Where does this myth about Bill Self not being a good coach come from?
14 big 12 titles in a row in arguably the deepest conference in the country.
In his last 21 years of coaching with Tulsa, Illinois, and now Kansas, he has finished 1st or tied for 1st in his league 18 times. Other finishes were 2nd, 2nd, and 3rd.
I'm pretty sure everyone in the country would sign up for that success.
7 elite 8s or further during that span.
He is one of the elite's but I believe it's because he is a great recruiter, not a great coach. Is Cal a great coach because of his record of success, or great recruiter? Look at Lavin's success at UCLA, great coach? Did any of you read the quote by Romeo Langford on Cal?
Basically it said, "Romeo was also disappointed, apparently, by Calipari’s in-game coaching ability. When Team USA was trailing Canada in the semi-finals, Langford went into the huddle and felt like Calipari was in over his head."
I'm not taking anything away from the success these coaches have had. I'm just making the distinction of Coach vs. Recruiter. I would like us to get a great recruiter. Self is a great recruiter, and his record is indicative of that, not being a great coach.