6th Man of St. John's Basketball

St. John's Red Storm => In The Jungle... => Topic started by: carmineabbatiello on January 20, 2020, 02:20:42 PM

Title: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 20, 2020, 02:20:42 PM
Dave does not like it when you guys bad mouth our hero and I and others defend him. Essentially hijacking other game threads and such.

I for one will try to keep it here.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 20, 2020, 02:40:37 PM
debate all day and night in here.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: TONYD3 on January 20, 2020, 02:48:15 PM
debate all day and night in here.
Nothing to debate. His record speaks for himself. And it’s worse the norm Roberts.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 20, 2020, 04:40:03 PM
Nothing to debate. His record speaks for himself. And it’s worse the norm Roberts.
His record that counts is far superior to Roberts.

Mullin: 4 seasons - 1 Ncaa tournament
Roberts: 6 seasons - 0 Ncaa tournaments

His record speaks for itself.

The regular season don't mean sh*t except for how it places you in regard to the dance. Everybody knows that.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: SJUFAN on January 20, 2020, 06:23:06 PM
His record that counts is far superior to Roberts.

Mullin: 4 seasons - 1 Ncaa tournament
Roberts: 6 seasons - 0 Ncaa tournaments

His record speaks for itself.

The regular season don't mean sh*t except for how it places you in regard to the dance. Everybody knows that.


How is it “far” superior? I see what your doing and it’s pretty pathetic. The only thing you can say that is positive about the Mullin regime is his singular lose in the play in game. You try your best to make it as if that is the only thing that matters and because of that is what makes him great.

Mullin was handed the keys to a relevant program and crashed it.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: Marillac on January 20, 2020, 07:09:35 PM
The only thing that matters here is NCAA tournament appearances. That’s it. Maybe we can enjoy a little success and raise the bar on that in the future.

1/4 years is bare minimum. 2/4 and we’ve got something decent. 3/4 and you’re the best coach in 30 years.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: TONYD3 on January 20, 2020, 07:15:12 PM
The only thing that matters here is NCAA tournament appearances. That’s it. Maybe we can enjoy a little success and raise the bar on that in the future.

1/4 years is bare minimum. 2/4 and we’ve got something decent. 3/4 and you’re the best coach in 30 years.
That’s the most absurd thing that you have said in a while. And that’s really saying something.
Once conference play started Mullin was 9-13. Boy wonder doctored the most pathetic schedule in school history only to get embarrassed on Wednesday night not in the final 64, but in Dayton. The fact you losers are proud of that is again is hysterical.
Luckily we finally have an AD.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: SJUFAN on January 20, 2020, 09:50:58 PM
I’m not trying to bash Mullin. I thought he could be successful here if  he brought in the right people. No one should be crucified for simply pointing out what he was doing wrong.

When Mullin took over the program it was in really good shape. We were coming off two consecutive 20 win seasons and an NCAA birth. Most importantly is we were developing relationships with local programs. We were recruiting Europe. When Mullin took over, Ponds, Yakwe, LoVett, Ahmed, Mussini were already tied to the program. They hadn’t signed yet, but they were a done deal. We had Sampson and Samir signed. Still had Obekpa and Jordan. Mullin wasn’t interested in baby sitting or re-recruiting them, fine. That’s his choice, but don’t say he wasn’t left anything. The program was relevant.

Fast forward 4 years and where are we? Yes we were coming off a playin lose, the first winning season in four years, but most importantly are we relevant? What HS/AAU programs are we tied to? Who are we recruiting? Four years later and we are worse off with recruiting than when he took over. We were no longer relevant and it was due to a failed philosophy, one that didn’t appear was going to change. Anderson has to start from scratch. Building relationships with coaches, players. He has to rebuild the program.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 20, 2020, 10:42:04 PM
How is it “far” superior?
Because percentage wise 1 is more than 0 by like a billion or zillion or google or infinity or an undefined number or such.  Wow! That really is far superior.  And in less seasons even.
Quote
I see what your doing and it’s pretty pathetic. The only thing you can say that is positive about the Mullin regime is his singular lose in the play in game.
The only positive thing I can say about any Johnny coach this millennium is that their regime had a singular lose in their opening Ncaa tournament game.
Quote

You try your best to make it as if that is the only thing that matters and because of that is what makes him great.
Please point out where I said that Mullin was a great coach. Hint: You've imagined it.
Quote
Mullin was handed the keys to a relevant program and crashed it.
Two coaches prior the QC guy was 0 for 6. The immediately preceding coach was 2 for 5 and left Mullin with the worst returning roster in the history of the program. Mullin was 1 for 4.  Describing St. John's as a "relevant program" in the 2000's is laughable and what exactly was crashed?
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 20, 2020, 10:44:56 PM
only to get embarrassed on Wednesday night not in the final 64, but in Dayton. 
Roberts would have given his right testicle to get embarrassed such and Hollywood would have traded a healthy prostate for such embarrassment 60% of the time.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: Marillac on January 20, 2020, 10:51:14 PM
Dave, you are letting a handful of guys destroy this board. Who wants to see Carmine debate the same group everyday over Mullin? He’s not even the coach anymore.

A few guys should get short suspensions. I’ll take one for the team and join the group. How many times a day does TonyD have to insult Mullin before something happens? This forum has essentially become his personal diary about how he hates him and it leaves the rest of us with only the option to insult his low intelligence. He has become this generation’s Old Red.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 20, 2020, 11:00:33 PM
Dave, you are letting a handful of guys destroy this board. Who wants to see Carmine debate the same group everyday over Mullin? He’s not even the coach anymore.

A few guys should get short suspensions. I’ll take one for the team and join the group. How many times a day does TonyD have to insult Mullin before something happens? This forum has essentially become his personal diary about how he hates him and it leaves the rest of us with only the option to insult his low intelligence. He has become this generation’s Old Red.
It'll be better now. We can do it all in this separate thread I've created and those readers with lives or half a brain can avoid it altogether.

Nobody should be suspended as the 1st amendment was intended to protect all persons. Even disloyal, treasonous, blasphemous imbeciles.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 20, 2020, 11:24:39 PM
Dave, you are letting a handful of guys destroy this board. Who wants to see Carmine debate the same group everyday over Mullin? He’s not even the coach anymore.

A few guys should get short suspensions. I’ll take one for the team and join the group. How many times a day does TonyD have to insult Mullin before something happens? This forum has essentially become his personal diary about how he hates him and it leaves the rest of us with only the option to insult his low intelligence. He has become this generation’s Old Red.

I hear you. I'm cool with containing it to this thread and not beyond. Don't have to read the back and forth here
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 20, 2020, 11:29:15 PM
How is it “far” superior? I see what your doing and it’s pretty pathetic. The only thing you can say that is positive about the Mullin regime is his singular lose in the play in game. You try your best to make it as if that is the only thing that matters and because of that is what makes him great.

Mullin was handed the keys to a relevant program and crashed it.

We had 1 NCAA Tournament appearance (we really should have made it year before too), produced 2/3 NBA players, attendance was up, donors were up

Far from crashing the program.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 21, 2020, 12:42:17 AM
'Our favored son doctored the most pathetic schedule in school history' 
Even you probably know that the conference schedule is set by the league. So I'm assuming you're referring to the out of conference schedule.

So riddle me this: If the out of conference schedule was "the most pathetic in school history" - How did a team with an 8-10 conference record for a 7th place finish qualify for the Ncaa tournament? Over 3 teams that finished ahead of them in the BE even.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 21, 2020, 02:48:35 AM
We had 1 NCAA Tournament appearance (we really should have made it year before too), produced 2/3 NBA players, attendance was up, donors were up

Far from crashing the program.

I’m referring to the product on the floor Dave. Do you believe attendance and donors would have remained high with a subpar product? I guess it’s possible. Is that all that mattered to the Mullin faithful? Attendance and donors?

We were going to get our teeth kicked in most years. Where were the recruits? Waiting to see who will put their name in the transfer portal isn’t a sound strategy. Ponds was the reason for the little success he had and he wasn’t landing another Ponds type player.

I would have been ok extending Mullin if he brought in Rice and got rid of Mitch for another recruiter/coach. But he didn’t want to.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on January 21, 2020, 05:33:23 AM
I don't know how some people of here can bash Lavin and praise Mullin. Lavin was way better and more successful. How can you say oh Mullin Left Anderson Mustapah and LJ two preseason all Big east 2nd team players and then turn around and say Lavin left Mullin with the worst roster in school history when Jordan and Obekpa were actually left here. It has to go both ways here on both sides.

Dave, if you had to choose who would you rather have as the coach of your program Lavin or Mullin? I feel like you are unbiased and honest so I will ask you that.
Title: Re: MULLIN - Anderson thread
Post by: Johnny23 on January 21, 2020, 07:39:12 AM
We had 1 NCAA Tournament appearance (we really should have made it year before too), produced 2/3 NBA players, attendance was up, donors were up

Far from crashing the program.

Close doesn't count. You either make it or you don't. We made 1 NCAA appearance under Mullin (as the LAST team in the field) and it was the definition of backing in to any casual observer last year.

Hardly building a consistent anything.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 21, 2020, 08:04:27 AM
Roberts would have given his right testicle to get embarrassed such and Hollywood would have traded a healthy prostate for such embarrassment 60% of the time.
Agree. Roberts gave a shit and tried his best.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: talkbigeast on January 21, 2020, 09:38:45 AM
Who are the 2/3 NBA players? Ponds was there for what 10 days but ill give you that he will probably bounce from time to time.....Who are the other two?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 21, 2020, 09:49:21 AM
I guess it’s possible. Is that all that mattered to the Mullin faithful? Attendance and donors?
No. Ncaa tournament appearances mattered to St. John fans (Mullin faithful).
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 21, 2020, 10:16:16 AM
Who are the 2/3 NBA players? Ponds was there for what 10 days but ill give you that he will probably bounce from time to time.....Who are the other two?
Dave is giving Chris mullin credit for Tariq Owens. Simon is in the G league.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: talkbigeast on January 21, 2020, 10:22:37 AM
we get ZERO credit for Tariq Owens he transferred
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on January 21, 2020, 10:55:23 AM
we get ZERO credit for Tariq Owens he transferred

And blossomed into a much better player at Texas Tech under great coaching vs zero coaching here.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 21, 2020, 12:05:24 PM
we get ZERO credit for Tariq Owens he transferred

He graduated.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 21, 2020, 01:12:11 PM
He graduated.
And mussini and fredenburg travelled thousands of miles to start college then go pro.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: talkbigeast on January 21, 2020, 01:26:01 PM
He Transferred....Look up players from St. John's playing or to play in NBA he is not associated with us .....dont give me that bs......Lol Foad you would fall that low
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 21, 2020, 01:56:34 PM
He Transferred....Look up players from St. John's playing or to play in NBA he is not associated with us .....dont give me that bs......Lol Foad you would fall that low

He attended St John's for three years, graduated, and then used his remaining year of eligibility as a graduate transfer at Texas Tech. Note the word graduate in the phrase "graduate transfer."
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: derk on January 21, 2020, 02:00:30 PM
Sampson and Harkless.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on January 21, 2020, 02:08:51 PM
The biggest flaw to Mullin coaching was that he was not fully vested at being the SJUBB coach. Not saying he was lazy, I am saying he did not like many of the aspects of being a college coach.

Even if he hired the perfect staff, that would not be enough. The biggest issues were:

-Splitting time between NY and California

-He ran the program like a pro team, instead of treating them like college students. His presence needed to be around more. Even if the staff does everything he wanted, it is still not the same as when the leader of the organization is there. People slack off, it’s the nature of any organization.

-Self awareness, between wearing shorts in Hawaii, sitting on the scores table, trying both his shoes on national television, cursing at refs.

 If he won more this would all be considered Quirky or part of Mullin’s personality. Instead these became critiques of how engaged he is with his program.

-The disjointedness of his position. The President sent him up to fail by having Mullin directly report to him. That undermined the first AD, and there was going to be major conflict down the road between Mullin and Cragg.

The President chose the AD over the coach.

Mullin staying longer would have kept the structure out of sync, because he wasn’t Cragg’s pick and it was obvious Cragg wasn’t impressed by him.

Right now the organization is in sync the AD picked Anderson and the President supported that decision. Time will tell if Anderson was the right pick to finally rebuild SJU in the proper way.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on January 21, 2020, 02:20:42 PM
Sampson and Harkless.

Wrong. Harkless was a Lavin player.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 21, 2020, 04:32:39 PM
I don't know how some people of here can bash Lavin and praise Mullin. Lavin was way better and more successful. How can you say oh Mullin Left Anderson Mustapah and LJ two preseason all Big east 2nd team players and then turn around and say Lavin left Mullin with the worst roster in school history when Jordan and Obekpa were actually left here. It has to go both ways here on both sides.

Dave, if you had to choose who would you rather have as the coach of your program Lavin or Mullin? I feel like you are unbiased and honest so I will ask you that.

Lavin was a slightly better, albeit sketchier, coach.

There really isn’t a ton of difference between our last three coaches in terms of overall effectiveness. When you consider recruiting, philosophy, and in-game coaching it is Anderson-Lavin-Mullin in that order, but we’re talking about the difference in making the tournament and maybe winning a game there. It’s not like we are arguing over a potential Elite Eight. We fired the two guys responsible for that years ago.

The problem, outside of pure delusion, seems to be when coaches raise expectations. Raising expectations here is the first step towards a pink slip.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 21, 2020, 04:57:10 PM
And blossomed into a much better player at Texas Tech under great coaching vs zero coaching here.

Would you say he “blossomed into a much better player” at St. John’s vs what he was at Tennessee? He shot 35.3% and averaged far less pts and rebounds per minute with more turnovers per minute there. Of course you wouldn’t say that because it doesn’t fit your narrative, you ridiculous troll.

Owens last season here:

8.4 pts, 5.9 rebs, 2.8 blks, .4 asts

Owens at Texas Tech as a senior with Final Four talent around him:

8.7 pts, 5.8 rbs, 2.4 blks, .7 asts

https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tariq-owens-1.html

It would be hard to find someone who played so consistently after switching schools...let alone going from a team that didn’t even make the NIT to a team that made the NCAA tournament championship game.


Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 21, 2020, 05:32:50 PM
Lavin was a slightly better, albeit sketchier, coach.

There really isn’t a ton of difference between our last three coaches in terms of overall effectiveness. When you consider recruiting, philosophy, and in-game coaching it is Anderson-Lavin-Mullin in that order, but we’re talking about the difference in making the tournament and maybe winning a game there. It’s not like we are arguing over a potential Elite Eight. We fired the two guys responsible for that years ago.

