The Board's disappointment with the team's won loss record is due to not understanding the implications of Lavin's optimistic perspective. When Lavin say's 'player X is the best shooter I have ever coached', we have to interpret it as meaning, 'the kid shot the ball well at practice today', but let's see how player X performs in the games. Lavin's optimistic perspective has the following benefits: 1) Supports player's and team's self confidence 2) 'I think I can' as opposed to 'I can't' and "fear of failure" will encourage the team to take chances and make things happen. 3) Supports recruiting as positive feedback is more inviting than criticism. 4) Kids are going to like a coach who tells the media, player x is the best shooter I have ever coached. If the players like the coach, they will more likely buy into the coach's plan. Every kid on that team, left high school or JC, thinking they were good enough to play every minute of every game and not one of them has complained about sharing their minutes with a teammate.
If Lavin blamed each loss on a player or two, we might think he was a good coach, but the kids would hate him. There would be more Nuri's and kids transferring ala - Rutgers and Mike Rice. Quickly, the board would criticize Lavin for throwing kids under the bus.
Lavin recruits good kids. He disciplines the kids when it is needed and consistently acts in each kid's best interest. The transformation of Dlo has been remarkable. Lavin's support for Rysheed during this year has been impressive. High school coaches and kids should see the evidence that Lavin is not afraid to put the needs of an individual over the needs of the team, when appropriate. He develops his players in all aspects of life. There is a life outside of basketball.
Turning the program around is not done in one season. If turning around a program was that easy, then NYU should win the NCAA tournament this year. St John's is lucky to have this guy!