Grading the coaching staff

  • 127 replies
  • 9336 views
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #100 on: March 12, 2018, 01:39:29 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #101 on: March 12, 2018, 01:42:23 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.

I always get a kick out of posts where people take time out of their day to post that a particular topic is not worth anyone's time.

Foad

  • *****
  • 6065
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #102 on: March 12, 2018, 01:55:36 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.

I always get a kick out of posts where people take time out of their day to post that a particular topic is not worth anyone's time.

Especially a guy who posts half a dozen times a day about the two year plan.

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #103 on: March 12, 2018, 02:09:08 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.

I always get a kick out of posts where people take time out of their day to post that a particular topic is not worth anyone's time.

Especially a guy who posts half a dozen times a day about the two year plan.

+1

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #104 on: March 12, 2018, 02:15:50 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.

I always get a kick out of posts where people take time out of their day to post that a particular topic is not worth anyone's time.

Especially a guy who posts half a dozen times a day about the two year plan.

Oh yeah that makes sense...

Maybe I'll bring up Lavin 2000 times as opposed to something that is actually happening and is actually what the staff and administration are actually talking about.

No wait let's talk about hand shake line in a game that occurred 4 days ago that no one at SJU or anyone else cares about or is talking about because it serves the purpose of preparing SJU for next season...

Foad

  • *****
  • 6065
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #105 on: March 12, 2018, 02:56:16 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.

I always get a kick out of posts where people take time out of their day to post that a particular topic is not worth anyone's time.

Especially a guy who posts half a dozen times a day about the two year plan.

Oh yeah that makes sense...

Maybe I'll bring up Lavin 2000 times as opposed to something that is actually happening and is actually what the staff and administration are actually talking about.

No wait let's talk about hand shake line in a game that occurred 4 days ago that no one at SJU or anyone else cares about or is talking about because it serves the purpose of preparing SJU for next season...

I have an idea junior Jimmy Olsen. How about I talk about what I find interesting and you talk about what you find interesting, even if it's that people shouldn't talk about what you don't find interesting, no matter how boring what you find interesting is.   

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #106 on: March 12, 2018, 03:17:17 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.
Agree.
That’s what happens without a post season.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #107 on: March 12, 2018, 11:21:50 PM »
The only people who are talking about this still or apparently even care about this are a handful people on this board.

To say many of you waste your time discussing nonsense would be an understatement.

I always get a kick out of posts where people take time out of their day to post that a particular topic is not worth anyone's time.

Especially a guy who posts half a dozen times a day about the two year plan.

Hahahaha

pmg911

  • *****
  • 4073
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #108 on: March 13, 2018, 01:56:49 PM »
coach 1
Year 1: 10 - 18
Year 2: 9 - 18
Year 3: 12- 15
Year 4: 19- 12
Year 5, 6 & 7 they made NIT & NCAA 2x

coach 2
Year 1: 17 - 13 (with former coaches players)
Year 2: 10- 17
Year 3: 11- 17
Year 4: 24 - 10 - NCAA Tournament

After the 10 - 2 start, I really thought the team would make a run at the Tourney this year but the situation with Lovett screwed that up. I would be more critical if the team collapsed with a full roster but losing 14ppg was impossible for this team to overcome at first. I love the character the group showed and it will only make them better next year and moving forward.

If they don't take massive step forward next year, it will become an ugly situation...

coach 1: Coach K
coach 2: Jay Wright
(even some of the best in the country struggled at some point)

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #109 on: March 13, 2018, 02:37:31 PM »
coach 1
Year 1: 10 - 18
Year 2: 9 - 18
Year 3: 12- 15
Year 4: 19- 12
Year 5, 6 & 7 they made NIT & NCAA 2x

coach 2
Year 1: 17 - 13 (with former coaches players)
Year 2: 10- 17
Year 3: 11- 17
Year 4: 24 - 10 - NCAA Tournament

After the 10 - 2 start, I really thought the team would make a run at the Tourney this year but the situation with Lovett screwed that up. I would be more critical if the team collapsed with a full roster but losing 14ppg was impossible for this team to overcome at first. I love the character the group showed and it will only make them better next year and moving forward.

If they don't take massive step forward next year, it will become an ugly situation...

coach 1: Coach K
coach 2: Jay Wright
(even some of the best in the country struggled at some point)

And Mullin is taking on everything without prior coaching or recruiting experience. He's gained a decade's worth of experience with kids in just three year from Lovett, the tranny kid, Sid, Brooks, etc.   

The one worry I have is that he was using Lovett as a SG when he had him (only 1.7 assists). I mean, c'mon man, Lovett and Ponds should have had exclusive PG duties.

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #110 on: March 13, 2018, 03:55:25 PM »
coach 1
Year 1: 10 - 18
Year 2: 9 - 18
Year 3: 12- 15
Year 4: 19- 12
Year 5, 6 & 7 they made NIT & NCAA 2x

coach 2
Year 1: 17 - 13 (with former coaches players)
Year 2: 10- 17
Year 3: 11- 17
Year 4: 24 - 10 - NCAA Tournament

After the 10 - 2 start, I really thought the team would make a run at the Tourney this year but the situation with Lovett screwed that up. I would be more critical if the team collapsed with a full roster but losing 14ppg was impossible for this team to overcome at first. I love the character the group showed and it will only make them better next year and moving forward.

If they don't take massive step forward next year, it will become an ugly situation...

coach 1: Coach K
coach 2: Jay Wright
(even some of the best in the country struggled at some point)

And Mullin is taking on everything without prior coaching or recruiting experience. He's gained a decade's worth of experience with kids in just three year from Lovett, the tranny kid, Sid, Brooks, etc.   

The one worry I have is that he was using Lovett as a SG when he had him (only 1.7 assists). I mean, c'mon man, Lovett and Ponds should have had exclusive PG duties.

Lovett was the clear pg last year. Seemed this year he wanted to showcase ponds there and have Lovett just worry about scoring.  Maybe that had something to do with him not returning
*wipes ketchup from his eyes* - I guess Heinz sight isn’t 20/20.

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #111 on: March 13, 2018, 05:01:59 PM »
Lovett would have had the ball plenty in Big East play.  That in my view had nothing to do with his departure.  I think the idea was that, at times, Simon would bring the ball up to start the offense and allow those guys to start off-the-ball to get in the offensive sets, but ultimately Lovett and Ponds would dominate the rock as they did in early games (like Nebraska).

QuanMan

  • *****
  • 1744
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #112 on: March 24, 2018, 01:54:46 PM »
If Matt isn't in Glens Falls this wknd, where is he?  He's recruiting RJ Davis, there better be a good excuse for this-

Varsity Insider

Verified account
 
@lohudinsider
 19h19 hours ago
More
Varsity Insider Retweeted Varsity Insider
Here are the colleges here tonight:

Illinois
Maryland
Manhattan
Fordham
Niagara
Drexel
Robert Morris
Cal
Iona
George Washington
Dayton
UMass
Holy Cross
Colgate
Siena
Monmouth
Albany
Vermont
Quinnipiac
Providence
Section 3
Section 116

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #113 on: March 24, 2018, 02:21:19 PM »
Spring football scrimmages going on today. Prob out looking for an undersized tight end.

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #114 on: March 24, 2018, 02:23:17 PM »
Spring football scrimmages going on today. Prob out looking for an undersized tight end.

Or a tranny

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #115 on: March 24, 2018, 07:35:39 PM »
What's the deal with the transvestite recruit?  Is there an article out there about this?

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #116 on: March 24, 2018, 07:42:49 PM »
What's the deal with the transvestite recruit?  Is there an article out there about this?
He's coming to St. John's. He is the real reason Owens and his father want him to transfer as Chris announced the two would be rooming together.

isham

  • **
  • 77
Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #117 on: March 24, 2018, 07:46:56 PM »
Where is Chris Mullin?   If people said Lavin was lazy how would you describe Mullin's recruiting efforts.

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #118 on: March 24, 2018, 07:49:36 PM »
Where is Chris Mullin?   If people said Lavin was lazy how would you describe Mullin's recruiting efforts.
Lavlovian.

Re: Grading the coaching staff
« Reply #119 on: March 24, 2018, 07:57:45 PM »
Quote from: carmineabbatiello
link=topic=10899.msg293930#msg293930 date=1521934539
What's the deal with the transvestite recruit?  Is there an article out there about this?
He's coming to St. John's. He is the real reason Owens and his father want him to transfer as Chris announced the two would be rooming together.

All jokes a side. Is there a tranny recruit coming? I just laughed for an hour!  No clue why this amuses me.
Attack basketball, pressure defense, 40 minutes of hell ... Early on it might be 30 minutes of hell, then 10 minutes of what the hell are you doing?"