The problem, outside of pure delusion, seems to be when coaches raise expectations. Raising expectations here is the first step towards a pink slip.
I was done with this topic. Nudinator 59 described the situation nicely. We should have left it there. This is why this topic will never die.
Like Lavin or not. He took a bunch of guys who won NOTHING into the top 20. That team beat a bunch of great teams including giving the national champions a beat down.
He was left nothing also. And he isn’t a great coach, but he hired a real staff, and recruited a great class. Those guys lost plenty that first year. But they didn’t embarrass us. Dunlap established a culture. That team learned to play defense.
Lavin left not doing as well as we would have liked. But 20 games or so over .500 is not slightly better then 20-59 (with 40 knockouts- knockouts are worse then losses). One more time,  giving up near a 100 points while barley scoring 60 is very bad. That should never happen.
Lavin deserves respect just because he did a good job. Maybe he deserved to be fired. But what happened was the biggest mistake in program history. Probably big east history. I have never seen a school give itself the death penalty before.
Hopefully our new coach is better. He doesn’t need a pass. But He should get some understanding.
If we got someone to mediate our little fight. I think it would be obvious which side was delusional.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 21, 2020, 05:37:45 PM
Would you say he “blossomed into a much better player” at St. John’s vs what he was at Tennessee? He shot 35.3% and averaged far less pts and rebounds per minute with more turnovers per minute there. Of course you wouldn’t say that because it doesn’t fit your narrative, you ridiculous troll.

Owens last season here:

8.4 pts, 5.9 rebs, 2.8 blks, .4 asts

Owens at Texas Tech as a senior with Final Four talent around him:

8.7 pts, 5.8 rbs, 2.4 blks, .7 asts

https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tariq-owens-1.html

It would be hard to find someone who played so consistently after switching schools...let alone going from a team that didn’t even make the NIT to a team that made the NCAA tournament championship game.



He went from 8 points at St. John’s and now he signed an NBA contract. Anyone who watched him in the tournament knows he got better. Much better. He was faster and stronger also. Those are not opinions, again he just signed a contract.
If anyone suggested ownes would play in the NBA we would have laughed at him.
Fit your narrative? 20-59 isn’t ok. 20-59 is disgraceful
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on January 21, 2020, 05:49:23 PM
Would you say he “blossomed into a much better player” at St. John’s vs what he was at Tennessee? He shot 35.3% and averaged far less pts and rebounds per minute with more turnovers per minute there. Of course you wouldn’t say that because it doesn’t fit your narrative, you ridiculous troll.

Owens last season here:

8.4 pts, 5.9 rebs, 2.8 blks, .4 asts

Owens at Texas Tech as a senior with Final Four talent around him:

8.7 pts, 5.8 rbs, 2.4 blks, .7 asts

https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/tariq-owens-1.html

It would be hard to find someone who played so consistently after switching schools...let alone going from a team that didn’t even make the NIT to a team that made the NCAA tournament championship game.




Of course what you fail to mention there is that Owens essentially matched his output in those categories while playing 13% fewer minutes over the course of the season. That's not an insignificant number. Owens was drastically better at Texas Tech and it wasn't even close.

His offensive rating went from 103.6 to 125.8. Effective FG% from 53.9% to 63%. Those are HUGE differences.

He went from rebounding 5.6% of shots on offense to 10.9%. Nearly double.

His Assist rate was higher, block % was higher and turnover % was lower.

He got to the FT way more and went from a 69% FT shooter to a 78% shooter.

He went from making 54.9% of his two point attempts to 67.6%.

If you think Owens took anything less than a massive leap forward at TTU then you are delusional.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 21, 2020, 06:00:29 PM
Of course what you fail to mention there is that Owens essentially matched his output in those categories while playing 13% fewer minutes over the course of the season. That's not an insignificant number. Owens was drastically better at Texas Tech and it wasn't even close.

His offensive rating went from 103.6 to 125.8. Effective FG% from 53.9% to 63%. Those are HUGE differences.

He went from rebounding 5.6% of shots on offense to 10.9%. Nearly double.

His Assist rate was higher, block % was higher and turnover % was lower.

He got to the FT way more and went from a 69% FT shooter to a 78% shooter.

He went from making 54.9% of his two point attempts to 67.6%.

If you think Owens took anything less than a massive leap forward at TTU then you are delusional.

I really don’t understand this constant campaign to make Mullins coaching out to be anything more than what his coaching record said it was.

So Mullin developed Owens, ok. That would mean he went 4-14 with two NBA players along with 5 star recruit and eventual DPOY Simon in his starting line up but it’s LoVett’s fault.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 21, 2020, 06:16:11 PM
Of course what you fail to mention there is that Owens essentially matched his output in those categories while playing 13% fewer minutes over the course of the season. That's not an insignificant number. Owens was drastically better at Texas Tech and it wasn't even close.

His offensive rating went from 103.6 to 125.8. Effective FG% from 53.9% to 63%. Those are HUGE differences.

He went from rebounding 5.6% of shots on offense to 10.9%. Nearly double.

His Assist rate was higher, block % was higher and turnover % was lower.

He got to the FT way more and went from a 69% FT shooter to a 78% shooter.

He went from making 54.9% of his two point attempts to 67.6%.

If you think Owens took anything less than a massive leap forward at TTU then you are delusional.




Now do the breakdown from Tennessee to St. John’s. It is even bigger. Stop playing things one way.

At Tech, he was 20% more experienced and 10% heavier. He was surrounded by Final Four talent, including the #6 overall pick in the draft who is averaging 10,4, and 2 as a rookie. Ponds is in the G-League.




Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 21, 2020, 06:20:35 PM
I really don’t understand this constant campaign to make Mullins coaching out to be anything more than what his coaching record said it was.

So Mullin developed Owens, ok. That would mean he went 4-14 with two NBA players along with 5 star recruit and eventual DPOY Simon in his starting line up but it’s LoVett’s fault.

Show me one person besides Carmine that has ever said Mullin was even good you f*cking idiot.

WTF do you and your three buddies have to prove? Mullin was a disastrous hire. His fate was sealed when Ratt A chased Slide away. You don’t learn on the job in the Big East. Can’t you just leave it at that? 

Jesus Christ. We saw awful for six years. It was Norm Roberts. All hope was gone. Just move on you insufferable prick.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 21, 2020, 06:59:23 PM
Show me one person besides Carmine that has ever said Mullin was even good you f*cking idiot.

WTF do you and your three buddies have to prove? Mullin was a disastrous hire. His fate was sealed when Ratt A chased Slide away. You don’t learn on the job in the Big East. Can’t you just leave it at that? 

Jesus Christ. We saw awful for six years. It was Norm Roberts. All hope was gone. Just move on you insufferable prick.
Can you please call me names also. It makes me feel left out
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on January 21, 2020, 07:22:48 PM
Now do the breakdown from Tennessee to St. John’s. It is even bigger. Stop playing things one way.

You constantly say how hard it is for Freshmen big men to be good and now you're trying to compare Owens' jump from his 4th year in college to his 5th year in college to the jump he made from his 1st year to his 3rd year. You know that's comparing apples to razor blades but anything for you to make a point and not look like an idiot I guess.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 21, 2020, 10:05:27 PM
You constantly say how hard it is for Freshmen big men to be good and now you're trying to compare Owens' jump from his 4th year in college to his 5th year in college to the jump he made from his 1st year to his 3rd year. You know that's comparing apples to razor blades but anything for you to make a point and not look like an idiot I guess.

I am not the one who is seeking to credit or discredit a coach. If the poster is going to attempt to credit the third coach of a two-time transfer for improvements without acknowledging the improvements the player made after his first transfer, then that shows obvious bias. How is that debatable?

Nobody on this forum has even suggested Mullin was good...of course he can’t hold Chris Beard’s jockstrap!

Owens’ raw stats were nearly identical. Who would you expect Owens to play better next to...a PF that plays on the perimeter like Clark or a 5th-year 250 lb senior who plays down low and averaged almost 20 mpg on his 5-year career at Tech? Whst about the #6 overall draft pick on Culver over an undrsfted G-Leaguer like Ponds? You can go position by position and Tech destroys our 2017-2018 by a wide margin everywhere. Of course he’s going to be more efficient!!!!




Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 21, 2020, 10:35:54 PM
Owens’ raw stats were nearly identical. Who would you expect Owens to play better next to...a PF that plays on the perimeter like Clark or a 5th-year 250 lb senior who plays down low and averaged almost 20 mpg on his 5-year career at Tech? Whst about the #6 overall draft pick on Culver over an undrsfted G-Leaguer like Ponds? You can go position by position and Tech destroys our 2017-2018 by a wide margin everywhere. Of course he’s going to be more efficient!!!!

Interesting concept. So Anderson doesn’t know how to use Heron and LJ but for Owens supporting cast does play a factor. Go figure.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 21, 2020, 10:43:05 PM
Interesting concept. So Anderson doesn’t know how to use Heron and LJ but for Owens supporting cast does play a factor. Go figure.

Who ever said supporting cast doesn’t play a factor? Keep creating strawman arguments to respond to.

Unlike you and your fellow dummies I don’t have to reduce everything down to binary.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 21, 2020, 10:59:21 PM
Who ever said supporting cast doesn’t play a factor? Keep creating strawman arguments to respond to.

Unlike you and your fellow dummies I don’t have to reduce everything down to binary.


You realize he left because of the coach right? Not the supporting cast. No other reason. Tariq liked St. John’s
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on January 21, 2020, 11:02:58 PM
I am not the one who is seeking to credit or discredit a coach. If the poster is going to attempt to credit the third coach of a two-time transfer for improvements without acknowledging the improvements the player made after his first transfer, then that shows obvious bias. How is that debatable?

Nobody on this forum has even suggested Mullin was good...of course he can’t hold Chris Beard’s jockstrap!

Owens’ raw stats were nearly identical. Who would you expect Owens to play better next to...a PF that plays on the perimeter like Clark or a 5th-year 250 lb senior who plays down low and averaged almost 20 mpg on his 5-year career at Tech? Whst about the #6 overall draft pick on Culver over an undrsfted G-Leaguer like Ponds? You can go position by position and Tech destroys our 2017-2018 by a wide margin everywhere. Of course he’s going to be more efficient!!!!






Thank you for admitting you were wrong
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 21, 2020, 11:13:47 PM
Thank you for admitting you were wrong

What claim did I make and how was it wrong? Reading comprehension errors and a bad memory have become your caing cards.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 21, 2020, 11:19:50 PM
I don't know how some people of here can bash Lavin and praise Mullin. Lavin was way better and more successful. How can you say oh Mullin Left Anderson Mustapah and LJ two preseason all Big east 2nd team players and then turn around and say Lavin left Mullin with the worst roster in school history when Jordan and Obekpa were actually left here. It has to go both ways here on both sides.

Dave, if you had to choose who would you rather have as the coach of your program Lavin or Mullin? I feel like you are unbiased and honest so I will ask you that.

Lavin without hesitation
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on January 22, 2020, 12:09:39 AM
What claim did I make and how was it wrong? Reading comprehension errors and a bad memory have become your caing cards.

Apology accepted
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 22, 2020, 12:16:39 AM
Ponds - Raptors
Owens- Suns
Simon - Bulls (he's definitely gonna get called up. Playing really well.)

As for a lot of a lot of Owens discussion. I thought his skill development took a large leap at St. John's. If you want credit that purely to maturation I don't think that's fair.

The point still remains Mullin era had some positives. I still firmly believe if the school doubled down on Mullin with an extension and enabled him to expand staff they would have been just fine this year and beyond.

I think there is a good chance they would have been able to convince Simon to have stayed. We would have been top half of conference and dancing.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on January 22, 2020, 12:23:02 AM
I don't know how some people of here can bash Lavin and praise Mullin. Lavin was way better and more successful. How can you say oh Mullin Left Anderson Mustapah and LJ two preseason all Big east 2nd team players and then turn around and say Lavin left Mullin with the worst roster in school history when Jordan and Obekpa were actually left here. It has to go both ways here on both sides.

Dave, if you had to choose who would you rather have as the coach of your program Lavin or Mullin? I feel like you are unbiased and honest so I will ask you that.

Jordan was not going to be on the roster even if Lavin was here. He was not going to classes and his academics were in shambles. Obekpa was gone too. He never suited up in college again.

Mullin had the worst administration in sju sports history. Atleast Lavin had Orange Man. Mullin had an interim and then they hired Goff, who had no idea what he was doing. They couldn't even retain lower level support staff. They couldn't provide proper transportation or food for their student athletes. It was a joke.

Lav had hit his ceiling with this program. He brought in some great talent, but that well was drying out and his heart wasn't in it anymore. He had marital problems, Cancer, Pops dying.

If Cragg was here for the start of the Mullin era this program would be taking off.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on January 22, 2020, 12:32:10 AM
Ponds - Raptors
Owens- Suns
Simon - Bulls (he's definitely gonna get called up. Playing really well.)

As for a lot of a lot of Owens discussion. I thought his skill development took a large leap at St. John's. If you want credit that purely to maturation I don't think that's fair.

The point still remains Mullin era had some positives. I still firmly believe if the school doubled down on Mullin with an extension and enabled him to expand staff they would have been just fine this year and beyond.

I think there is a good chance they would have been able to convince Simon to have stayed. We would have been top half of conference and dancing.

What do you think his staff would look like this year had he stayed? Just curious
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 22, 2020, 12:36:22 AM
What do you think his staff would look like this year had he stayed? Just curious

That depends on if he got an extension or not. You're not going to get anyone worth a damn if people believe you're a lame duck.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 22, 2020, 01:33:10 AM
Who ever said supporting cast doesn’t play a factor?

I must have missed you stating that as part of the reason Heron and LJ aren’t performing up to their pre-season billing.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on January 22, 2020, 01:40:55 AM
Jordan was not going to be on the roster even if Lavin was here. He was not going to classes and his academics were in shambles. Obekpa was gone too. He never suited up in college again.

Mullin had the worst administration in sju sports history. Atleast Lavin had Orange Man. Mullin had an interim and then they hired Goff, who had no idea what he was doing. They couldn't even retain lower level support staff. They couldn't provide proper transportation or food for their student athletes. It was a joke.

Lav had hit his ceiling with this program. He brought in some great talent, but that well was drying out and his heart wasn't in it anymore. He had marital problems, Cancer, Pops dying.

If Cragg was here for the start of the Mullin era this program would be taking off.

Lots of great points in your post including recalling that they couldn't even get food for their student athletes but I will add that their coach may have been able to help in that department if he wasn't 3,000 miles away.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 22, 2020, 02:21:42 AM
I must have missed you stating that as part of the reason Heron and LJ aren’t performing up to their pre-season billing.

How stupid are you exactly? Do you think that players can’t be good at all because there are less talented players around them? Everyone on this forum, including yourself, has identified players they think have been playing well this year. Do levels not exist to you?

Heron has been awful. We aren’t seeing a guy who is just less efficient. Would he be better with more talent around him? Probably. Is that the main reason for his struggles? I think the answer is an obvious no, but you can’t beat an idiot in an argument. It’s impossible.

Coach Anderson himself would tell you that he targets a specific type of player for his system. Heron is not that guy by a long shot. Heron probably wouldn’t be that guy for Boeheim either, but you bet your arse a guy like Tony Bennett would want him.

Do you honestly think certain players don’t fit certain systems or philosophies better than others?

What are the odds that our best two returning half court players—players who were regarded by league coaches as among the best 12 in the conference—would both get worse with a new coach?

I’ve gone out of my to give Anderson the benefit of the doubt that he is laying the groundwork for the future instead of catering too two star players who won’t be here beyond this season.

