« previous next »
Pages: « 1 2 3 4   Go Down

Lovett (NEW)

  • 73 replies
  • 10600 views
*

Spruces2

  • **
  • 149
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #60 on: January 14, 2016, 07:56:09 PM »
Quote from: Moose on January 14, 2016, 01:37:16 PM
Baldi wasn't wrong. 

Things happen and things change. 

It will all come out in due time.  Most of you should probably be able to figure it out.  It isn't complicated.

Not going to sort through all the posts but recall some predicting his departure which turns out to be incorrect.

Frankly, i don't really care what the back story is as long as he is here and suits up next year. 
Logged
*

Snazzy

  • **
  • 79
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #61 on: January 14, 2016, 07:59:34 PM »
That Instagram post should make everyone's problems go away for a while
Logged
*

Poison

  • *****
  • 16896
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #62 on: January 14, 2016, 08:00:53 PM »
Logged
*

Marco Baldi

  • *****
  • 20014
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #63 on: January 14, 2016, 08:02:17 PM »
Logged
*

Celtics11

  • *****
  • 5789
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #64 on: January 14, 2016, 08:17:58 PM »
Logged
*

paultzman

  • *****
  • 16981
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #65 on: January 14, 2016, 09:01:24 PM »
Marcus LoVett isn't going anywhere, I'm told. Rumors of a potential transfer untrue. #sjubb
Zach B tweet
Logged
*

we are sju

  • *****
  • 5944
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #66 on: January 14, 2016, 09:30:48 PM »
Quote from: paultzman on January 14, 2016, 09:01:24 PM
Marcus LoVett isn't going anywhere, I'm told. Rumors of a potential transfer untrue. #sjubb
Zach B tweet

good news
Logged
*

Amaseinyourface2

  • *****
  • 8493
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #67 on: January 14, 2016, 09:34:09 PM »
This is huge for the program. Ill say this, if we could only have one of LoVett or Rawle I'd be taking LoVett. Thankfully its not this-or-that and our talented staff is hot on the trail.
Logged
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.
*

WillieG

  • ****
  • 537
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #68 on: January 14, 2016, 10:34:17 PM »
Most of you should probably be able to figure it out.  It isn't complicated.

All's well that ends well, but Moose, in truth, I still can't figure out exactly what happened.  You're a heck of a lot smarter then me.  Was he really planning on transferring, or did he just want that "feeling of being recruited" again, or was it just a completely false rumor?  And while we're on the subject of confusing behavior, if one wanted to cheat on ones wife, why would one make a video of it?  But there I go again, trying to apply logic to a situation.  I guess I'm easily confused. 

Irritating 48 hours.
Logged
*

JohnnyJungle

  • *****
  • 22663
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #69 on: January 14, 2016, 11:02:33 PM »
If you got a girl at school you've been dating all semester but getting no action. You go home for break and some girls start hitting you up saying you should get rid of your girl because they'll give you what you want..... Would ya think about it? Would you question things? Would you be tempted?
Logged
Follow Johnny Jungle on Twitter at @Johnny_Jungle
*

mjdinkins

  • *****
  • 5758
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #70 on: January 14, 2016, 11:12:09 PM »
Quote from: Dave on January 14, 2016, 11:02:33 PM
If you got a girl at school you've been dating all semester but getting no action. You go home for break and some girls start hitting you up saying you should get rid of your girl because they'll give you what you want..... Would ya think about it? Would you question things? Would you be tempted?

Actually, a poster whom I recently conversed with had the same theory.  That pretty girl probably turned out to be that ugly, arse Leprechaun.
Logged
*

WillieG

  • ****
  • 537
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #71 on: January 14, 2016, 11:20:17 PM »
Quote from: Dave on January 14, 2016, 11:02:33 PM
If you got a girl at school you've been dating all semester but getting no action. You go home for break and some girls start hitting you up saying you should get rid of your girl because they'll give you what you want..... Would ya think about it? Would you question things? Would you be tempted?
Being tempted is one thing.  Actually cheating is another. (Hines is married)  But to make a video of it? That's beyond crazy.

Now if you're talking about Lovett transferring: if another school contacted him in some way, that's a pretty serious violation.  That directly affects another member NCAA institution, and for that reason is treated very seriously. Also, Lovett can play here sooner then any other D1 school so nobody else can "give him what he wants" as quickly as STJ can. Who knows what really happened.  But, as I said, alls well that ends well.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2016, 11:25:33 PM by WillieG »
Logged
*

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #72 on: January 15, 2016, 02:22:01 AM »
Quote from: Dave on January 14, 2016, 11:02:33 PM
If you got a girl at school you've been dating all semester but getting no action. You go home for break and some girls start hitting you up saying you should get rid of your girl because they'll give you what you want..... Would ya think about it? Would you question things? Would you be tempted?

Who has better tits?
Logged
*

Spruces2

  • **
  • 149
Re: Lovett (NEW)
« Reply #73 on: January 15, 2016, 11:25:56 AM »
Quote from: Marillac on January 15, 2016, 02:22:01 AM
Quote from: Dave on January 14, 2016, 11:02:33 PM
If you got a girl at school you've been dating all semester but getting no action. You go home for break and some girls start hitting you up saying you should get rid of your girl because they'll give you what you want..... Would ya think about it? Would you question things? Would you be tempted?

Who has better tits?

That was funny...
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »