If he would have posted 11-15 I wouldn't have replied. But 20 to open!!!! We're 12-0 and beat them last season.
The two things you cited, our record and last year's result mean absolutely ZERO to what the line would be.
Guys who have huge liabilities to bad spreads aren't fooled by our 12-0 record. In fact nobody is. That's why we'll be about 18 point dogs to Duke and why we'll be small underdogs against 9-3 Seton Hall next week.
How does beating them last year matter one iota to what the point spread would be this year when they pretty much have a completely new team. Let's look at Duke's players this year and see how many minutes they played in the game vs St. John's last year:
Zion Williamson - 0 Minutes
RJ Barrett - 0 Minutes
Cam Reddish - 0 Minutes
Tre Jones - 0 Minutes
Jack White - 8 Minutes
Marques Bolden - 10 Minutes
Javin DeLaurier - 2 Minutes
Alex O'Connell - 0 Minutes
So current Duke players played 10% of the minutes against us last year, yet somehow the result that game should matter when determining the spread for this year's game. That is idiocy in it's purest form folks.
It really is amazing how you say something dumber with each passing post. I have to tip my hat to you there