Georgia Tech - Game Discussion

  • 158 replies
  • 10801 views
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #80 on: November 30, 2013, 03:16:15 PM »
The fact I have to comment about Hooper is a problem bc he shouldnt be on the court. get a lineup and stick with it. hooper starting is just unacceptable. what are you thinking as a coach at that point. jordan, harrison, dom, sanchez and obekpa...thats your lineup for the year, every game

Hooper has more points than Jakarr, Orlando,  dom, rysheed, and obkepa.combined
« Last Edit: November 30, 2013, 03:18:12 PM by Amaseinyourface2 »
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #81 on: November 30, 2013, 03:16:42 PM »
Hmm

@NYPost_Brazille: Picking up full court really got St. John's going. With so many athletic players on roster, Lavin may think about using strategy more.#sjubb

Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #82 on: November 30, 2013, 03:17:26 PM »
The fact I have to comment about Hooper is a problem bc he shouldnt be on the court. get a lineup and stick with it. hooper starting is just unacceptable. what are you thinking as a coach at that point. jordan, harrison, dom, sanchez and obekpa...thats your lineup for the year, every game

I do agree that we need to find a lineup and stick to it. I think max should get minutes regardless.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #83 on: November 30, 2013, 03:21:19 PM »
Hmm

@NYPost_Brazille: Picking up full court really got St. John's going. With so many athletic players on roster, Lavin may think about using strategy more.#sjubb

who would've thunk it. a team that cant shoot and is very athletic needs to use their strengths to win and not play to their weaknesses.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #84 on: November 30, 2013, 03:25:53 PM »
Wonder what was said at half to get Sampson untracked?

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #85 on: November 30, 2013, 03:33:08 PM »
How does last year's BE ROY get only  three shots. He is struggling, but does he ever get rock in good position? Man he would gave fared better at Kansas. He is stifled in this quagmire offense.

Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #86 on: November 30, 2013, 03:34:01 PM »
How does last year's BE ROY get only  three shots. He is struggling, but does he ever get rock in good position? Man he would gave fared better at Kansas. He is stifled in this quagmire offense.

Agree, when he's gotten the ball in good position he's been good.

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #87 on: November 30, 2013, 03:35:27 PM »
Not to beat a dead horse, but  Jakarr gets that dunk because Branch penetrated and drew two defenders...

goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #88 on: November 30, 2013, 03:35:51 PM »
Lavin sure does love calling timeouts after nice baskets that might give us a little momentum

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #89 on: November 30, 2013, 03:36:25 PM »
Really seems like our team doesn't care. Lavin has his work cut out for him.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #90 on: November 30, 2013, 03:37:27 PM »
Not to beat a dead horse, but  Jakarr gets that dunk because Branch penetrated and drew two defenders...

Absolutey. Have to live with his occasional lapses because he at least takes it to rack.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #91 on: November 30, 2013, 03:42:25 PM »
So tired of winning highlight reel, but losing game. Blocks, dunks with offensive stagnation and D lapses doesn't do it.

Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #92 on: November 30, 2013, 03:43:23 PM »
I wouldn't have taken Rysheed out. His defense on the perimeter is what's led to our stops.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #93 on: November 30, 2013, 03:43:50 PM »
So tired of winning highlight reel, but losing game. Blocks, dunks with offensive stagnation and D lapses doesn't do it.

Truer words have never been spoken.
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #94 on: November 30, 2013, 03:44:17 PM »
Don't want to speak too soon but it's finally starting to look like we showed up

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #95 on: November 30, 2013, 03:47:44 PM »
In view of new D regs, it is smart to penetrate and draw fouls. Branch is at least doing that.

Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #96 on: November 30, 2013, 03:49:36 PM »
That poor ref.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #97 on: November 30, 2013, 03:50:17 PM »
Fouls in our favor, 18-10, different from last night.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #98 on: November 30, 2013, 03:54:25 PM »
Give Desco a star for Branch penetrating and dishing!!

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Georgia Tech - Game Discussion
« Reply #99 on: November 30, 2013, 03:56:04 PM »
Give Desco a star for Branch penetrating and dishing!!

Like we keep saying though, he made a turnover in transition right after the nice dish to Obekpa.