Hey buddy I dont need your sarcastic remarks and neither does the board for that matter. Phil did not chuck up nonsense shots time after time to take us out of possessions time after time. I dont care if he average 30 points if his hustle is non-existent and he has a pattern of poor decisions with the ball and turnovers
Three points. First, I'm not your buddy. Second, my mastery of irony is universally admired, nearly. Third, you said Johnson's production "sucked," whereas his production was nearly identical to PG IV's, who you think doesn't. Now you say you don't care about his production, which is fine, but that's different from what you said before.
Part of production is the product that you put on the court which is hustle, work ethic, good decisions with the ball, and unselfishness. The box score does not need to be filled up to have an impact on your teammates in the game. Phil was a good player for us that happened to show effort every game and fought through many injuries that several people do not even know about it. And yes filling up the box-score was a nice cherry on top he had but by no means is that a requirement.
Johnson had a pattern throughout the season of chucking up horrible shots and not finding open teammates. He also had turnovers that really hurt us, and looked lazy at times. Yea he had some games he scored points but that is not reflective of productions as a whole player. He was not a good player for us and Phil was.
If I was a freshman on that team this year would have rather followed Felix's example and work ethic rather than Johnson or Ron's.