NIT bracketology

  • 123 replies
  • 9425 views
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #60 on: March 17, 2013, 10:03:51 PM »
Having Harrison at the end of the season and now in the NIT would have been so much more interesting. At least we'd be able to go into battle with all our troops. Without Harrison I just don't see how any SJ fans can be confident.

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #61 on: March 17, 2013, 10:07:48 PM »
Having Harrison at the end of the season and now in the NIT would have been so much more interesting. At least we'd be able to go into battle with all our troops. Without Harrison I just don't see how any SJ fans can be confident.

I am not confident in as much as I see it as a small step towards being a consistent NCAA team.

MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #62 on: March 17, 2013, 10:13:20 PM »
Having Harrison at the end of the season and now in the NIT would have been so much more interesting. At least we'd be able to go into battle with all our troops. Without Harrison I just don't see how any SJ fans can be confident.

I am not confident in as much as I see it as a small step towards being a consistent NCAA team.

Getting our bench playing time is uber important carrying over to next year. Can't replicate this type of game experience for our guys including Balamou, Jones, Branch etc.  The more time against competition, the better.   

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #63 on: March 17, 2013, 10:15:30 PM »
Having Harrison at the end of the season and now in the NIT would have been so much more interesting. At least we'd be able to go into battle with all our troops. Without Harrison I just don't see how any SJ fans can be confident.

I am not confident in as much as I see it as a small step towards being a consistent NCAA team.

Getting our bench playing time is uber important carrying over to next year. Can't replicate this type of game experience for our guys including Balamou, Jones, Branch etc.  The more time against competition, the better.   

Speaking of which, anyone know if Balamou is healthy enough to play?

crgreen

  • *****
  • 2185
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #64 on: March 17, 2013, 10:20:37 PM »
Having Harrison at the end of the season and now in the NIT would have been so much more interesting. At least we'd be able to go into battle with all our troops. Without Harrison I just don't see how any SJ fans can be confident.

I am not confident in as much as I see it as a small step towards being a consistent NCAA team.

Getting our bench playing time is uber important carrying over to next year. Can't replicate this type of game experience for our guys including Balamou, Jones, Branch etc.  The more time against competition, the better.

Agree.  And postseason experience, even in the NIT is invaluable - especially with so many frosh and sophs, for when they ARE in the big dance.

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #65 on: March 17, 2013, 10:27:06 PM »
Sorry if I'm coming off as a negative nancy bringing the board down...that's honestly not my aim at all and is not inteneded. It has just been a very rough end to the season losing 7 of 8, Branch injured and still not the same, Lavin missing when we needed him most, and Harrison off the team.

MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #66 on: March 17, 2013, 10:35:58 PM »
Sorry if I'm coming off as a negative nancy bringing the board down...that's honestly not my aim at all and is not inteneded. It has just been a very rough end to the season losing 7 of 8, Branch injured and still not the same, Lavin missing when we needed him most, and Harrison off the team.

Nobody likes it.  Nobody is happy we gave up a possible NCAA bid because of Harrison and coach suspending him.  Only a few ways to improve the situation which are to continue to play in a tourney like the NIT and aim to play well.  We also need to bring Harrison back, and we need a better Harrison.  Lavs also needs to press to land Rysheed Jordan.  There will be a spot for him if he commits, I have no doubt whether it be Hooper as walk-on, etc.  I didn't want to play in the CBI, but this NIT field is actually quite competitive.  Need to take it seriously.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #67 on: March 17, 2013, 10:46:10 PM »
Can this team play more 20 minutes of basketball? Will they even care about this game? It is often the motivated team that wins the NIT game. Lavin got lucky getting into this tournament. He needs to make something of it.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2013, 10:47:20 PM by Poison »

Chilleb

  • *****
  • 1850
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #68 on: March 17, 2013, 10:55:51 PM »
I saw this team when they beat Xavier in the conference tournament, there legit. We better bring it.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2013, 10:56:09 PM by Chilleb »

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #69 on: March 17, 2013, 11:03:01 PM »
I saw this team when they beat Xavier in the conference tournament, there legit. We better bring it.

Yea, but they're an A10 team. They couldn't possibly be our equal. We are a Big East team, and we've beaten teams that a lowly A10 team couldn't dream of beating like Notre Dame.

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #70 on: March 17, 2013, 11:15:47 PM »
Carl Jones is going to give our guards fits. CJ Aiken can drill the 3, Halil is a load as well. Is this game a pick em?

Tiznow

  • ****
  • 581
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #71 on: March 17, 2013, 11:16:51 PM »
Sorry if I'm coming off as a negative nancy bringing the board down...that's honestly not my aim at all and is not inteneded. It has just been a very rough end to the season losing 7 of 8, Branch injured and still not the same, Lavin missing when we needed him most, and Harrison off the team.

Get a life

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #72 on: March 17, 2013, 11:22:29 PM »
Carl Jones is going to give our guards fits. CJ Aiken can drill the 3, Halil is a load as well. Is this game a pick em?

Def not. We had better f'n win.

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #73 on: March 17, 2013, 11:23:11 PM »
Carl Jones is going to give our guards fits. CJ Aiken can drill the 3, Halil is a load as well. Is this game a pick em?

Our?
They don't play for Ohio State
Remember who broke the Slice news

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #74 on: March 17, 2013, 11:24:17 PM »
Carl Jones is going to give our guards fits. CJ Aiken can drill the 3, Halil is a load as well. Is this game a pick em?

Our?
They don't play for Ohio State

Shouldn't you be running a NIT bracket or something?

Moose

  • *****
  • 12322
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #75 on: March 17, 2013, 11:26:32 PM »
Carl Jones is going to give our guards fits. CJ Aiken can drill the 3, Halil is a load as well. Is this game a pick em?

Our?
They don't play for Ohio State

Shouldn't you be running a NIT bracket or something?

That's your job. Was wondering if you planned on doing one

Look forward to winning the big one too
Remember who broke the Slice news

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #76 on: March 17, 2013, 11:28:54 PM »
How many rebounds is the guy who wasn't worth keeping going to have on Tuesday? 8? 10? 12? 14? 16?

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #77 on: March 17, 2013, 11:36:21 PM »
Sorry if I'm coming off as a negative nancy bringing the board down...that's honestly not my aim at all and is not inteneded. It has just been a very rough end to the season losing 7 of 8, Branch injured and still not the same, Lavin missing when we needed him most, and Harrison off the team.

Get a life

Nice attempt at trolling.

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #78 on: March 17, 2013, 11:43:46 PM »
They have a decent shot. Not a great shot, but it's a shot. I hope they come out and want it. Otherwise it will be a long offseason of complaining.

Re: NIT bracketology
« Reply #79 on: March 18, 2013, 01:12:02 AM »
Look at the bright side.  If at the beginning of the year you told me we would be in the same tourney as Kentucky and Baylor I would have been pumped!