Fordham - Game Thread

  • 140 replies
  • 9539 views
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #120 on: December 17, 2011, 03:49:59 PM »
this "run the clock" offense doesn't work with this team. These kids need to put the ball on the floor and score, score, score. THey don't know how to carefully handle the rock to "run clock" efficiently

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #121 on: December 17, 2011, 04:20:54 PM »
We win! I forgot what that felt like.

Sloppy, but whatever we needed it.

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #122 on: December 17, 2011, 04:21:37 PM »
Glad we won, Harkless had a big game, but it's so ugly...terrible execution in the 2nd half...

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #123 on: December 17, 2011, 04:22:03 PM »
honestly just happy we won the game
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

SJUFAN

  • *****
  • 2280
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #124 on: December 17, 2011, 04:22:12 PM »
You would think that with Nuri gone they would have to play Stith more. He hasn't played at all, guess the Stith experiment is officially over.

He sat the first half with academic violations.

Ok..thanks for clearing that up.

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #125 on: December 17, 2011, 04:23:31 PM »
Did not see game, but I am very happy to get the win.

Kids need it for the confidence

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #126 on: December 17, 2011, 04:23:47 PM »
I see alot of blowouts in the near future

SJUFAN

  • *****
  • 2280
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #127 on: December 17, 2011, 05:25:10 PM »
Glad we won, Harkless had a big game, but it's so ugly...terrible execution in the 2nd half...

Moe had a good first half, then I didn't even know he was on the floor in the 2nd half. If Moe can't assert himself in a five man rotation against Fordham, what is he going to do in the league? At this point, I just can't see him leaving after 2 years, especially after we bring in more scorers next year.

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #128 on: December 17, 2011, 05:30:07 PM »
Board needs some changes.
Parking only for NYCHA permit holders.

jr49

  • ****
  • 755
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #129 on: December 17, 2011, 05:32:31 PM »
I see alot of blowouts in the near future
Great post. You must be watching hoops a long time.

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #130 on: December 17, 2011, 05:33:25 PM »
I see alot of blowouts in the near future
Great post. You must be watching hoops a long time.

Going to be tough in Big East

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #131 on: December 17, 2011, 05:37:31 PM »

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #132 on: December 17, 2011, 05:55:11 PM »
No subs yet.  Any idea why Story hasn't come in?

I sent that post from my phone while at the game.  Just realized that auto-correct changed Stith to Story.

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #133 on: December 17, 2011, 05:58:55 PM »
That guy Jeff Short on Fordham is not an A10 player

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #134 on: December 17, 2011, 07:49:56 PM »
So... about that game today...


Anybody know what Stith did this week to get on Dunlap's bad side?     


boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #135 on: December 17, 2011, 07:51:17 PM »
So... about that game today...


Anybody know what Stith did this week to get on Dunlap's bad side?   

  It was something to do with academics , Desco

desco80

  • *****
  • 5072
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #136 on: December 17, 2011, 08:10:49 PM »
So... about that game today...


Anybody know what Stith did this week to get on Dunlap's bad side?   

  It was something to do with academics , Desco

Thanks Boo,
We play short-handed enough as it is, guys can't be missing halves because they have poor attendance at class, or were 5 minutes late for a bus trip.  We have such a slim margin for error.


boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #137 on: December 17, 2011, 08:16:21 PM »
  Is that right?  11,000 was the attendance?  Higher than expected. Great job.

Re: Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #138 on: December 17, 2011, 10:58:48 PM »
Not much good to take out of the game in the 2nd half. These kids were born to run baseline to baseline. Shorthanded is killing these kids till next year when we get more kids. This team absolutely wasn't made to take the air out of the ball.

Harkless rebounded like a madman today. In a year he is going to be scary good
« Last Edit: December 18, 2011, 01:48:08 AM by jumpinjohnny »

Re: Fordham - Game Thread
« Reply #139 on: December 18, 2011, 03:23:33 AM »
Where was our student fan support? Anyone else that expected more of an offensive game from Sir Dom? Saw him in one of those all star games against top comp and he had 20 pts on a wide variety of offensive moves. Seems very tentative on offensive end. Know his rep is on D end but still expected more O. Like him as a player though and believe his O will pick up over his St J's career.