But you’d rather trash two college kids and Mullin.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 22, 2020, 02:28:12 AM
He was left nothing also.
It is impossible that anybody believes Lavin was left with nothing.
Quote
Hopefully our new coach is better. 
Reality check. Mark the date. The Honeymoon is over.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 22, 2020, 02:30:45 AM
Fit your narrative? 20-59 isn’t ok. 20-59 is disgraceful
It's a lot better percentage wise than the coach who's a$$ you've been kissing since April.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on January 22, 2020, 03:49:29 AM
Lavin without hesitation

I totally agree and its not even close. Its sad looking back at it now, I think Lavin could have had a career here like Cooley has had at Providence, in or on the cusp of the tournament every year with some continuity.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on January 22, 2020, 03:57:12 AM
I thought Mullin axed the idea of bringing mike rice in. I just don't get why he didn't make Mitch a special advisor and hire a real coach and recruiter.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on January 22, 2020, 04:05:37 AM
I totally agree with Marillac, the only person on here the thinks Mullin was a good coach is Carmine. I feel that everyone else states the obvious, legendary player, awful coach.

I feel like most of us should try to be more realistic with things. Mullin was a bad coach, and the team this year has been horrible so far. You have to give Anderson time and players for his system but the half court offense has been almost as bad as the Mullins first year team.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on January 22, 2020, 05:35:09 AM
I totally agree with Marillac, the only person on here the thinks Mullin was a good coach is Carmine. I feel that everyone else states the obvious, legendary player, awful coach.

I feel like most of us should try to be more realistic with things. Mullin was a bad coach, and the team this year has been horrible so far. You have to give Anderson time and players for his system but the half court offense has been almost as bad as the Mullins first year team.


We missed enough shots the last three games where the half court offense stuff can stop. Wasn’t the reason we lost. 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 22, 2020, 06:40:14 AM
I thought Mullin axed the idea of bringing mike rice in.

Once again

"Mullin wanted to hire former Rutgers head coach Mike Rice as an assistant last summer … But when Mullin brought Rice’s name to Gempesaw, the school president balked, a source said. Gempesaw perhaps feared blowback and a potential public-relations hit."



https://www.forbes.com/sites/jppelzman/2019/04/09/a-hire-chris-mullin-was-not-allowed-to-make-helped-set-the-stage-for-his-departure/#50cbdd875b56
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 22, 2020, 08:00:08 AM
My position regarding our hero was succinctly stated in the Providence thread:

"No, we can agree that Mullin came here a novice coach inheriting the worst roster ever in the history of St. John's and improved his record all four years he was here. The final one was outstanding culminating in an Ncaa tournament bid. His tenure here was not a runaway success.

CFC meanwhile is 1 and 5."
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 22, 2020, 08:23:56 AM
My position regarding our hero was succinctly stated in the Providence thread:

For languages where "succinct" means repeats the same single thought over and over and over again several times a day with slight variations in language and syntax. Unlike English, where succinct means the opposite.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 22, 2020, 08:28:04 AM
For languages where "succinct" means repeats the same single thought over and over and over again several times a day with slight variations in language and syntax. Unlike English, where succinct means the opposite.
I meant this one time. Not overall obviously.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 22, 2020, 08:53:18 AM
My position regarding our hero was succinctly stated in the Providence thread:

"No, we can agree that Mullin came here a novice coach inheriting the worst roster ever in the history of St. John's and improved his record all four years he was here. The final one was outstanding culminating in an Ncaa tournament bid. His tenure here was not a runaway success.

CFC meanwhile is 1 and 5."
Not a runaway success? How so? No one says "Fxck you" like Coach Mullin
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Jon Snow on January 22, 2020, 09:01:37 AM
Go to hogville.net and look up the complaints about Anderson. They never changed regardless of the season.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on January 22, 2020, 09:37:17 AM
Go to hogville.net and look up the complaints about Anderson. They never changed regardless of the season.

Hmm sounds like a fan message board
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: talkbigeast on January 22, 2020, 09:40:45 AM
man we need to win a game or two this board is losing it
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 22, 2020, 10:01:08 AM
We missed enough shots the last three games where the half court offense stuff can stop. Wasn’t the reason we lost. 

Exactly, but it won’t cause it doesn’t fit the trolls narrative.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 22, 2020, 10:28:58 AM
Exactly, but it won’t cause it doesn’t fit the trolls narrative.

Because one sure fire indication of a good offense is lots of missed shots.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on January 22, 2020, 10:33:55 AM
One of the biggest criticisms of Mullin was his staff.

What does everyone think about Anderson’s staff? Obviously it’s Anderson’s team, but is his staff strong to influence Anderson down the road to change the strategy of needed?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 22, 2020, 11:20:43 AM
One of the biggest criticisms of Mullin was his staff.

What does everyone think about Anderson’s staff? Obviously it’s Anderson’s team, but is his staff strong to influence Anderson down the road to change the strategy of needed?
I haven't noticed Anderson look to his staff at all. The younger guy occasionally barks out instructions.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on January 22, 2020, 11:57:52 AM
One of the biggest criticisms of Mullin was his staff.

What does everyone think about Anderson’s staff? Obviously it’s Anderson’s team, but is his staff strong to influence Anderson down the road to change the strategy of needed?

Well regarded. DeMeo's name has been brought up in multiple games this year as being a key addition for Anderson.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 22, 2020, 05:01:41 PM
One of the biggest criticisms of Mullin was his staff.

What does everyone think about Anderson’s staff? Obviously it’s Anderson’s team, but is his staff strong to influence Anderson down the road to change the strategy of needed?

His nephew looks clueless to me. DeMeo puzzles me. 10 years as a coach at Providence and then a JUCO? I’m not sure people understand how big of a drop that is. I was offered a head coaching job at a JUCO at like age 25-26 when my then head coach was thinking about retiring to remain as just AD and wanted me to take over.

DeMeo did a great job at JUCO and probably made some good connections but that is a job for a very young man with ambition or a defeated older man willing to settle.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on January 22, 2020, 06:27:39 PM
Macon is solid but they don't have a real recruiting ace on the staff. Need a young local guy with something to prove.




Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: BannerMountainMan on January 22, 2020, 06:29:29 PM
Why are you on this board if you are a D1 head coach Marillac?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 22, 2020, 06:42:56 PM
Why are you on this board if you are a D1 head coach Marillac?

I am a lawyer. I went to law school instead of taking that job. There are aspects of being involved with a college athletic program that are disgusting and completely exhausting.

I have many stories as a former student athlete and coach that I can’t share here. In basketball and football it’s something new every single day. Drugs, fights, not going to class, girls, etc. I wanted no part of that.

I came up through the circuit of camps and clinics (and many hours drinking at the bar and hotel rooms after) with a ton of awesome guys who are now head coaches at prep schools, JUCOs and assistants at D-1 and D-2 colleges. JUCO was always seen as just a rung on the ladder — and you often have to switch ladders every year or two keep climbing. An assistant position at a Big East school is on a different planet than any head coaching JUCO position.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 22, 2020, 06:43:04 PM
170-27 sounds like a defeated man? That’s demo’s record as a head coach.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on January 22, 2020, 06:59:33 PM
I thought Mullin axed the idea of bringing mike rice in. I just don't get why he didn't make Mitch a special advisor and hire a real coach and recruiter.
That was stupid. Mullin had zero coaching exp, so who does he hire as his associate head coach , someone also w zero coaching exp. He should have had an experienced coach that was a recruiter also as his first assistant.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on January 22, 2020, 07:04:30 PM
I am a lawyer. I went to law school instead of taking that job. There are aspects of being involved with a college athletic program that are disgusting and completely exhausting.

I have many stories as a former student athlete and coach that I can’t share here. In basketball and football it’s something new every single day. Drugs, fights, not going to class, girls, etc. I wanted no part of that.

I came up through the circuit of camps and clinics (and many hours drinking at the bar and hotel rooms after) with a ton of awesome guys who are now head coaches at prep schools, JUCOs and assistants at D-1 and D-2 colleges. JUCO was always seen as just a rung on the ladder — and you often have to switch ladders every year or two keep climbing. An assistant position at a Big East school is on a different planet than any head coaching JUCO position.
Give you a lot of credit for attending camps and clinics. Just wondering if you ran into Chrissy at any of them?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 22, 2020, 07:07:45 PM
That was stupid. Mullin had zero coaching exp, so who does he hire as his associate head coach , someone also w zero coaching exp. He should have had an experienced coach that was a recruiter also as his first assistant.

Hiring Mitch as an assistant was insanity. We already got 99.9% of the benefit of having him from his role as a special advisor.  We had a very good replacement lined up for Matt but Mullin was let go.

The entire coaching staff was built around Slice’s experience. Losing him and not immediately replacing him with an experienced assistant is the most St. John’s thing ever.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 22, 2020, 07:09:51 PM
Give you a lot of credit for attending camps and clinics. Just wondering if you ran into Chrissy at any of them?

No, but I’ve chatted up Slice several times.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on January 22, 2020, 07:14:16 PM
Marillac thanks for sharing.
I asked about Anderson’s staff is because since everything is new this is a baseline year. That means limited adjustments will probably be made as CMA staff learns his systems and how he runs things.

It will be interesting if anything can be adjusted or changed in the future. Not expecting major changes because Anderson has his system, but what kind of influence will he Anderson allow his staff to have.

...Some of these games have to go our way...eventually...right?...
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 22, 2020, 07:40:02 PM
Marillac thanks for sharing.
I asked about Anderson’s staff is because since everything is new this is a baseline year. That means limited adjustments will probably be made as CMA staff learns his systems and how he runs things.

It will be interesting if anything can be adjusted or changed in the future. Not expecting major changes because Anderson has his system, but what kind of influence will he Anderson allow his staff to have.

...Some of these games have to go our way...eventually...right?...
What do you think is wrong with the staff? I haven’t agreed with everything he has done. But the guys have responded. Well aware we are losing.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on January 22, 2020, 08:06:58 PM
What do you think is wrong with the staff? I haven’t agreed with everything he has done. But the guys have responded. Well aware we are losing.

Tony not saying there is anything wrong with the staff. Just trying to compare.

A big critique of Mullin’s tenure was his staff.

What hurt Lavin was when Dunlap left.

Is Anderson and his staff a good pairing, does it make sense. Would there anybody want any upgrades.

Everyone can agree that Norm had to go, but the disagreement (which can be good debate) is with the two previous coaches and our current one.

Anderson is clearly the coach first coach. Where Lavin was recruiting, and Mullin was an all time great that was also learning on the job.

Can it be said that part of the downfall was a weak staff for Lavin and Mullin? Can Anderson stabilize this program with Regis staff?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 22, 2020, 09:23:13 PM
No coach is above criticism. However I do believe it’s a bit premature to critique Anderson and staff midway into his first year based on his win/loss total. We were picked to finish 2nd to last. We have the worse roster in the BE. Anderson doesn’t just need his players, he needs players!

We should see steady improvement each year as the offensive talent on the team improves.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 23, 2020, 12:14:00 AM
But the guys have responded. 
The guys have responded? What would the record be if they hadn't responded. 0-7?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 23, 2020, 12:17:10 AM
We should see steady improvement each year as the offensive talent on the team improves.
You've got to be kidding me with this line. That won't be good enough for you. That's what Mullin did and you hate him.

 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Jon Snow on January 23, 2020, 06:19:57 AM
If you have the time:

https://forums.hogville.net/index.php?topic=675208.700

https://forums.hogville.net/index.php?topic=677187.550

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 23, 2020, 09:43:42 AM
Tony not saying there is anything wrong with the staff. Just trying to compare.

A big critique of Mullin’s tenure was his staff.

What hurt Lavin was when Dunlap left.

Is Anderson and his staff a good pairing, does it make sense. Would there anybody want any upgrades.

Everyone can agree that Norm had to go, but the disagreement (which can be good debate) is with the two previous coaches and our current one.

Anderson is clearly the coach first coach. Where Lavin was recruiting, and Mullin was an all time great that was also learning on the job.

Can it be said that part of the downfall was a weak staff for Lavin and Mullin? Can Anderson stabilize this program with Regis staff?

I think Anderson put together a very complementary and experienced staff. I still believe that recruiting will be biggest question mark.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on January 23, 2020, 11:05:58 AM
I think Anderson put together a very complementary and experienced staff. I still believe that recruiting will be biggest question mark.

I thought you called it worse than mullin and norms staff?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: derk on January 23, 2020, 04:16:41 PM
No, but I’ve chatted up Slice several times.

So is he back coaching or thinking about it for anytime in the future
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 23, 2020, 04:24:35 PM
You've got to be kidding me with this line. That won't be good enough for you. That's what Mullin did and you hate him.

I don’t hate Mullin. Last year was the best he was going to get us. We can be better than losing in the play in game every 4 years. That was our ceiling. His recruiting philosophy and not emphasizing defense and rebounding was not gonna cut it.

He had one of the greatest scorers in SJU history playing along with 4 & 5 star recruits and couldn’t generate a .500 record in BE play? He’s not getting another Ponds, mainly because they weren’t recruiting HS kids. This year was gonna be rough regardless of who the coach was.

Do you believe Mullin was going to bring us to the NCAA tournament this year if he was retained?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 23, 2020, 04:34:08 PM
His recruiting philosophy […] was not gonna cut it. […] He had one of the greatest scorers in SJU history playing along with 4 & 5 star recruits

Yeah, recruiting "one of the greatest scorers in SJ history" and various other "4 & 5 star recruits," that sounds like not cutting it. Good point.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 23, 2020, 05:19:01 PM
Yeah, recruiting "one of the greatest scorers in SJ history" and various other "4 & 5 star recruits," that sounds like not cutting it. Good point.
None of you mullin fans will answer this. But would any of you who had a son who was a high 4 star recruit send your son to play for Chris mullin? Assuming he had other high offers would anyone even consider St. John’s ?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: braintrust on January 23, 2020, 06:10:17 PM
None of you mullin fans will answer this. But would any of you who had a son who was a high 4 star recruit send your son to play for Chris mullin? Assuming he had other high offers would anyone even consider St. John’s ?
Mullin did convince Pervous Ellison to send his son to St Johns; Ponds', Yakwe's, LoVett's, Heron's parents all bought in, Clark, Simon...we did get our fair share of highly rated HS talent. Trouble was, on the court, he didn't do anything but set up 3 point shots on offense and relied on shot blocking for defense.

I would send my son to play for St Johns because [1] I've been a fan going back to the 1970s [2] I know the connections he would benefit from off the court; [3] St Johns guys do make money playing professionally because we do attract talent.

That's almost like saying its St Johns primary, whoever is coaching is secondary.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 23, 2020, 07:05:06 PM
Mullin did convince Pervous Ellison to send his son to St Johns; Ponds', Yakwe's, LoVett's, Heron's parents all bought in, Clark, Simon...we did get our fair share of highly rated HS talent.

People don’t want to hear this but Ponds, LoVett, Yakwe, and Mussini came to SJU curtesy of the Lavin regime. Then look who we began to land out of HS, Trimble, Earlington, Roberts, and Williams. We had no one but Mack committed for the 2019 class. We had one recruiter who didn’t spend much time in HS’s.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 23, 2020, 07:16:53 PM
Yeah, recruiting "one of the greatest scorers in SJ history" and various other "4 & 5 star recruits," that sounds like not cutting it. Good point.


Now tell me who he had signed for 2019? Or 2020? Who were we even remotely involved with? You can’t develop and sustain a winning tradition off of transfers alone imo.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 23, 2020, 08:12:50 PM
People don’t want to hear this but Ponds, LoVett, Yakwe, and Mussini came to SJU curtesy of the Lavin regime.

