Georgetown 2/2

  • 258 replies
  • 13382 views

TONYD3

  • *****
  • 5578
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #100 on: February 02, 2020, 03:53:59 PM »
Despite SJ blowing a 17-point second half lead on national television to drop to 2-8 I give the coaching a solid 7.
That’s the second time you did that. Not exactly shocking news.

Johnny23

  • *****
  • 3277
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #101 on: February 02, 2020, 03:54:13 PM »
I’ve never seen such poor execution down the stretch at this level.

Whatever the players do or don’t do falls completely on them. Anderson has no plan. No clue. He does nothing to free up any of his players or help in any way.

His “plan” with 3 seconds on the shot clock is to inbounds it to a stationary LJ and let him just figure it out? And that was one we actually made.

Holy sh*t.

Yeah because Anderson is telling LJ to throw up off balance wild shots from 20 feet down the stretch. Luckily one of them went in. GTFO here with that crap.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #102 on: February 02, 2020, 03:54:21 PM »
Players got the lead and lost it. I would have liked to see Rutherford play more. Anderson isn’t perfect...but he’s better than Mullin.

You are such a tool!!!!! Lololol

Wipe the sh*t off your face and just admit you were wrong. Is that really so hard for you to do?

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #103 on: February 02, 2020, 03:55:53 PM »
Yeah because Anderson is telling LJ to throw up off balance wild shots from 20 feet down the stretch. Luckily one of them went in. GTFO here with that crap.

He’s not telling him anything, dummy. That’s the problem. How badly do you struggle with reading comprehension to get that out of what I wrote?!

SJUFAN

  • *****
  • 2280
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #104 on: February 02, 2020, 03:58:02 PM »
We were down one.

We were up one when we held the ball. We missed then GT got the ball back with 20 sec left.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #105 on: February 02, 2020, 03:58:21 PM »
Even Tony D is leaving the squad. Poison too.

So we’re down to Johnny23 and SJUFAn (probably the same guy and formerly Old Red..Dave can you confirm this?).

I give the BannerMountain kid a break since he’s related to Anderson.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2020, 03:58:51 PM by Marillac »

SJUFAN

  • *****
  • 2280
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #106 on: February 02, 2020, 03:59:13 PM »
You are such a tool!!!!! Lololol

Wipe the sh*t off your face and just admit you were wrong. Is that really so hard for you to do?

Wrong about what exactly?

Johnny23

  • *****
  • 3277
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #107 on: February 02, 2020, 04:00:31 PM »
We were up one when we held the ball. We missed then GT got the ball back with 20 sec left.

No, my post was after Gtown had already taken the lead.

SJUFAN

  • *****
  • 2280
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #108 on: February 02, 2020, 04:00:40 PM »
He’s not telling him anything, dummy. That’s the problem. How badly do you struggle with reading comprehension to get that out of what I wrote?!

Yeah you know exactly what is or isn’t being discussed...troll

Foad

  • *****
  • 6065
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #109 on: February 02, 2020, 04:01:46 PM »
Anderson isn’t perfect

He's eight games below perfect.

Quote
he’s better than Mullin.

And there it is.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #110 on: February 02, 2020, 04:06:39 PM »
Yeah you know exactly what is or isn’t being discussed...troll

They didn’t run a play you dope. Everyone can see that. I’m giving Anderson the benefit of the doubt that he didn’t design a running laser shot off the backboard off an inbound to a stationary player. Because that would actually be even worse.

What scenario is okay for you there?


nudginator59

  • *****
  • 1437
  • It's better to be a Smart ass then a Dumb shart
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #111 on: February 02, 2020, 04:09:20 PM »
Up 17 on a crucial home stand, and blow to have an ending as that. SJU falls to 0-2 on the home stand...

That falls on coaching first.
Cougar O' Malley

Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #112 on: February 02, 2020, 04:11:39 PM »
The problem I have is it’s never about winning basketball games! The Board got called out by Repole, the only hire that should’ve been accepted after this was Pitino. Again, they have no plan. If Anderson pressed all game every game and we lost I could deal. He is Norm 2.0 that is it. Can’t wait to hire another former player or TV guy in 2 yrs. 🤦‍♂️

SJUFAN

  • *****
  • 2280
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #113 on: February 02, 2020, 04:15:25 PM »
They didn’t run a play you dope. Everyone can see that. I’m giving Anderson the benefit of the doubt that he didn’t design a running laser shot off the backboard off an inbound to a stationary player. Because that would actually be even worse.

What scenario is okay for you there?

They did run a play. It was to get LJ the ball. Whether he made or missed it, the play was successful because it achieved its goal. Could a better play have been designed? Sure. But that particular play didn’t cost us the game.

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #114 on: February 02, 2020, 04:17:35 PM »
We were up 1 with 45-50 seconds. Anderson had Dunn hold the ball until the end of the shotclock. How does that make any sense to anyone? Gtown was going to get the ball back with plenty of time to run a good play and even rebound a miss or two regardless of what we did.

Dunn shoots 38%. He averages over two turnovers a game. So your looking at almost a 70% chance of failure under good circumstances calling by his #. He doesn’t pass the ball in those situations unless he’s stuck and then it’s too late.

I’d imagine that running the clock down to nothing and forcing him to make a play would only increase the chance of failure.

But it was the talent, right? Up 17 in the second half against a team with 6 scholarship players and we lost because of talent?

Marillac

  • *****
  • 11224
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #115 on: February 02, 2020, 04:19:28 PM »
They did run a play. It was to get LJ the ball. Whether he made or missed it, the play was successful because it achieved its goal. Could a better play have been designed? Sure. But that particular play didn’t cost us the game.

And now you are blocked.

Dave, can we get Old Red off this forum? He offers absolutely nothing. I’m one of the last people to ask for censorship, but this is just ridiculous.

Foad

  • *****
  • 6065
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #116 on: February 02, 2020, 04:24:31 PM »
They did run a play. It was to get LJ the ball. Whether he made or missed it, the play was successful because it achieved its goal.

So if you run a play and the play results in a missed shot the play is successful.

You're out of your mind.


goredmen

  • *****
  • 5066
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #117 on: February 02, 2020, 04:28:52 PM »
Decent chance this team is going to have to win 2 games in the BET to keep Anderson's streak alive. And if that's the case then RIP

Foad

  • *****
  • 6065
Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #118 on: February 02, 2020, 04:30:53 PM »
Decent chance this team is going to have to win 2 games in the BET to keep Anderson's streak alive. And if that's the case then RIP

Hater.

Re: Georgetown 2/2
« Reply #119 on: February 02, 2020, 04:43:24 PM »
I got sucked back in when we beat Arizona and WV. Anderson is going bring physical athletic guys who can’t play, the next few yrs. We’ll probably make NIT or 2 and he will be gone. Thank You Board of Directors!