We were 1-17 in conference. There isn't a poster on this board who could have done worse. Let's get an x and o guy here pronto.
Please name three X and O guys who could have significantly improved that 1-17 record.
No one would have won more than a game or so more with this team which would not prove Mullin's coaching acumen one way or another. You simply can't judge anyone under these circumstances on wins and losses. Honestly people are getting caught up on what we win next year and I don't even think that matters. If we win 12 games but we are competitive and start to develop an offense and the new guys show they belong and the sophs show improvement would that be a disappointment? Absolutely not.
I would like to see Mullin own this thing and not look like he is observing from afar. If that happens I don't care what record is becuase we will be fine.
We'll know by January 15th whether this experiment is a failure. Judging by last year was like trying to decide if Julia Child could teach a cooking class after tasting a souffle she made out of mud, pus and moldy bread.
I know you disagree but I just want him to look engaged. If he does that and Lovett and Ahmed can play we will be fine. Has to continue to get better players though. That is why Slice leaving hurts. Part of me wonders that even with all the As the World Turns nonsense with the coaches if one of the reasons Slice was unhappy is he realized he COULD NOT recruit at ST John's.
I'd like Mullin to be engaged. I don't care if he feigns ennui as long as he is invested in the process. I assume he is, because there was no reason for him to take the gig if he weren't.
Matt doesn't seem to have a problem recruiting at SJU. Maybe BR got spoiled being at Kentucky, where every door is always open. Maybe his ego couldn't take the other guy getting all the recruits. Maybe he's just peripatetic, like Larry Brown. It seems to me that it doesn't matter because this is all on Mullin - if he needs some other guy to succeed they should have hired the other guy.