Back to AA as a player. Did he really prove himself last year?
Last year he proved that he was every bit the free throw shooter Joey DL Rosa was.
35 percent from the floor, 23 percent from 3, 14 percent from the FT line. Yes, fourteen percent. Great screener though it goes without saying.
So as a freshman he proved he was awful. Maybe he gets better than that. How much better? Keep him, get rid of him, who cares. If Mullin can't recruit over a late spring recruit 14 percent FT shooter we're looking at a world of hurt.
He only took seven FTs all season--which might be a better gripe with his game than the % considering how many guys he personally sent to the line (and trainer's table). He's got good form, so there is no reason to think he wouldn't drastically improve with a bigger sampling.
I'm a little surprised you are down on him considering how hard he plays and how much you respect you have for Chris Mullin. I'd think Mullin would have a big impact on an athletically limited shooter with good passing ability and coordination. I'm sure we'll hear or read about it 50 times by tomorrow night, but Kamsinski only started two games his first two seasons at Wisconsin. Bigs just take longer.
Hey. Yes, I am down on him. First off, Lavin made terrible decisions with recruiting. I don't think many of Lavin's players are "safe." AA, should the new staff be down on him, is probably gonna get his best opportunity elsewhere. Mullin, who is trying to win, of course, may have better players in mind for spots, & he may not be willing to go the route where he languishes over guys who can barely get on the floor for nominal improvement.
I have great, great, great respect for Mullin, obviously. That said, everyone will play hard. Not an issue. And I agree with above sentiment, that Mullin wants "his guys" and the spot may be too valuable for AA. He might not be a D1 major guy.