Bucknell

  • 249 replies
  • 19398 views
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2013, 10:35:24 AM »
wagner did beat us back in the day when pj carlesimo coached them.

it's sad that our program has progressed so little that we're still worried about them and bucknell.

Per this from Rumble, they never beat us under PJ:

The two schools have played each other sporadically since 1935 and the Red Storm owns a 15-2 series advantage. Wagner last won against St. John’s in 1956.


They beat Alabama in the Lapchick Tournament under PJ, which was their last win over a ranked opponent until Pitt last year.  I think they also took us to overtime under PJ, but we won the game.  Think I read something about that once.

Also, to whomever was making out that list, Colombia is a third local team that has not beaten us the last 2 decades.  Other then that, none I can think of (if you don't consider NJIT or FDU to be local).

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2013, 02:30:15 PM »
@HoopsonFOX: Groovy and fashion-forward! RT @StJohnsRedStorm: @HoopsonFOX St. John's @UnderArmour Throwbacks! #SJUBB #BIGEASTNYE http://t.co/oZcAbnPYOa

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2013, 03:34:21 PM »
 Bad combo as Rothstein points out on twitter..

Bucknell shoots 47% from 3... combine that with our 3 point defense...

I really think this would be a solid, solid win for us early in the season.. I know, I know.. Coach makes a lot of $$, higher ranked recruits...blah blah blah.. That shit means nothing.   This will  be a tight, nailbiter...

 I will gladly be dead wrong with my prediction.. I hope I am.

Re: Bucknell
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2013, 03:44:39 PM »
I see where St. J is a 8 point favorite.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2013, 03:55:16 PM »
“@VinParise: More importantly... Bucknell as a team, turns it over less than 9 times per game, they shoot 45% from 3 pt land & shoot 80% from the FT Line”

MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2013, 04:17:35 PM »
“@VinParise: More importantly... Bucknell as a team, turns it over less than 9 times per game, they shoot 45% from 3 pt land & shoot 80% from the FT Line”

Our defense has improved since the Wisconsin game for sure.  Man-D was better by a ton against Wagner and the threes they made were pretty well contested IMO.  We shall see...  One can't look at numbers averages after just two games.  Bucknell doesn't have half-season worth of stats and haven't played against a team like SJU yet.

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2013, 04:21:28 PM »
“@VinParise: More importantly... Bucknell as a team, turns it over less than 9 times per game, they shoot 45% from 3 pt land & shoot 80% from the FT Line”

Our defense has improved since the Wisconsin game for sure.  Man-D was better by a ton against Wagner and the threes they made were pretty well contested IMO.  We shall see...  One can't look at numbers averages after just two games.  Bucknell doesn't have half-season worth of stats and haven't played against a team like SJU yet.

Didn't Bucknell play Stanford and Penn State?

MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #27 on: November 19, 2013, 04:23:12 PM »
“@VinParise: More importantly... Bucknell as a team, turns it over less than 9 times per game, they shoot 45% from 3 pt land & shoot 80% from the FT Line”

Our defense has improved since the Wisconsin game for sure.  Man-D was better by a ton against Wagner and the threes they made were pretty well contested IMO.  We shall see...  One can't look at numbers averages after just two games.  Bucknell doesn't have half-season worth of stats and haven't played against a team like SJU yet.

Didn't Bucknell play Stanford and Penn State?

Yes...  Neither team is close to as athletic as we are.

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #28 on: November 19, 2013, 04:25:10 PM »
“@VinParise: More importantly... Bucknell as a team, turns it over less than 9 times per game, they shoot 45% from 3 pt land & shoot 80% from the FT Line”

Our defense has improved since the Wisconsin game for sure.  Man-D was better by a ton against Wagner and the threes they made were pretty well contested IMO.  We shall see...  One can't look at numbers averages after just two games.  Bucknell doesn't have half-season worth of stats and haven't played against a team like SJU yet.

Agree it is small sample size. That said, our defensive awareness & intensity must be top shelf tonight. Also, avoiding dumb fouls is essential to keep the right guys on the floor and Bisons off the line. Like our chances, but  a challenging matchup.

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2013, 04:25:51 PM »
 In fairness, Wisconsin wasn't as athletic as us either... Not many teams will be for that matter..

MCNPA

  • *****
  • 5975
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #30 on: November 19, 2013, 04:30:41 PM »
In fairness, Wisconsin wasn't as athletic as us either... Not many teams will be for that matter..

Agree.  My point though was about our athleticism giving them a tough time.  Bucknell is good.  Not sure they are as good as Wisconsin.  We also didn't play our best game the first of the season.  We kept Wagner to 30% from 3 and they hit a few prayers to get to 30%.

thetruth8734

  • ****
  • 613
  • SJU Alum
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #31 on: November 19, 2013, 06:10:16 PM »
“@VinParise: More importantly... Bucknell as a team, turns it over less than 9 times per game, they shoot 45% from 3 pt land & shoot 80% from the FT Line”

A whole 3 game sample size...

Re: Bucknell
« Reply #32 on: November 19, 2013, 06:34:23 PM »
Bucknell is very good and very well coached. If they hit shots early and pack in the zone it can be a long night for the Johnnies.
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #33 on: November 19, 2013, 08:37:09 PM »
Lets Go!   

Need a good start

0404

  • *****
  • 1293
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #34 on: November 19, 2013, 08:42:05 PM »
CONTESTED MID-RANGE JUMPERS

WHY

WHY

WHY


OVER AND OVER

I DONT GET IT

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #35 on: November 19, 2013, 08:42:28 PM »
Pathetic defense. Settling for jumpers.. Terrible start..  They look much better than us.

Re: Bucknell
« Reply #36 on: November 19, 2013, 08:42:57 PM »
CONTESTED MID-RANGE JUMPERS

WHY

WHY

WHY


OVER AND OVER

I DONT GET IT

Im with you. And we cant seem to stay in front of anyone.

Re: Bucknell
« Reply #37 on: November 19, 2013, 08:43:55 PM »
Really need to improve this defense.

DFF6

  • *****
  • 1648
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #38 on: November 19, 2013, 08:44:40 PM »
They are just much more disciplined than us.  Efficient on both sides of the court.  We look like we have no clue, again.

boo3

  • *****
  • 6816
Re: Bucknell
« Reply #39 on: November 19, 2013, 08:44:46 PM »
 This is the man to man defense everyone wants us to play...