So mutombo played as a soph. Big deal
Well, you said he was damned good as freshman, whereas he didn't play, so I got confused. And he didn't contribute as a sophomore, so I got even more confused. Then I finally figured out that what you meant was that he was damned good as a 23 year old junior - which kind of illustrates the point that I was making, which was that big men take time to develop, especially those who haven't been "hooping" (that's what the kids call it) for very long, and that it was premature to pronounce judgment on Coker.
His 3 points and 3 rebounds would translate to 20 and 20 in today's college game.
Presumably the 13 and 7 Alonzo Mourning averaged that year would translate into 91 and 49. Good thing Nate Thurmond isn't playing nowadays, his 18 and 18 would be 126 and 126, which is impressive, even with inflation.
Welcome to the board stat man.
You can learn more about the game from watching it.
Are you the same Poison who thought Phil Waite was capable good for 10 and 10 in BE play last year? If so I'm certainly looking forward to studying at the feet of someone so learned.