Sure. So when Lavin was at St John's he recruited Joey Delarosa and Amar Alibagowirz and then two years after he left he landed Ponds and Lovett. Thanks for the mind numbingly stupid take.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 23, 2020, 08:22:35 PM
mullin fans

THE SON ALSO SITS

Act two

A middle aged balding man dressed in wrinkled khakis and a white polo shirt tucked in so it hugs his love handles rises from his seat in a half full Long Island Railroad car and makes his way to the toilet. Around his neck is a whistle on a string. The man enters the toilet, retrieves his phone, lowers his pants, sits, and dials.

<Ring ring>

Hello?

Hi Ma.

Tony? Is this Tony? Hi honey.

Hi Ma.

What's up honey?

Nothing ma, on the train, thought I'd call and say hi. Hey ma, remember my friend foady from the internet?

Which friend's that hon?

You know ma, the guy his name is foad but I put a Y at the end of it, see? And it gets to him.

Why do you put a Cee at the end honey, I don't get it.

No ma, I put a Y at the end because it gets to him and I said see it gets to him, like see with your eyes.

Oh I get it. But I don't think I remember your friend.

Sure you do ma. Remember that time I called and told you about that guy on the internet's erection and how hilarious it was?

Oh that friend, the one with the penis. Sure, I remember now. What about him?

Well ma I'm getting to him. Every time he posts on the internet I say something clever right after like butt hurt or I tell him he's old or dare him to answer And it gets to him. So I'm winning.

That's good hon, but you shouldn't get too excited about people being butt hurt, remember what happened to that other gym teacher, that Mister Sandusky.

Physical education teacher ma, or coach, not gym teacher. How many times do I have to tell you.

Sorry hon, that other physical education teacher Mister Sandusky. So anyway how was gym class today - I mean physical education class, sorry hon.

Good ma. We're playing dodge ball this quarter and the boys get real sweaty. Today after class I watched real close when they were showering to make sure they used enough soap on their taints and sure enough Frankie Spumoni wasn't using enough soap on his taint and I said hey Frankie if you don't use enough soap on your taint I'll come over there and soap you myself. It was hilarious. Hey mom, remember when you showed me how to use enough soap on my taint that time you watched me shower?

Of course hon, it was only a few weeks ago. Speaking of a few weeks ago, how's your New Year's diet going?

Okay ma. I had a couple of donuts today fourth period in the teachers lounge, Maria Mustacciuoli the art teacher brought them and so I had a couple of jellies to be polite.

Maria Mustacciuoli, is that your girlfriend?

She's not my girlfriend ma, we're just friends.

Well you should get yourself a nice girlfriend Tony, maybe get married, gimme me a grandbaby, I'm not getting any younger. Maybe you should invite this Mustacciuoli to dinner Sunday, I'll make a nice pasticciotto.

I don't think so ma and anyway I can't make it for dinner Sunday.

Why not hon, your father and I was looking forward to seeing you.

Sorry ma, I have an important jay vee interview Monday, I have to get ready.

Jay vee! Oh Tony! I'm so proud! Wait till I tell Missus Bombolone from next door that you're gonna to be a jay vee basketball coach. She's always rubbing the fact that her son's a garbageman in my face. Except she says sanitation worker. Now I can tell her you're gonna be a middle school basketball coach, which is almost as prestigious.

Yeah, it's not basketball ma, it's wrestling. Girl's wrestling. And it's assistant coach. But I think if I do good there I'll have a real shot at moving up to being player development coach for the Lakers. They hire anyone.

Oh that's okay hon, girls wrastling is a good place to start. Your father used to like girls wrastling. When I first went to his apartment he had a poster of the Fabulous Moolah in the living room. That didn't last long though.

Hey ma how's pops doing anyway?

Well, speaking of butt hurt his piles have been acting up lately. You should say hello, I'll get him. Hey Petey -

No I can't now ma, my stop's next. Tell pops I'll call him tommorow morning after my bran muffin, okay?

Sure hon.

Okay ma, gotta go, love you.

Love you too hon, bye.

The man hangs up, wipes, sniffs his fingers, and satisfied with the smell pulls up his khakis. Taking a quick look in the mirror he carefully adjusts his whistle, flushes, and leaves the toilet

/ And scene
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 23, 2020, 08:45:13 PM
I have plenty of hair and I don’t wear khakis.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 23, 2020, 08:47:05 PM
Sure. So when Lavin was at St John's he recruited Joey Delarosa and Amar Alibagowirz and then two years after he left he landed Ponds and Lovett. Thanks for the mind numbingly stupid take.

Really? How dumb is my take Dave?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: wpc77 on January 23, 2020, 09:17:02 PM
Sure. So when Lavin was at St John's he recruited Joey Delarosa and Amar Alibagowirz and then two years after he left he landed Ponds and Lovett. Thanks for the mind numbingly stupid take.

I get the point, but that said Lovett was being recruited by Lavin when he was fired in late March, and then committed 2 months later. Similar story for Ponds, who committed 6 months after the firing.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on January 23, 2020, 09:44:24 PM
We were barely mentioned with Ponds under lavin. To not give mullin credit for signing him is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: wpc77 on January 23, 2020, 09:54:58 PM
We were barely mentioned with Ponds under lavin. To not give mullin credit for signing him is ridiculous.

Mullin was by far the primary reason we got Ponds.  That said, it is not accurate to say that we were barely mentioned with Ponds under Lavin.  Both things are true. https://www.zagsblog.com/2015/01/11/st-johns-minnesota-recruiting-2016-guard-shamorie-ponds-hard/ 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 23, 2020, 11:03:21 PM
I thought you called it worse than mullin and norms staff?

You're right I did. My statement now just now doesn't eradicate nor contradict that either.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 23, 2020, 11:06:22 PM
People don’t want to hear this but Ponds, LoVett, Yakwe, and Mussini came to SJU curtesy of the Lavin regime. Then look who we began to land out of HS, Trimble, Earlington, Roberts, and Williams. We had no one but Mack committed for the 2019 class. We had one recruiter who didn’t spend much time in HS’s.



Lavin deserves some credit for making inroads but Mullin's staff deserves credit for closing.

As for '19 class Mullin and staff were out the door and stopped recruiting. We would have had more commitments if Mullin got an extension.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 23, 2020, 11:08:45 PM
Really? How dumb is my take Dave?

Trying to argue with me on posts I don't even make. Sheesh
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on January 23, 2020, 11:50:18 PM
People don’t want to hear this but Ponds, LoVett, Yakwe, and Mussini came to SJU curtesy of the Lavin regime.

Uhhh, no. The vast majority of the time players commit to coaches not to schools. Giving Lavin even a little credit for any of those guys is absurd.

Thinking Mullin was a bad coach and/or recruiter is fine. You don't need to make ridiculous statements like that to support your cause.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 24, 2020, 12:17:43 AM
Trying to argue with me on posts I don't even make. Sheesh

I wasn’t arguing with you, but asking you to chime in on what the poster said was dumb.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 24, 2020, 12:21:26 AM
I don’t hate Mullin. Last year was the best he was going to get us. We can be better than losing in the play in game every 4 years. That was our ceiling. His recruiting philosophy and not emphasizing defense and rebounding was not gonna cut it.

He had one of the greatest scorers in SJU history playing along with 4 & 5 star recruits and couldn’t generate a .500 record in BE play? He’s not getting another Ponds, mainly because they weren’t recruiting HS kids. This year was gonna be rough regardless of who the coach was.

Do you believe Mullin was going to bring us to the NCAA tournament this year if he was retained?
I don't know. None of us do and we never will.  Not withstanding the unusual certainty with which you write about a present that didn't happen and a future that never will.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 24, 2020, 12:23:25 AM
Lavin deserves some credit for making inroads but Mullin's staff deserves credit for closing.

As for '19 class Mullin and staff were out the door and stopped recruiting. We would have had more commitments if Mullin got an extension.

He deserves credit for closing most certainly.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 24, 2020, 02:04:11 AM
I don't know. None of us do and we never will.  Not withstanding the unusual certainty with which you write about a present that didn't happen and a future that never will.

I’m asking what you believe. Such as do you believe in God. None of us know for certain, but it doesn’t prevent you from proclaiming your belief.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 24, 2020, 02:53:44 AM
Uhhh, no. The vast majority of the time players commit to coaches not to schools. Giving Lavin even a little credit for any of those guys is absurd.

In general yes however they hadn’t committed yet, but was already leaning SJU. The opportunity to play in MSG and learn from two hall of fame players had to be enticing. Little did they know. You think Mullin traveled to Milan to recruit Mussini?

Give them credit for closing, why wouldn’t the staff follow up on players who was showing interest in the school? Ponds was under recruited. St. John’s was a good move for him regardless of the coach. Lavin was gonna bring in some players trust that. He did a good job selling the program, not himself.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on January 24, 2020, 04:45:46 AM
Yes, Chiles and Lav were recruiting Ponds. They had a good relationship. Was not a done deal.
Once Mullin was hired, new staff made recruiting him a priority and the Ponds family was in.

Mullin and Co. brought in talent. More talent than Mike Anderson will ever get to Queens. If his teams would've stayed together, especially Lovett and Owens, we would all be signing a different tune. Yes, retaining a full roster was where he failed and led to the lack of depth. We will see if Anderson can do more with less. TBD.

 We would be looking at a Curbello and CJ Wilcher backcourt next yr. Not to take anything away from Posh and Wusu, but these guys are a step above.

I thought Mullin was finding his coaching groove at many points last yr. Heron hurt his knee and Ponds broke down end of the season. He won 21 games, should've been 9-9 in conference and 3rd place. I think we all expected more though. We deserved it. Dixon leaving and Keita hurting his knee which he never recovered from also put a dent into things. The fact they didn't add a piece or two in the offseason was confusing.

Mullin really deserved a real AD. The guy bleeds St. John's. His whole family went here. Even his kids. He wasn't devoid of blame. He could've and should've done a few things differently. Would like to have seen him and Cragg elevating the brand together. Oh well.







Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 24, 2020, 05:50:54 AM


You can’t develop and sustain a winning tradition off of transfers alone imo.

Transfers alone? In just Mullin’s last season had three high school kids.

Anderson loves transfers. He has two transfers committed already for next year and has offered at least one of Cole’s JUCO teammates. Are we in full blown bizzarro world now? We will almost cetainly grab a grad transfer too and, all told, we may be looking at 4-5 transfers total depending on who leaves. 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on January 24, 2020, 06:30:31 AM
Yes, Chiles and Lav were recruiting Ponds. They had a good relationship. Was not a done deal.
Once Mullin was hired, new staff made recruiting him a priority and the Ponds family was in.

Mullin and Co. brought in talent. More talent than Mike Anderson will ever get to Queens. If his teams would've stayed together, especially Lovett and Owens, we would all be signing a different tune. Yes, retaining a full roster was where he failed and led to the lack of depth. We will see if Anderson can do more with less. TBD.

 We would be looking at a Curbello and CJ Wilcher backcourt next yr. Not to take anything away from Posh and Wusu, but these guys are a step above.

I thought Mullin was finding his coaching groove at many points last yr. Heron hurt his knee and Ponds broke down end of the season. He won 21 games, should've been 9-9 in conference and 3rd place. I think we all expected more though. We deserved it. Dixon leaving and Keita hurting his knee which he never recovered from also put a dent into things. The fact they didn't add a piece or two in the offseason was confusing.

Mullin really deserved a real AD. The guy bleeds St. John's. His whole family went here. Even his kids. He wasn't devoid of blame. He could've and should've done a few things differently. Would like to have seen him and Cragg elevating the brand together. Oh well.

If, if, if. All hypothetical nonsense that you have no way of proving. What we do know is that Mullin had arguably the most talented team in the BE last year and couldn't even finish .500 in conference. Pretty sad and that's a fact. It wasn't confusing that they didn't add a piece. It was lazy garbage on behalf of Mullin for not being able to find one serviceable big. Just one.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on January 24, 2020, 06:35:24 AM
You're right I did. My statement now just now doesn't eradicate nor contradict that either.

No it doesn’t but I don’t remember it being complimentary either.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on January 24, 2020, 09:33:05 AM
Really? How dumb is my take Dave?

I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm a... fraid.

I'll field this one, I think Dave's busy. Your take is quite dumb. By the time Lavin left SJU when he wasn't scouring the south of France for program changers like Amar Alibeowitz he was recruiting kids on their way to prison and grinning sociopaths who wore their shorts pulled up over their ears and exchanging transcripts with corrupt academics in darkened parking lots. He was not recruiting at a high level and had not been for several years.

I'd hope that Chiles was recruiting various HS athletes, Ponds and whoever else, in NYC and elsewhere. That was after all his job. If we give Lavin credit for landing them, if some of them committed to some other school after Mullin got hired, does Lavin get credit for not landing them? Probably that's on Mullin, huh. Because Mullin bad. And if instead of hiring Mullin they'd rehired Norm and Ponds committed elsewhere that's probably be on Norm. Because Norm bad.

After SJ beat Syracuse Mullin's first year in a game where Mussini made five threes Mullin went out of his way to credit Louie for Mussini's recruitment. He said something like I don't speak Italian. In the post game classy Steve Lavin dismissed Lou's involvement and took credit for Mussini as "my guy." What might have happened do you think if Mussini had missed those threes. Probably he's Mullin's guy then huh. Because Mullin bad.

Rinse and repeat.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 24, 2020, 09:50:31 AM
I'm afraid. I'm afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm a... fraid.

I'll field this one, I think Dave's busy. Your take is quite dumb. By the time Lavin left SJU when he wasn't scouring the south of France for program changers like Amar Alibeowitz he was recruiting kids on their way to prison and grinning sociopaths who wore their shorts pulled up over their ears and exchanging transcripts with corrupt academics in darkened parking lots. He was not recruiting at a high level and had not been for several years.

I'd hope that Chiles was recruiting various HS athletes, Ponds and whoever else, in NYC and elsewhere. That was after all his job. If we give Lavin credit for landing them, if some of them committed to some other school after Mullin got hired, does Lavin get credit for not landing them? Probably that's on Mullin, huh. Because Mullin bad. And if instead of hiring Mullin they'd rehired Norm and Ponds committed elsewhere that's probably be on Norm. Because Norm bad.

After SJ beat Syracuse Mullin's first year in a game where Mussini made five threes Mullin went out of his way to credit Louie for Mussini's recruitment. He said something like I don't speak Italian. In the post game classy Steve Lavin dismissed Lou's involvement and took credit for Mussini as "my guy." What might have happened do you think if Mussini had missed those threes. Probably he's Mullin's guy then huh. Because Mullin bad.

Rinse and repeat.
One of the few things we have agreed on was missini as you named him sucked. I give mullin plenty of credit for bringing him in. Lavin targeted him he deserves blame. They can also share blame for the German. Both recuited him here. And both get blame for amar. Both recruited him here.
Foady at least you are trying to win an argument with your non sense.
Ready2rumble really believes mullin was doing a good job. That’s the scariest thing I have heard in a long time. Coach fxck you was in a coaching groove? Can’t make that shit up.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on January 24, 2020, 10:34:48 AM
 I’m not saying Mullin could not have turned things around, But besides staff make up , two other things turned off many fans, one was his lack of recruiting and two was all the time he spent in California. Regarding Anderson, he is a hard worker, put together a nice staff, but I am going to wait until next year to evaluated him, can’t get a true handle on him yet.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 24, 2020, 10:42:20 AM
The thing with Mussini was he was forced to play too much too soon at PG on a very bad team.

