 on: February 04, 2013, 09:26:57 PM »
Quote from: Celtics11 on February 04, 2013, 09:10:42 PM
Was he a kitten on Duke when he became their best player and I believe averaged a double double or close to it. he would be the leading rebounder on this years team.

He was never their best player. That's insane.
Logged
*

Celtics11

  • *****
  • 5788
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #36 on: February 04, 2013, 09:29:27 PM »
Quote from: Poison on February 04, 2013, 09:26:57 PM
Quote from: Celtics11 on February 04, 2013, 09:10:42 PM
Was he a kitten on Duke when he became their best player and I believe averaged a double double or close to it. he would be the leading rebounder on this years team.

He was never their best player. That's insane.
Well I am insane but go check-believe he averaged like 14 and 10 and was their leading scorer for a year and had some time in NBA. May have been when coach K had health issues and they had a few off years.
Logged
*

section3

  • ****
  • 809
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #37 on: February 04, 2013, 09:32:26 PM »
Quote from: Poison on February 04, 2013, 09:26:57 PM
Quote from: Celtics11 on February 04, 2013, 09:10:42 PM
Was he a kitten on Duke when he became their best player and I believe averaged a double double or close to it. he would be the leading rebounder on this years team.

He was never their best player. That's insane.

He was very talented and was very good at Duke.
Logged
*

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #38 on: February 04, 2013, 09:35:56 PM »
Quote from: section3 on February 04, 2013, 09:32:26 PM
Quote from: Poison on February 04, 2013, 09:26:57 PM
Quote from: Celtics11 on February 04, 2013, 09:10:42 PM
Was he a kitten on Duke when he became their best player and I believe averaged a double double or close to it. he would be the leading rebounder on this years team.

He was never their best player. That's insane.

He was very talented and was very good at Duke.

I always felt he should have gotten more time than Minlend. Just my opinion.
Logged
*

section3

  • ****
  • 809
Re: Moe back in NYC
« Reply #39 on: February 04, 2013, 09:38:55 PM »
Quote from: paultzman on February 04, 2013, 09:35:56 PM
Quote from: section3 on February 04, 2013, 09:32:26 PM
Quote from: Poison on February 04, 2013, 09:26:57 PM
Quote from: Celtics11 on February 04, 2013, 09:10:42 PM
Was he a kitten on Duke when he became their best player and I believe averaged a double double or close to it. he would be the leading rebounder on this years team.

He was never their best player. That's insane.

I liked him...never understod why he didnt get more time...as was the case with King under Jarvis

He was very talented and was very good at Duke.

I always felt he should have gotten more time than Minlend. Just my opinion.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 »   Go Up
« previous next »