Rutgers (Away) Game Discussion

Quote from: carmineabbatiello on January 29, 2013, 11:12:07 AM

Quote from: section3 on January 28, 2013, 08:28:16 PM

Rock solid?

Yes, rock solid.  He's played 606 minutes with the ball in his hands a great deal and has only 27 turnovers. 0 turnovers past 2 games.  He's not a defensive minded center.  That's rock solid.
 

Quote

He does nothing with the ball..so nothing good nor bad happens

He lead the team in assists last year and is leading them again this year.  This is toooo easy.

Quote

comparing him with the Aggie is ridiculous...

Apparently you didn't watch the SH game.  That's Ok.  Just read the box score.  Who had the better game?  Go ahead.  You could say it.

Too easy?? I'm at the games...if you are, do you open your eyes?

I'm at the games if my ankle bracelet monitor hasn't been tightened in a while and I can slip it off.  I open my eyes when I'm not on the nod.

Nice win but if I'm Mike Rice I call a midnight practice, reem out the players and throw a basketball at their heads. As for have we turned a corner-let's see how we handle success (3 game win streak) as we have 2 home games against lower eschelon BE teams that if we have turned a corner we should and have to beat although I think we can be susceptible to an upset. Someone close to the team used to tell me how even Norm's teams went into games over confident after having some success. Will be interesting to see how these 2 games play out. Will be there rooting us on-hope young Johnnies don't disappoint-can't keep chasing bad loses if we have any chance at the (and let me be the first to use the old cliche) BIG DANCE.

You want confidence. Confident good, cocky bad.

while many posters enjoyed picking his games apart from the safety of their cubicles

Most cubicles have scissors, staplers and the always present threat of paper cuts. I once saw a guy staple his finger, a couple feet more and he could have gotten his jugular.

So Boothe's lack of talent to play at a BE level was due to a booboo he had for a few games one season. Thanks, now I get it. Guess the 30 pt blow out losses to Cuse would have been 30 pt blow out wins if not for the booboo. PG4 plays 43 minutes and seems to be moving fine but he has a cripling injury? So when he infrequently does play well how do you explain it? If he was that debillitated we have enough depth to play him a lot less.

So Boothe's lack of talent to play at a BE level was due to a booboo he had for a few games one season. Thanks, now I get it. Guess the 30 pt blow out losses to Cuse would have been 30 pt blow out wins if not for the booboo. PG4 plays 43 minutes and seems to be moving fine but he has a cripling injury? So when he infrequently does play well how do you explain it? If he was that debillitated we have enough depth to play him a lot less.

Who are you directing this towards?

Quote from: Celtics11 on January 31, 2013, 07:27:42 PM

So Boothe's lack of talent to play at a BE level was due to a booboo he had for a few games one season. Thanks, now I get it. Guess the 30 pt blow out losses to Cuse would have been 30 pt blow out wins if not for the booboo. PG4 plays 43 minutes and seems to be moving fine but he has a cripling injury? So when he infrequently does play well how do you explain it? If he was that debillitated we have enough depth to play him a lot less.

Who are you directing this towards?

Replying to discussion of playing with injuries and to Boothe and Greene in prior posts.

Celtic, you miss the point.  The posts were not about Boothe's or Greene's abilities. 

But, while you bring it up, Boothe never played well with his "booboo".  That whole season was a bomb.

He earned his scholarship here before he was done.