A year later he had a reduced role and his efficiency increased a lot. He played 10 less mpg and averaged 2 less ppg. His 3pt% increased a ton.

He was only a sophomore. Coaching staff should have done more to keep him happy it was an area that they struggled mightily.

Look at a guy like Sean McDermott for Butler or Colin Gillespie for Villanova. Both I wouldn't consider strong defenders or physically imposing but each has made strides as they became upperclassmen.

Mussini as a junior and senior playing along side Ponds, Lovett, Simon would have been way better than Bryan Trimble or Mikey Dixon.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on January 24, 2020, 12:14:38 PM

Mussini as a junior and senior playing along side Ponds, Lovett, Simon would have been way better than Bryan Trimble or Mikey Dixon.

+100
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 24, 2020, 12:25:12 PM
The thing with Mussini was he was forced to play too much too soon at PG on a very bad team.

A year later he had a reduced role and his efficiency increased a lot. He played 10 less mpg and averaged 2 less ppg. His 3pt% increased a ton.

He was only a sophomore. Coaching staff should have done more to keep him happy it was an area that they struggled mightily.

Look at a guy like Sean McDermott for Butler or Colin Gillespie for Villanova. Both I wouldn't consider strong defenders or physically imposing but each has made strides as they became upperclassmen.

Mussini as a junior and senior playing along side Ponds, Lovett, Simon would have been way better than Bryan Trimble or Mikey Dixon.

I agree with you about Mussini being an asset, but Gillespie and McDermott are on another planet than Mussini athletically.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 24, 2020, 12:34:48 PM
Mussini was 150 pounds. Compared to other big east guards he was to slow, to short, and and not strong enough. The fact that he couldn’t even be a back up PG made recruiting him, whoever you blame for it a huge mistake. Imagine playing him and ponds at the same time, they would give up a 100 points a game.

Look at Marquette, 2 years ago they had Howard and Andrew rousey (who was way better then mussini) they scored plenty but didn’t win many games.

Mussini like Clarke accumulated stats but shouldn’t have been here. Guys like that were the reason we lost. How many big east games did either guy help us win?

Earlington everyone loves (I like him to). He plays hard and smart. But he is a liability. On a good team he isn’t playing. He gets his shot blocked like 3 times every game. How many rebounds would a taller player get? Unlike the other 2 he gets the most out of his ability and competes. It’s just tough to win with a guy like him playing 20 minutes a game.
And he is one of our better players.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 24, 2020, 12:51:55 PM
I’m asking what you believe. Such as do you believe in God. None of us know for certain, but it doesn’t prevent you from proclaiming your belief.
Ok. I believe we would have made the Ncaa's this year under coach Mullin.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 24, 2020, 12:56:44 PM
two other things turned off many fans, 
I don't think even one other thing turned off many fans as they showed up in droves and attendance was through the roof.  Unless in today's day and age a characteristic of turned off fans is purchasing tickets to basketball games.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 24, 2020, 01:06:15 PM
I don't think even one other thing turned off many fans as they showed up in droves and attendance was through the roof.  Unless in today's day and age a characteristic of turned off fans is purchasing tickets to basketball games.
That’s actually true. For the most part NYC wanted to see Chris mullin. However fans who pay attention besides the 8 left on here knew he was a fraud.
I don’t check redmen.com very often. But I would bet Chris mullin is not a topic of conversation. They know he failed and have moved on.
Plenty of St. John’s fans on Twitter. Coach mullin isn’t very popular there.
The rest of the big east teams fan sites look at Anderson as a huge upgrade.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on January 24, 2020, 02:05:57 PM
Ok. I believe we would have made the Ncaa's this year under coach Mullin.
Thanks for proving the old axiom that it is better to remain silent and have people think you an idiot than to speak up and remove all doubt.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on January 24, 2020, 02:29:58 PM
I don't think even one other thing turned off many fans as they showed up in droves and attendance was through the roof.  Unless in today's day and age a characteristic of turned off fans is purchasing tickets to basketball games.
So you are telling me that you were happy w Mullins staff makeup, his , not Matt’s, recruiting and the time  he spent on campus during the summer months ?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 24, 2020, 02:47:17 PM
Thanks for proving the old axiom that it is better to remain silent and have people think you an idiot than to speak up and remove all doubt.
He pressed me for an answer so I gave one. Making predictions about non existing presents and futures not a strong point.

Astute, spot on, truthful, unbiased real time analysis of past and present events and situations pertaining to St. John's basketball is my forte.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 24, 2020, 02:48:26 PM
So you are telling me that you were happy w Mullins staff makeup, his , not Matt’s, recruiting and the time  he spent on campus during the summer months ?
I will answer for carmine. He will tell you neither he nor you are at practice. So who knows what the assistants do. 2 hall of famers are better then one. He will ignore the California part of your post. As of yet carmine has not figured out a way to explain the fact that mullin lives in California.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 24, 2020, 02:51:57 PM
So you are telling me that you were happy w Mullins staff makeup, his , not Matt’s, recruiting and the time  he spent on campus during the summer months ?
I don't concern myself much about assistant coaches. I think it's difficult to judge what they do and don't do unless you're really close to and involved with the program which I'm not.

I give all the credit, and blame, to the head coach as it's warranted.  I will say that losing Slice was probably a blow. Seems like a shame that he and Matt couldn't play nicer together in the sandbox.

I don't know what was done and not done by Chris over the summer months.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 24, 2020, 02:53:01 PM
I agree with you about Mussini being an asset, but Gillespie and McDermott are on another planet than Mussini athletically.

How so?

If there is any difference its marginal. Maturation has helped Gillespie (more comparable size wise) put on some muscle to help him take contact and defensively but still he's not upper echelon athletically but still makes significant impact for his team. 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 24, 2020, 02:53:26 PM
I will answer for carmine. 
Please don't as you and I are polar opposites.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 24, 2020, 02:58:32 PM
Mussini was 150 pounds. Compared to other big east guards he was to slow, to short, and and not strong enough. The fact that he couldn’t even be a back up PG made recruiting him, whoever you blame for it a huge mistake. Imagine playing him and ponds at the same time, they would give up a 100 points a game.

Look at Marquette, 2 years ago they had Howard and Andrew rousey (who was way better then mussini) they scored plenty but didn’t win many games.

Mussini like Clarke accumulated stats but shouldn’t have been here. Guys like that were the reason we lost. How many big east games did either guy help us win?

Earlington everyone loves (I like him to). He plays hard and smart. But he is a liability. On a good team he isn’t playing. He gets his shot blocked like 3 times every game. How many rebounds would a taller player get? Unlike the other 2 he gets the most out of his ability and competes. It’s just tough to win with a guy like him playing 20 minutes a game.
And he is one of our better players.

Marquette won 19 and 21 games respectively and finished 4th and 6th in conference. Sign me up!!  Additionally we're comparing Rousey who led them in scoring and minutes vs Mussini who we saying as 3rd guard, 6th man.

I think this further proves my point that he could have been valuable asset as an upperclassmen.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on January 24, 2020, 02:59:27 PM
I don't concern myself much about assistant coaches. I think it's difficult to judge what they do and don't do unless you're really close to and involved with the program which I'm not.

I give all the credit, and blame, to the head coach as it's warranted.  I will say that losing Slice was probably a blow. Seems like a shame that he and Matt couldn't play nicer together in the sandbox.

I don't know what was done and not done by Chris over the summer months.
Mitch had no  coaching experience. Although, I too am not close to the program, and far from a bb expert, moving him to top assistant coupled w Mullins inexperience was not the smartest move. Regarding the summer months, he wasn’t coaching the players, he wasn’t going to AAU events and he wasn’t recruiting. I do not believe to many people would dispute that.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 24, 2020, 03:00:44 PM
Tony... also to your criticisms of Earlington.

He's a sophomore off the bench who barely played as a freshman. He's leading the team in FG% and provides a spark nearly all the time.

Through the moon with what he brings to the table and how he's progressing. What is the problem?!?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 24, 2020, 03:02:41 PM
I don't concern myself much about assistant coaches. I think it's difficult to judge what they do and don't do unless you're really close to and involved with the program which I'm not.

I give all the credit, and blame, to the head coach as it's warranted.  I will say that losing Slice was probably a blow. Seems like a shame that he and Matt couldn't play nicer together in the sandbox.

I don't know what was done and not done by Chris over the summer months.

Assistant coaches are equally if not more important than head coach in most instances. You need to have strong assistants 1-3 and support staff in order to be successful head coach.

Coach K wouldn't be Coach K without all the support staff and work his assistants do.

Additionally school providing resources like charter flights, meals, etc all matter.

We haven't had a good strength coach since Pat Dixon left and it shows.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 24, 2020, 03:05:00 PM
Tony... also to your criticisms of Earlington.

He's a sophomore off the bench who barely played as a freshman. He's leading the team in FG% and provides a spark nearly all the time.

Through the moon with what he brings to the table and how he's progressing. What is the problem?!?
We are 1-5 that is the problem. I like earlington, Rutherford, and even caraher as players. They give us everything they have. They play smart.
But We are losing because of them. They are not good enough. Maybe if we had one of them. But all 3.
Dunn is one of our best players and he should be a backup.
I am tired of losing.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: longtimefan on January 24, 2020, 03:23:18 PM
Poor baby. Get some sleep and maybe you won't be so tired. This is not all about how you feel. Try to imagine how the players feel about losing.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 24, 2020, 03:26:50 PM
Marquette won 19 and 21 games respectively and finished 4th and 6th in conference. Sign me up!!  Additionally we're comparing Rousey who led them in scoring and minutes vs Mussini who we saying as 3rd guard, 6th man.

I think this further proves my point that he could have been valuable asset as an upperclassmen.
Had this conversation with Marquette fans at the big east. We all agreed rousey was great player. They were happy he was leaving because they couldn’t stop anyone with him. They expected to do better the following year without him. And the did. 2nd in conference.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on January 24, 2020, 03:37:02 PM
If, if, if. All hypothetical nonsense that you have no way of proving. What we do know is that Mullin had arguably the most talented team in the BE last year and couldn't even finish .500 in conference. Pretty sad and that's a fact. It wasn't confusing that they didn't add a piece. It was lazy garbage on behalf of Mullin for not being able to find one serviceable big. Just one.

I see you're still hanging from my sack. Go cry on twitter again and make a poll. If you want to make it personal, like i told another poster... let's meet at a game.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 24, 2020, 04:14:11 PM
I see you're still hanging from my sack. Go cry on twitter again and make a poll. If you want to make it personal, like i told another poster... let's meet at a game.
You saw that poll? I voted for you
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: cjfish on January 24, 2020, 04:28:36 PM
We are 1-5 that is the problem. I like earlington, Rutherford, and even caraher as players. They give us everything they have. They play smart.
But We are losing because of them. They are not good enough. Maybe if we had one of them. But all 3.
Dunn is one of our best players and he should be a backup.
I am tired of losing.



Dunn is bad more than he is good. Takes bad shots leading to bad % and often drives into too much traffic.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on January 24, 2020, 04:37:49 PM
Transfers alone? In just Mullin’s last season had three high school kids.

Anderson loves transfers. He has two transfers committed already for next year and has offered at least one of Cole’s JUCO teammates. Are we in full blown bizzarro world now? We will almost cetainly grab a grad transfer too and, all told, we may be looking at 4-5 transfers total depending on who leaves. 

There’s nothing wrong with transfers in general, but it appeared that the staff was looking primarily at transfers then after using HS to fill out the roster. Problem with that strategy is you don’t know who’s going to be in the transfer portal and by that time most of the quality HS talent is off the board and your left with projects like Williams, Roberts, and Earlington.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on January 24, 2020, 04:58:44 PM



Dunn is bad more than he is good. Takes bad shots leading to bad % and often drives into too much traffic.
I wouldn’t say Dunn is bad. I would agree he is inefficient and tries to do too much relative to his skill set.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 24, 2020, 11:44:28 PM
We are 1-5 that is the problem. I like earlington, Rutherford, and even caraher as players. They give us everything they have. They play smart.
But We are losing because of them. They are not good enough. Maybe if we had one of them. But all 3.
Dunn is one of our best players and he should be a backup.
I am tired of losing.

So now we are losing because of players who are 8th and 9th in minutes played on the team? How about we upgrade players 3 through 5?

 I'm not going to include Rutherford in this conversation bc we all know he is stopgap and subpar.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 24, 2020, 11:50:48 PM
There’s nothing wrong with transfers in general, but it appeared that the staff was looking primarily at transfers then after using HS to fill out the roster. Problem with that strategy is you don’t know who’s going to be in the transfer portal and by that time most of the quality HS talent is off the board and your left with projects like Williams, Roberts, and Earlington.

While technically you're right but you do have a good idea early who is loose. For example everyone knew Isaiah Washington was gonna bounce from Minnesota the moment he committed.

However you can be solely reliant or heavily dependent on transfers.

I do think the balance was going to shift to hs as the team continued to have success.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 25, 2020, 12:18:59 AM
So now we are losing because of players who are 8th and 9th in minutes played on the team? How about we upgrade players 3 through 5?

 I'm not going to include Rutherford in this conversation bc we all know he is stopgap and subpar.
I wish there was a plus minus stat. We are losing close games. From watching it looks like we are losing with our drive team
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 25, 2020, 01:11:38 AM
I wish there was a plus minus stat. We are losing close games. From watching it looks like we are losing with our drive team

I'll see what I can dig up for you. 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: BannerMountainMan on January 25, 2020, 12:45:37 PM
Yeah I could see SJUBB having 6 newcomers, Cole, Posh, Wusu, Moore, Pickney, and Rand.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 25, 2020, 12:55:37 PM
Yeah I could see SJUBB having 6 newcomers, Cole, Posh, Wusu, Moore, Pickney, and Rand.
Plus PG that is hurt.
Why is wusu rated so low? His stats are good. Supposedly a great athlete and can shoot? I asked same question on Twitter. Answer I got was his rating was going up
Title: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 26, 2020, 09:38:32 PM
That would make a bunch of people cry. 
You're projecting your own feelings about last season under Mullin onto others.  ALL posters here want the team to win.
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: TONYD3 on January 26, 2020, 09:51:15 PM
You're projecting your own feelings about last season under Mullin onto others.  ALL posters here want the team to win.

How come you didn’t contradict Marillac when he said Mullin was a terrible hire and awful coach?
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 26, 2020, 09:55:44 PM
We are 2-5 in conference. 
I know you struggle mightily with the wins...hyphen...losses format, but we're 2 and 6.
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 26, 2020, 10:01:27 PM
How come you didn’t contradict Marillac when he said Mullin was a terrible hire and awful coach?
I must have missed that. If he said he was a terrible hire, I agree with that. Anyone would have been a terrible hire at that point. We should have stayed with Hollywood. I don't agree he was an awful coach.  He was a novice coach that improved the team all 4 seasons and had one terrific one in his finale. 

