Which team had the better players?
Norm's team was much more balanced. Hate to say it, but Norm did a better job recruiting than Lavin. Lavin's players had a much higher ceiling, but clearly hasn't reached their potential.
How many of these guys would have played 5 years ago: Harrison definitely and this year's version of Pointer, and maybe Obekpa and Jordan, depending on what day of the week it was. How many of Norm's guys would start on this team. Pretty much all of them. Hardy, Brownlee, Kennedy, and Horne, who's loads better than Greene. Boothe > Branch. Evans and Burrell > JDLR and Ablivicovitch. I think no contest.
The big problem is the two best players on that team were the 6th and 7th men under Norm. Have to give Lavin credit for Hardy / Brownlee. That was the best thing Lavin has done since he has been here.
Why don't people realize this? Several posters--myself included--were screaming for both of those guys to play more and have bigger roles. Let's be honest, Norm would have coached them to 18-19 wins, a losing Big East record, and an NIT.
Norm had 10 juniors and his highest ranked recruit and four year starter, Mase Jr., as a 5th year senior and that team was awful. They started off 2-8 in conference and finished 6-10. Last year was a complete disaster and Lavin started 0-5 in conference, but still finished 10-8 in conference.
Norm was terrible in every way. He was 15-65 in conference at Queens College. His successor, Peponakis (an SJU grad and good guy) after two years of rebuilding the mess Roberts left him, has won two NYCAC titles, had three bids to the ncaa d-2 tournament, and has a winning record.