P.S. Don't initiated Mullin- Anderson debate with me here. Dave hates that. This is a game thread. Bring it to the appropriate thread where people with half a brain or lives have the good sense not to venture into.
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: TONYD3 on January 26, 2020, 10:01:43 PM
I know you struggle mightily with the wins...hyphen...losses format, but we're 2 and 6.
20-59 is still correct?
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 26, 2020, 10:07:16 PM
20-59 is still correct?
Which is still better than 2-6 percentage wise. Sorry for the advanced mathematics.
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: TONYD3 on January 26, 2020, 10:14:00 PM
Which is still better than 2-6 percentage wise. Sorry for the advanced mathematics.
True. But Mullin was 0-8 with 8 knockouts after 8 games
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 27, 2020, 12:34:47 AM
True. But Mullin was 0-8 with 8 knockouts after 8 games
You're out of your freakin mind. I don't know what the hell your talking about.
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: Rodman on January 27, 2020, 02:51:25 AM
You're projecting your own feelings about last season under Mullin onto others.  ALL posters here want the team to win.


What gives you the authority to speak for all posters?  Did God tell you that?
Title: Re: Re: Nova 1/28
Post by: TONYD3 on January 27, 2020, 06:10:24 AM
What gives you the authority to speak for all posters?  Did God tell you that?
Carmine speaks the truth
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on January 27, 2020, 11:32:15 AM
Why is the Nova thread locked, people were actually talking about the game hahaha.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on January 27, 2020, 12:18:30 PM
Why is the Nova thread locked, people were actually talking about the game hahaha.

Looks like one of the mods moved and merged some irrelevant conversation from the nova thread to here.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on January 27, 2020, 12:56:55 PM
Looks like one of the mods moved and merged some irrelevant conversation from the nova thread to here.

Thanks for fixing it!
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 27, 2020, 02:25:21 PM
What gives you the authority to speak for all posters?  Did God tell you that?
Nothing. "I fight authority, but authority always wins."

I haven't surveyed all posters and I have seen times in the past when purported St. John's fans have rooted for the team to lose. From my daily read of this board I don't get the sense that it's happening now. CFC is in his honeymoon phase where he gets full support. On the interweb only of course. Nobody is going to the games. I'm in a slump myself.  I haven't been live since our early season sojourn through the America East
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 27, 2020, 02:32:42 PM
Nothing. "I fight authority, but authority always wins."

I haven't surveyed all posters and I have seen times in the past when purported St. John's fans have rooted for the team to lose. From my daily read of this board I don't get the sense that it's happening now. CFC is in his honeymoon phase where he gets full support. On the interweb only of course. Nobody is going to the games. I'm in a slump myself.  I haven't been live since our early season sojourn through the America East
Seton hall was a nice crowd. 65-35 St. John’s. Lower deck was full. One side had plenty of people in second deck. Mostly seton hall fans.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on January 27, 2020, 02:37:08 PM
Nothing. "I fight authority, but authority always wins."

I haven't surveyed all posters and I have seen times in the past when purported St. John's fans have rooted for the team to lose. From my daily read of this board I don't get the sense that it's happening now. CFC is in his honeymoon phase where he gets full support. On the interweb only of course. Nobody is going to the games. I'm in a slump myself.  I haven't been live since our early season sojourn through the America East
With the amount of criticism CMA is receiving on this board hard to characterize this as a honeymoon faze.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 29, 2020, 08:11:42 AM
With the amount of criticism CMA is receiving on this board hard to characterize this as a honeymoon faze.
What criticism? I've seen some very mild questioning of his ability to recruit but that's about it.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on January 29, 2020, 11:26:15 AM
What criticism? I've seen some very mild questioning of his ability to recruit but that's about it.
Where and at what time will you be appearing? I'd love to catch your act in person because you are hilarious.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on January 30, 2020, 12:27:40 AM
Where and at what time will you be appearing? I'd love to catch your act in person because you are hilarious.
I'll be here all week.  Don't forget to tip your waitresses and bartenders.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 30, 2020, 10:48:33 AM
Where and at what time will you be appearing? I'd love to catch your act in person because you are hilarious.

Everyone is hilarious compared to you.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on January 30, 2020, 04:18:25 PM
Everyone is hilarious compared to you.
and everyone is a basketball savant compared to you.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on January 30, 2020, 05:12:31 PM
One thing between the 2 staffs , it is amazing how much more the collective coaching experience is on Anderson’s staff relative to Mullins.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on January 31, 2020, 11:40:06 AM
One thing between the 2 staffs , it is amazing how much more the collective coaching experience is on Anderson’s staff relative to Mullins.

And you got this perspective from?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on January 31, 2020, 11:51:05 AM
And you got this perspective from?


From their resumes. There is really no arguing this. We need to learn to concede to objective facts and stipulate to obvious observations.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on January 31, 2020, 12:19:23 PM
From their resumes. There is really no arguing this. We need to learn to concede to objective facts and stipulate to obvious observations.
Pure comedy.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 03, 2020, 12:56:19 AM
Question for the Razorback fans

Has the Anderson family always been opinionated in public and involved in the  baksetball program?

Today at the Garden I noticed Anderson's wife  trying to get involved in the ruling on the LJ and Pickett incident. She was out of her seat and in the area of the monitor review... she was asked to return to her seat.

A friend pointed out that Mike Anderson Jr. was on Twitter on the St. John's thread calling out the shooting and lack of talent.

Another relative was also telling fans to not voice their opinion and calling fans "piglets".

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 09, 2020, 10:24:21 PM
So this season is no Ncaa tournament bid. Next season is no tournament bid either as teams don't go from 4 -14 to 9 - 9 in one year depending on so many freshmen. The very BEST we can hope for is that CFC dances in year three, and that's being very wishful, to tie coach Mullins achievement here.

The traitors are going to owe our legend one grand apology.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 10, 2020, 10:19:24 AM
So this season is no Ncaa tournament bid. Next season is no tournament bid either as teams don't go from 4 -14 to 9 - 9 in one year depending on so many freshmen. The very BEST we can hope for is that CFC dances in year three, and that's being very wishful, to tie coach Mullins achievement here.

The traitors are going to owe our legend one grand apology.

No we wouldn’t. We needed to move on regardless of how Anderson preforms here.

It may very well take Anderson until year three to make the NCAA tournament. That’s what happens when you inherit a program that is in need of rebuilding.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on February 10, 2020, 11:23:59 AM
So this season is no Ncaa tournament bid. Next season is no tournament bid either as teams don't go from 4 -14 to 9 - 9 in one year depending on so many freshmen. The very BEST we can hope for is that CFC dances in year three, and that's being very wishful, to tie coach Mullins achievement here.

The traitors are going to owe our legend one grand apology.

I hope Mullin knows you and appreciates your support.  The blind loyalty you show for him admirable as it is annoying.

I don’t think Mullin really cares anymore one or the other about the basketball program.

He left NYC 40 years ago only to comeback here for five years, just to go back California. He’s a West Coaster born in Brooklyn.

SJU alumni in general acts like a bunch of Uncle Rico’s  who only remember the 80s and the would’ve could’ve should’ve of that period.

Mullin wasn’t going to work out here because of the disunion of the AD and him. Mullin went for the power play of going above Cragg’s head and failed. This would have been a tension filled season anyways because those two could not exist in the same organization.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 01:17:45 PM
I hope Mullin knows you and appreciates your support.  The blind loyalty you show for him admirable as it is annoying.

I don’t think Mullin really cares anymore one or the other about the basketball program.

He left NYC 40 years ago only to comeback here for five years, just to go back California. He’s a West Coaster born in Brooklyn.

SJU alumni in general acts like a bunch of Uncle Rico’s  who only remember the 80s and the would’ve could’ve should’ve of that period.

Mullin wasn’t going to work out here because of the disunion of the AD and him. Mullin went for the power play of going above Cragg’s head and failed. This would have been a tension filled season anyways because those two could not exist in the same organization.
I know you want to say it. Mullin is a bum
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 10, 2020, 01:45:56 PM
No we wouldn’t. We needed to move on regardless of how Anderson preforms here.

It may very well take Anderson until year three to make the NCAA tournament. That’s what happens when you inherit a program that is in need of rebuilding.

Why did we need to move on?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 10, 2020, 01:51:06 PM
Why did we need to move on?

Because last year's team had the most talented roster in the Big East, in the most down year for the BE in forever, and still finished in 7th place and below .500 in conference. And that was Mullin's best year.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 10, 2020, 02:09:42 PM
Because last year's team had the most talented roster in the Big East, in the most down year for the BE in forever, and still finished in 7th place and below .500 in conference. And that was Mullin's best year.



 They had zero plan to move on from Mullin. You move on when you have an actual target. Cragg got played like an amateur. The process was an absolute joke.

 Anderson was an unimpressive hire. His career had been trending downward. His recruiting will leave at lot to be desired. I had no problem with moving on if they made a strong hire. This was not. The program is dead. No buzz anywhere. Look at the recruits at our games... there are none. They aren't making inroads. It will be JUCOs with an imbalanced roster.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 10, 2020, 02:51:01 PM
Because last year's team had the most talented roster in the Big East

How was a team that had no depth and no big man the most talented in the Big East? Perhaps you meant to say most talented starting five but even that's questionable. Was SJU's starting five > Howard, the Hauser twins and Theo John? Powell, Cale, McKnight, Nzei and Mamaluke? Booth, Pasquall, Gillespie, Bey?

Last year Villanova had six RSCI top 100 kids, Marquette had five, Creighton had four and Xavier G'town and Seton Hall had three, as did SJU and one of their top 100 is evidently a bum who's singlehandedly responsible for pulling Coach Home Run into the toilet. Stop acting like Mullin was running Murderer's Row out there, because he wasn't. He had Ponds and Simon three other guys and then Bryan Trimble.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 10, 2020, 03:03:27 PM
How was a team that had no depth and no big man the most talented in the Big East? Perhaps you meant to say most talented starting five but even that's questionable. Was SJU's starting five > Howard, the Hauser twins and Theo John? Powell, Cale, McKnight, Nzei and Mamaluke? Booth, Pasquall, Gillespie, Bey?

Last year Villanova had six RSCI top 100 kids, Marquette had five, Creighton had four and Xavier G'town and Seton Hall had three, as did SJU and one of their top 100 is evidently a bum who's singlehandedly responsible for pulling Coach Home Run into the toilet. Stop acting like Mullin was running Murderer's Row out there, because he wasn't. He had Ponds and Simon three other guys and then Bryan Trimble.

Being that the original question that I replied to was "why did we need to move on" from Mullin, your first two comments only further cement why we needed to. No depth and especially no big man were both knocks on the hall of fame player. Further supporting why we needed to move on. We could argue the most talented, or the 2nd most talented or 3rd most talented last year. Bottom line is they're all just more reasons why he wasn't getting the job done.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 03:26:03 PM


 They had zero plan to move on from Mullin. You move on when you have an actual target. Cragg got played like an amateur. The process was an absolute joke.

 Anderson was an unimpressive hire. His career had been trending downward. His recruiting will leave at lot to be desired. I had no problem with moving on if they made a strong hire. This was not. The program is dead. No buzz anywhere. Look at the recruits at our games... there are none. They aren't making inroads. It will be JUCOs with an imbalanced roster.
Their was a clear plan. Fire mullin, and hire someone who has experience and will do the job professionally and take the position seriously.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 10, 2020, 04:13:16 PM
Being that the original question that I replied to was "why did we need to move on" from Mullin, your first two comments only further cement why we needed to. No depth and especially no big man were both knocks on the hall of fame player. Further supporting why we needed to move on. We could argue the most talented, or the 2nd most talented or 3rd most talented last year. Bottom line is they're all just more reasons why he wasn't getting the job done.

I don't agree with the "need to move on" proposition for a number of reasons, mostly because firing every coach who makes the NCAA tournament is counterproductive. I think there were minor tweaks - to the system,  to the staff - that might have improved things. Still, I understand the reasoning of those that thought Mullin had to go.

What I don't understand is the need to guild the lily. Because if things were that bad you don't need to make things up to make them worse. For example this bit of nonsense:

St John's had the best roster in the league last year, despite the fact that they had no depth and no height, which lack of depth and height was detrimental to the roster and that's on Mullin

How is all of that true? It isn't. It can't be.

And if it is (and it can't be) how are we nine months later rebuilding when 40 percent of the best roster in the league is back?

So we had to move on because Mullin recruited the best roster in the league and made the NCAA tournament? Okay, so if coming in 7th and making the tournament is bad what's good about ninth place? Oh that's right, we're instilling a culture. Which culture you know we're instilling because you're there in the huddle. In the locker room. In the trenches.

Idea: just say Chris Mullin needed to go because I hated Chris Mullin. Be honest. Stop trying to rationalize your emotions. Stop trying to justify them. Hatred is good. It's our friend. Just cop to it. It's liberating. I hated Steve Lavin and was happy when he was fired despite what little success he had. Because I loathed him. Although in retrospect they never should have fired him. Because they fired the next guy and inevitably they'll fire this guy, assuming he makes the tournament obviously.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 10, 2020, 04:26:58 PM
I don't agree with the "need to move on" proposition for a number of reasons, mostly because firing every coach who makes the NCAA tournament is counterproductive. I think there were minor tweaks - to the system,  to the staff - that might have improved things. Still, I understand the reasoning of those that thought Mullin had to go.

What I don't understand is the need to guild the lily. Because if things were that bad you don't need to make things up to make them worse. For example this bit of nonsense:

St John's had the best roster in the league last year, despite the fact that they had no depth and no height, which lack of depth and height was detrimental to the roster and that's on Mullin

How is all of that true? It isn't. It can't be.

And if it is (and it can't be) how are we nine months later rebuilding when 40 percent of the best roster in the league is back?

So we had to move on because Mullin recruited the best roster in the league and made the NCAA tournament? Okay, so if coming in 7th and making the tournament is bad what's good about ninth place? Oh that's right, we're instilling a culture. Which culture you know we're instilling because you're there in the huddle. In the locker room. In the trenches.

Idea: just say Chris Mullin needed to go because I hated Chris Mullin. Be honest. Stop trying to rationalize your emotions. Stop trying to justify them. Hatred is good. It's our friend. Just cop to it. It's liberating. I hated Steve Lavin and was happy when he was fired despite what little success he had. Because I loathed him. Although in retrospect they never should have fired him. Because they fired the next guy and inevitably they'll fire this guy, assuming he makes the tournament obviously.

No need to rationalize my emotions when the facts are there for all to see. Coming in 7th in a weak BE. That's a fact. You don't want to admit it but we barely got into the tourney last year. In fact, we were the last team in the field. We were then unceremoniously trounced in an shoddy performance in one of the first 4 games on a tues or wed night before the full slate of games began on Thursday.

Simon was DPOY in the BE last year. Ponds was 1st team All BE last year I believe. I don't think either LJ or Heron is on track to make any of the All BE teams this year. Last year's team was much more talented. And then you bring up Ninth place this year? This is Anderson's first year. There were zero expectations for this season. Not sure how you could honestly compare his 9th place standing currently in Year 1 to Mullin's 7th place standing in Year 4 of his regime. That's not a comparison, that's a reach by you to make things look equal when they are not.

How is it not true that the lack of depth and lack of big man were not on Mullin last year? Who else could the blame fall on when the buck stops with the head coach?

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 04:29:52 PM
I don't agree with the "need to move on" proposition for a number of reasons, mostly because firing every coach who makes the NCAA tournament is counterproductive. I think there were minor tweaks - to the system,  to the staff - that might have improved things. Still, I understand the reasoning of those that thought Mullin had to go.

What I don't understand is the need to guild the lily. Because if things were that bad you don't need to make things up to make them worse. For example this bit of nonsense:

St John's had the best roster in the league last year, despite the fact that they had no depth and no height, which lack of depth and height was detrimental to the roster and that's on Mullin

How is all of that true? It isn't. It can't be.

And if it is (and it can't be) how are we nine months later rebuilding when 40 percent of the best roster in the league is back?

So we had to move on because Mullin recruited the best roster in the league and made the NCAA tournament? Okay, so if coming in 7th and making the tournament is bad what's good about ninth place? Oh that's right, we're instilling a culture. Which culture you know we're instilling because you're there in the huddle. In the locker room. In the trenches.

Idea: just say Chris Mullin needed to go because I hated Chris Mullin. Be honest. Stop trying to rationalize your emotions. Stop trying to justify them. Hatred is good. It's our friend. Just cop to it. It's liberating. I hated Steve Lavin and was happy when he was fired despite what little success he had. Because I loathed him. Although in retrospect they never should have fired him. Because they fired the next guy and inevitably they'll fire this guy, assuming he makes the tournament obviously.
You are making this complicated. It’s very simple. Was Chris Mullin a good coach? Did he hire a proper staff? Was he working hard enough? Were the results good enough? Did he do everything in his power to do the best job he could do?
Who cares if he was a novice, who cares if he got better.
The answer to every question in the first paragraph is no. You and your ilk finally conceded that the hero had flaws. Maybe just maybe we are still losing because of his flaws.
Nebraska is the worst team in the big 10. They have new coach? Did he like Anderson forget what the hell he was doing?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 10, 2020, 04:41:11 PM
How is it not true that the lack of depth and lack of big man were not on Mullin last year?

Last year's roster short comings were absolutely the fault of the head coach.

My turn: how is it true that we had the best roster in the BE if we were lacking in depth and lacking big men?

Don't bother responding, that's a rhetorical question.

Admit the hate. It's healthy.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 10, 2020, 04:46:05 PM
The answer to every question in the first paragraph is no.

I didn't ask any questions in the first paragraph? Or the second? Or the third? Hint: questions are followed by punctuation called question marks? Second hint: learn to count to four or look up the meaning of paragraph?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 10, 2020, 04:52:59 PM
Anderson would have won 3-4 conference games last year if he was our coach.

Ponds may have left mid-year to preserve his NBA chances.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: mullin85berry86 on February 10, 2020, 06:47:14 PM
Because last year's team had the most talented roster in the Big East, in the most down year for the BE in forever, and still finished in 7th place and below .500 in conference. And that was Mullin's best year.

Maybe the most talented starting 5, our bench was shit. Under lavin & mullin our bench was always shit. Imagine if we had 3 guys off the bench giving us 15-20 without much of a drop off? This year we have depth but the starting 5 isn't really that good.
Maybe one year we'll get it right.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: mullin85berry86 on February 10, 2020, 06:52:14 PM
Why did we need to move on?

What happened to Mullin going through the back doors at local h.s. to see top local kids?
That was all B.S. the sob just wanted to go back to cali in the summer and told lard ass to recruit everyone. Rather play horse with mitch.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 10, 2020, 07:49:04 PM
What happened to Mullin going through the back doors at local h.s. to see top local kids?
That was all B.S. the sob just wanted to go back to cali in the summer and told lard ass to recruit everyone. Rather play horse with mitch.

Do you know how people recruit these days? Imagine this concept... phone calls,texts and emails.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 08:01:54 PM
Do you know how people recruit these days? Imagine this concept... phone calls,texts and emails.
Andre curbello, the guy who you said was coming. Was quoted in a rivals or 24-7 article saying he never once spoke to Chris mullin.
If you are saying that it’s not important to get out and recruit. You are only lying to yourself. Besides being a terrible coach. He couldn’t even be the hero.
Patrick hired a real staff. Patrick recruits. Patrick has relationships with aau and Hs coaches. Patrick actually coaches. Patrick still has a job.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 10, 2020, 08:28:07 PM
Do you know how people recruit these days? Imagine this concept... phone calls,texts and emails.
Is that how you scout the players you want also?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 10, 2020, 08:29:22 PM
Things are not looking good. Hearing there is likely going to be mass exodus of players at end of year.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 08:36:14 PM
Things are not looking good. Hearing there is likely going to be mass exodus of players at end of year.
Explain yourself. Like who? Besides steer who looks un happy? They are losing but playing hard.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 08:36:52 PM
Is that how you scout the players you want also?
He won’t answer that
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 10, 2020, 08:40:41 PM
Explain yourself. Like who? Besides steer who looks un happy? They are losing but playing hard.

Idk about looking happy or unhappy but as many as 5 players.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 08:41:41 PM
Idk about looking happy or unhappy but as many as 5 players.
Like who? Where are the going to go?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on February 10, 2020, 08:48:42 PM
Idk about looking happy or unhappy but as many as 5 players.
Are these players that we want to recruit over or are these players we want to stay leaving?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: survivedc on February 10, 2020, 08:56:35 PM
Hope Williams and Roberts stay but I’d bet they both go.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 10, 2020, 09:02:02 PM
Like who? Where are the going to go?

Essentially everyone not recruited by this staff. Only one I didn't hear was Earlington
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 09:07:36 PM
Essentially everyone not recruited by this staff. Only one I didn't hear was Earlington
Not exactly shocking news. I hope Williams stays. His father seems happy with his son here.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 10, 2020, 09:27:22 PM
Essentially everyone not recruited by this staff. Only one I didn't hear was Earlington
Champaigne is one I wouldn't see as likely to transfer either or Dunn either for that matter.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 10, 2020, 09:37:43 PM
Is that how you scout the players you want also?

Socuting is done by support staff and assistants. Just like every other sport.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 09:39:53 PM
Socuting is done by support staff and assistants. Just like every other sport.
This guy was a NY hero. He could have been great here. He choose not to.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 10, 2020, 09:41:52 PM
Socuting is done by support staff and assistants. Just like every other sport.
Even Ole Roy Williams, Coach K and Patrick Ewing are regularly seen scouting HS games. Mullin did it his first year or two before he became a permanent west coaster again. Also absent all off season when NCAA allows for individual instruction for players which is why T. Owens left.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 10, 2020, 10:09:56 PM
Because last year's team had the most talented roster in the Big East, in the most down year for the BE in forever, and still finished in 7th place and below .500 in conference. And that was Mullin's best year.

Holy sh*t you are stupid. The most talented team? We didn’t have a single big man that could score in the paint. Not a PF and not a center. We didn’t have a single capable secondary ball-handler. We didn’t have a single big man that could defend and rebound.

Simon was so bad offensively that some teams literally chose not to defend him!

Oh, and we had no depth.

If you want to blame the staff for poor recruiting and poor roster construction...that is fine. To suggest we had a top roster is ‘tarded and not based in reality.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 10, 2020, 10:21:31 PM
Holy sh*t you are stupid. The most talented team? We didn’t have a single big man that could score in the paint. Not a PF and not a center. We didn’t have a single capable secondary ball-handler. We didn’t have a single big man that could defend and rebound.

Simon was so bad offensively that some teams literally chose not to defend him!

Oh, and we had no depth.

If you want to blame the staff for poor recruiting and poor roster construction...that is fine. To suggest we had a top roster is ‘tarded and not based in reality.
This is confusing, is their depth or not? Simon stinks and had no offensive game? He was a 5 star recruit, Mullin couldn’t have done anything to get him going?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 10, 2020, 10:23:47 PM
Holy sh*t you are stupid. The most talented team? We didn’t have a single big man that could score in the paint. Not a PF and not a center. We didn’t have a single capable secondary ball-handler. We didn’t have a single big man that could defend and rebound.

Simon was so bad offensively that some teams literally chose not to defend him!

Oh, and we had no depth.

If you want to blame the staff for poor recruiting and poor roster construction...that is fine. To suggest we had a top roster is ‘tarded and not based in reality.

Simon was DPOY in the BE so obviously he had talent. You could suck on offense and still be talented, el dopeo! Surely the roster was more talented than a 7th place, below .500 conference finish in a weak Big East. But don't let facts get in the way.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on February 10, 2020, 11:55:00 PM
I've been getting the feeling lately that Anderson doesn't have much of an interest in moving forward with the guys he didn't bring in here. I hope Roberts and Earlington stay as they clearly have much higher upside than Anderson guy Sears but Roberts lack of PT lately is puzzling and a bad sign.

If we're entering the offseason with just Anderson's guys plus Earlington then we're at looking at 4 spots to fill. Anderson is gonna need to pull a rabbit out of his hat or we're looking at 9th or 10th place again next year. 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 11, 2020, 12:17:11 AM
Even Ole Roy Williams, Coach K and Patrick Ewing are regularly seen scouting HS games. Mullin did it his first year or two before he became a permanent west coaster again. Also absent all off season when NCAA allows for individual instruction for players which is why T. Owens left.

Assistants scout and head coach goes where he’s told when needed to close based on that.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 11, 2020, 12:19:53 AM
Holy sh*t you are stupid. The most talented team? We didn’t have a single big man that could score in the paint. Not a PF and not a center. We didn’t have a single capable secondary ball-handler. We didn’t have a single big man that could defend and rebound.

Simon was so bad offensively that some teams literally chose not to defend him!

Oh, and we had no depth.

If you want to blame the staff for poor recruiting and poor roster construction...that is fine. To suggest we had a top roster is ‘tarded and not based in reality.

Outside of Nova you could argue we had most talent.

Also the whole notion of 7th place is so misleading to me. The difference between 3rd and 7th was 1 game.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: mullin85berry86 on February 11, 2020, 12:23:29 AM
Andre curbello, the guy who you said was coming. Was quoted in a rivals or 24-7 article saying he never once spoke to Chris mullin.
If you are saying that it’s not important to get out and recruit. You are only lying to yourself. Besides being a terrible coach. He couldn’t even be the hero.
Patrick hired a real staff. Patrick recruits. Patrick has relationships with aau and Hs coaches. Patrick actually coaches. Patrick still has a job.

Curbelo never spoke to Curbelo? Wow what a shocker, just like Femi coming to visit SJU campus and SJU's greatness was in cali getting a nice sun tan on the beach?
What a load of s*.   Thank god Chris stepped down.
Femi sure kicked our ass last year.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: mullin85berry86 on February 11, 2020, 12:25:07 AM
Things are not looking good. Hearing there is likely going to be mass exodus of players at end of year.

Why would Greg leave, he's getting a ton of minutes.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: mullin85berry86 on February 11, 2020, 12:27:35 AM
Hope Williams and Roberts stay but I’d bet they both go.

Roberts is in the dog house I think.
Didn't play alot vs. Georgetown, and only 7 minutes at CU.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 12:41:13 AM
It may very well take Anderson until year three to make the NCAA tournament. That’s what happens when you inherit a program that is in need of rebuilding.
It may very well take Mullin until year four to make the Ncaa tournament. That's what happens when you inherit a program that is the worst team in the history of the school.

So why didn't our legend deserve the same patience and understanding from the traitors?

 

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 12:47:57 AM
Because last year's team had the most talented roster in the Big East
Last year's team had no size; no depth; Bryan Trimble as it's 6th man with no 7th man; and a power forward who played on the perimeter and committed two fouls in the pregame layup line.
Quote

and still finished in 7th place and below .500 in conference. 
Yes, that is part of the story but only a small insignificant part and your purposely omitting the big picture. Nobody cares about the regular season. It doesn't matter. You either qualify for the Ncaa tournament or you don't. Mullin did.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 12:54:00 AM
Bottom line is they're all just more reasons why he wasn't getting the job done.
The Ncaa tournament bid is a reason that he did get the job done.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 01:07:22 AM
Patrick hired a real staff. Patrick recruits. Patrick has relationships with aau and Hs coaches. Patrick actually coaches. Patrick still has a job.
Patrick didn't make the tournament in either of his first two seasons and won't make it again this season. If he doesn't make it again next season, and he won't, that'll be one coach not as good as coach Mullin. I hope CFC won't be another one.

Who cares about your nonsensical perception of things?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 11, 2020, 01:08:31 AM
Curbelo never spoke to Curbelo? Wow what a shocker, just like Femi coming to visit SJU campus and SJU's greatness was in cali getting a nice sun tan on the beach?
What a load of s*.   Thank god Chris stepped down.
Femi sure kicked our ass last year.




Curbelo was going to be a Johnny. He was at plenty of our games.

Femi wanted a guaranteed startng spot.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 01:11:25 AM
Not exactly shocking news. 
It wouldn't be shocking news to you that "transfer U" is not over?  I'm sorry, but you are really full of sh*t.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 11, 2020, 01:14:49 AM
When Anderson fails here will the administration have the balls to fire Cragg?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 11, 2020, 01:44:06 AM
It may very well take Mullin until year four to make the Ncaa tournament. That's what happens when you inherit a program that is the worst team in the history of the school.

So why didn't our legend deserve the same patience and understanding from the traitors?

He inherited a team that was a relevant program. Who had post season play in 4 out of 5 years. Back to back 20 win seasons. Back to back over .500 conference record. A team coming off a NCAA birth. He inherited a team who had CO, and Jordan. Who had Samir and Sampson committed. Who was building a European pipeline. Had Ponds gift wrapped.

The team Mullin ended up having was the team HE built. He didn’t want CO, Jordan, Samir or Sampson. I gave him year one and two and did not criticize him even though we looked terrible. Was looking forward to year 3 and we started BE play 0-11 with 2 maybe 3 NBA players in the starting line up and Clark coming off the bench.

He didn’t care about defense and rebounding. He didn’t care about recruiting. He didn’t care about building personal connections with his players. He didn’t care that Mitch was dead weight. He didn’t care he wasn’t the one running practices.

Yes last year we made it to the play-in game and lost. It was the first time in four years we had post season play. It was the first time in four years we had a overall winning record. We still hadn’t achieved a winning BE record in four years. We had one player signed for this year who would have left when Matt left.

Unless we brought in Pitino we were going to be terrible this year with Anderson, Mullin or whoever else they were considering for the job. That’s why he deserved to be let go, we were going to be terrible this year, mainly because it was clear he didn’t know how to tuna program.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 11, 2020, 01:56:19 AM
Last year's team had no size; no depth; Bryan Trimble as it's 6th man with no 7th man; and a power forward who played on the perimeter and committed two fouls

This is unbelievable. All of this is true for this years team minus an NBA player and the DPOY. Why don’t you make the same excuse for Anderson?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 11, 2020, 01:59:49 AM
Things are not looking good. Hearing there is likely going to be mass exodus of players at end of year.

Things weren’t looking good before the season started. The staff has never stopped recruiting for 2020 even though we don’t have any ships available. We knew along time ago there would be roster movement. This is necessary, too much dead weight.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 11, 2020, 06:40:50 AM
It may very well take Mullin until year four to make the Ncaa tournament. That's what happens when you inherit a program that is the worst team in the history of the school.

So why didn't our legend deserve the same patience and understanding from the traitors?

 


Because he didn’t try.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 06:55:11 AM
He inherited a team that was a relevant program. Who had post season play in 4 out of 5 years. Back to back 20 win seasons. Back to back over .500 conference record. A team coming off a NCAA birth. He inherited a team who had CO, and Jordan. Who had Samir and Sampson committed. Who was building a European pipeline. Had Ponds gift wrapped.

The team Mullin ended up having was the team HE built. He didn’t want CO, Jordan, Samir or Sampson. I gave him year one and two and did not criticize him even though we looked terrible. Was looking forward to year 3 and we started BE play 0-11 with 2 maybe 3 NBA players in the starting line up and Clark coming off the bench.

He didn’t care about defense and rebounding. He didn’t care about recruiting. He didn’t care about building personal connections with his players. He didn’t care that Mitch was dead weight. He didn’t care he wasn’t the one running practices.

Yes last year we made it to the play-in game and lost. It was the first time in four years we had post season play. It was the first time in four years we had a overall winning record. We still hadn’t achieved a winning BE record in four years. We had one player signed for this year who would have left when Matt left.

Unless we brought in Pitino we were going to be terrible this year with Anderson, Mullin or whoever else they were considering for the job. That’s why he deserved to be let go, we were going to be terrible this year, mainly because it was clear he didn’t know how to tuna program.
Team 1: Jones, Balamou, Alibagovic

Team 2: LJ, Heron, Earlington, Williams, Roberts, Caraher, Steere

Which team would you rather coach?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 06:56:15 AM
Because he didn’t try.
You mean he was such a great coach that he makes it to the tournament without even trying? That is remarkable.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 06:59:25 AM
Why don’t you make the same excuse for Anderson?
Because I've never posted even one negative thing about him in my life. I don't need to make excuses for him because I've never put him down or complained about his coaching.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 11, 2020, 07:24:41 AM
Patrick didn't make the tournament in either of his first two seasons and won't make it again this season. If he doesn't make it again next season, and he won't, that'll be one coach not as good as coach Mullin. I hope CFC won't be another one.


I starting to believe that you really believe the non sense that you post.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 11, 2020, 09:25:47 AM
building a European pipeline.

You're deranged.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 11, 2020, 09:45:22 AM
I've been getting the feeling lately that Anderson doesn't have much of an interest in moving forward with the guys he didn't bring in here. I hope Roberts and Earlington stay as they clearly have much higher upside than Anderson guy Sears but Roberts lack of PT lately is puzzling and a bad sign.

If we're entering the offseason with just Anderson's guys plus Earlington then we're at looking at 4 spots to fill. Anderson is gonna need to pull a rabbit out of his hat or we're looking at 9th or 10th place again next year. 

It certainly looks like he's coaching for, well not next year, we're going to stink be rebuilding again next year, but maybe the year after. It also looks like he's trying to give various players reasons to leave, which is a little unseemly. These are after all student athletes who committed to the university on the theory that it would mold them into admirable young men with skills for life. You'd think it didn't matter who recruited them, but it seems to. If so, very classy.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 11, 2020, 10:48:05 AM
You mean he was such a great coach that he makes it to the tournament without even trying? That is remarkable.
20-59 with 40 plus knockouts will be remembered. Losing a game on true tv the day before the tournament isn’t that important. Just another beat down
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 11, 2020, 10:48:38 AM
It certainly looks like he's coaching for, well not next year, we're going to stink be rebuilding again next year, but maybe the year after. It also looks like he's trying to give various players reasons to leave, which is a little unseemly. These are after all student athletes who committed to the university on the theory that it would mold them into admirable young men with skills for life. You'd think it didn't matter who recruited them, but it seems to. If so, very classy.

This can’t be serious?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 11, 2020, 11:15:40 AM

Curbelo was going to be a Johnny. He was at plenty of our games.

Femi wanted a guaranteed startng spot.

Mullin refused to play ball with several demands from recruits and players. That is one of the reasons successful guys, especially those with morals, have a hard time cutting it against some of these sleaze ball coaches that dot the college basketball landscape.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 11, 2020, 11:31:13 AM
Simon was DPOY in the BE so obviously he had talent. You could suck on offense and still be talented, el dopeo! Surely the roster was more talented than a 7th place, below .500 conference finish in a weak Big East. But don't let facts get in the way.

You are fixated on 7th place in the Big East because you are too simple to weigh the season as a whole and then compare to the rest of the conference.

Luckily there was a committee who did that for you. They deemed St. John’s worthy of entry into the field of 68. They only deemed FOUR teams from the conference worthy, and we were one. That should end the conversation for anyone with a triple-digit IQ.

Reaching the tournament is quite an achievement at St. John’s this century.

Anderson would have won 3-4 games with last year’s roster.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 11, 2020, 11:37:16 AM
You are fixated on 7th place in the Big East because you are too simple to weigh the season as a whole and then compare to the rest of the conference.

Luckily there was a committee who did that for you. They deemed St. John’s worthy of entry into the field of 68. They only deemed FOUR teams from the conference worthy, and we were one. That should end the conversation for anyone with a triple-digit IQ.

Reaching the tournament is quite an achievement at St. John’s this century.

Anderson would have won 3-4 games with last year’s roster.

Don't forget to mention that SJU was the last team from the Big East, and team #68 selected into the tourney, in a weak conference year that didn't even have one team survive the first weekend of the dance. But keep stretching to support your woefully weak argument.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 11, 2020, 11:47:26 AM
Williams seems well suited for this system and he is positioned to take on a bigger role when Heron and LJ depart.

Roberts would be wise to to stay put. I think his limited play has a lot to do with our inability to open up most of our conference games. He’s just not very effective in the half court.

I don’t really understand what Anderson is looking for in a recruit yet. I actually liked his Arkansas team when I saw them play SH in the tournament a few years ago and even posted about here live. That team had a ton of jacked players. Look at that roster...some of those kids could have played football. Strength obviously plays a factor in his system.

Now he’s recruiting beanpoles like Cole and Moore with trucks like Wusu and Posh (Champagnie and Sears as well).
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 11, 2020, 11:50:13 AM
Don't forget to mention that SJU was the last team from the Big East, and team #68 selected into the tourney, in a weak conference year that didn't even have one team survive the first weekend of the dance. But keep stretching to support your woefully weak argument.

I’ll take that, babe. That makes it a top five season for us this century, and we are already into our third decade. Time to face reality and take a good long look in the mirror. This is St. John’s now.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 11, 2020, 11:58:20 AM
Mullin refused to play ball with several demands from recruits and players. That is one of the reasons successful guys, especially those with morals, have a hard time cutting it against some of these sleaze ball coaches that dot the college basketball landscape.
Successful guys? He didn’t even contact one of the best players in the area in curbello. And he didn’t even show up to on campus meeting with femi.
The guy was a bum
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 01:36:59 PM
I starting to believe that you really believe the non sense that you post.
I'll just throw it out there to the board because we've already established that you're incapable of understanding the very simple points I make.

After this year Ewing will be 0 for 3 in tournament bids. Next year he'll be 0 for 4. Mullin went 1 for 4. Therefore, it's easily deduced that he's a better coach than Ewing.

Similarly, Mullins 1 for 4 is better than Norm's 0 for 6. Yet, you believe Norm >> Mullin with your twisted no logic.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 11, 2020, 01:46:57 PM
I'll just throw it out there to the board because we've already established that you're incapable of understanding the very simple points I make.

After this year Ewing will be 0 for 3 in tournament bids. Next year he'll be 0 for 4. Mullin went 1 for 4. Therefore, it's easily deduced that he's a better coach than Ewing.

Similarly, Mullins 1 for 4 is better than Norm's 0 for 6. Yet, you believe Norm >> Mullin with your twisted no logic.

Don’t respond to that nitwit. He just questioned whether Mullin was successful when he was hired.

A gym teacher who posts on a sports fan site during class just questioned whether a two-time NBA Hall of Fame inductee was successful😂
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 02:03:44 PM
40 plus knockouts will be remembered.
You do realize that the sport you've been watching all these years is not boxing but basketball, don't you. Losing by 1 is the same as losing by 40 if you're not betting on the games. Actually, even if you think you've been watching boxing - losing on points or by TKO is the same as on a knockout if your not betting on the games.
Quote
Losing a game on true tv the day before the tournament isn’t that important.
That's not true(tv). It wasn't important only to you, and the other traitors, because your twisted hatred of our hero made it so. To fans of perennial losing basketball programs everywhere, like St. John's, it's very important. A virtual measuring stick of a successful season.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 11, 2020, 02:49:13 PM
You do realize that the sport you've been watching all these years is not boxing but basketball, don't you. Losing by 1 is the same as losing by 40 if you're not betting on the games. Actually, even if you think you've been watching boxing - losing on points or by TKO is the same as on a knockout if your not betting on the games. That's not true(tv). It wasn't important only to you, and the other traitors, because your twisted hatred of our hero made it so. To fans of perennial losing basketball programs everywhere, like St. John's, it's very important. A virtual measuring stick of a successful season.
Anderson is losing games. He is not embarrassing himself or the school. You can’t say that about your boy. Even though you have tried over and over again.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 11, 2020, 02:56:32 PM
Don’t respond to that nitwit. He just questioned whether Mullin was successful when he was hired.

A gym teacher who posts on a sports fan site during class just questioned whether a two-time NBA Hall of Fame inductee was successful😂
You are getting old. You have told us many times that you are not a pussy. But you are not built like Mustapha heron any more. (You probably never were).
I am sorry you lost an argument over a month ago. Your retaliation has been amusing. How many times have you attacked our coach? How many people have you called names? Why? Just because your feelings got hurt? I am sorry Marillac, can’t we have some common ground? Mullin was really ok. Almost good. At worst 2 games worse then Anderson.
I have a bet for you. I will bet you anything. By this time next year I bet your an Anderson fan. You are that full of crap. It will be amusing to watch you backtrack again.
20-59 will never be forgotten
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 11, 2020, 03:16:46 PM
You do realize that the sport you've been watching all these years is not boxing but basketball, don't you. Losing by 1 is the same as losing by 40 if you're not betting on the games. Actually, even if you think you've been watching boxing - losing on points or by TKO is the same as on a knockout if your not betting on the games. That's not true(tv). It wasn't important only to you, and the other traitors, because your twisted hatred of our hero made it so. To fans of perennial losing basketball programs everywhere, like St. John's, it's very important. A virtual measuring stick of a successful season.
So you would rather attend a game and watch your team play like shit and lose by 40 than to watch them play competitively and lose by one. OK
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 11, 2020, 03:42:37 PM
This can’t be serious?

Hot Dog Day Afternoon

Act II Scene 2

<A middle aged balding man dressed Chinese knock off velour track suit and a white polo shirt tucked in so it hugs his love handles sits in front of the remains of his meal: a Dave’s Hot n Juicy 3/4 pound Triple with Cheese, Bacon & Cheese Baked Potato and a large chocolate Frosty. Around his neck is a whistle on a string. The man dabs at a ketchup stain on his shirt with a paper napkin, shrugs, wipes his mouth with his sleeve, retrieves his phone from his sweat pants pocket and dials.>



Hi Ma.

Tony? Is it Tony? Hi hon. Where are you? It's loud.

Wendy's ma. Just had lunch.

Wendy's? What about your diet?

It's okay ma, Tuesday's my cheat day. Plus I just had a salad anyway.

I'm so proud of you hon ... Tony, if you're calling about your laundry I haven't done it yet. I worked a double at the King Kullen today and my dogs are barking. I'll do it in the morning.

That's okay ma, take your time. No worries. Hey ma, remember my friend foady?

Yes hon of course I remember your friend foady, you mention him every time you call ... Tony I have to ask you a question and you have to tell mommy the truth no matter what. Promise?

Sure ma, what is it?

Tony, this foady, is he your boyfriend?

What? Ma. No.

Because it's okay if he is.

Ma I -

No Tony, you let mommy finish. You talk about this foady all the time and you always mention his privates and his bottom. You haven't had a girlfriend in I don't know how long. You spend every day with half naked sweaty teenage boys and I know what teenage boys are like, I had two. Between you and your brother there wasn't a clean sock in the house. And then there was when you was an altar boy with that awful Father Bruttiboni, the one who went to jail like that gym teacher Mister Sandusky. If you're funny Tony, you tell mommy now.

Come on ma. Look. In the first place it's physical education teacher, not gym teacher, okay? In the second place nothing happened that time with Father Bruttiboni in the rectory basement, I told the police that, he just fell on top of me during vespers and we got all tangled up and then Sister Struffoli walked in and found us. I don't have a girlfriend because I don't have time. Like the other night I had to watch parts of twelve college basketball games to learn enough so that someday I can get a coveted jay vee coaching position. So I don't have time for girls. And I don't want to watch teen age boys shower and make sure they soap up their tight glistening torsos and clean their taints ma, I have to. It's my job. I mean ma, I love being a physical education teacher. I love it all. Dodge ball. Floor hockey. Greco Roman wrestling. The feeling I get when I put Butch in my mouth and blow -

Tony! My god!

Ma, Butch is what I call my favorite whistle, after my childhood idol Butch Carter. Ma, when I put Butch in my mouth and blow and everyone stops what they're doing and looks at me, it's like magical! It's the best feeling ever. Not to mention I get summer's off so I can go to the beach. That's why I'm dieting, so that next summer I can take my shirt off when I go to Fire Island.

Okay Tony okay. Enough already. Maybe stop protesting so much. I just wanted you to know that your father and I discussed it and if you ever have anything you want to get off your chest you can come to us whatever it is and we'll still love you. So tell mommy what's up with your friend foady anyway.

Oh nothing ma, sometimes he just acts so superior because he knows how to spell words used in nursery rhymes and what parts of speeches are called and how to use questioning marks and ejaculation points. Just because I dont have enough words to make peoples understands me the way they understands his doesn't mean I don't know things he doesn't know I knows. But he treats me a like a mamaluke. And I'm not! I'm smart! Not like everybody says, like dumb. I'm smart and I want respect!

Now Tony stop, don't get overheated. You have a temper like your father. Maybe you should forget this foady and find someone else to play with.

Maybe I will ma. Say how's pop anyway.

Madonna mia! your father's gonna be the death of me. The other day I made a beautiful chicken picatta before my shift at the King Kullen and I told your father I said Petey, put it in the oven on bake 45 minutes before dinner and he said yeah yeah yeah. Well he must have been distracted watching that tramp Bret Somer on Ten Thousand Dollar Pyramid because he put the chicken in the oven all right but he forgot to turn the oven on and he ended up eating the chicken raw! Two helpings! Now he has the squirts something awful. Back and forth to the toilet for three days now. You should say hi, I'll call him.

I can't now ma, I have to get back to school. I'll talk to him Saturday when I pick up my laundry. Do you think it'll be done by then? I only have a couple pair of clean underwears left.

I don't know if you'll have too many more clean pair when I'm done, for the life of me I can't get these stains out. You need to do a better job when you wipe hon.

I'm careful ma, I am, it's just that sometimes when I'm on the train it's swaying and there's all those stops and starts and I get jostled around. It's hard to do a good job.

Okay hon okay don't get exercised. I'll presoak them in bleach and Oxy 10, that's how I do your fathers.

Okay ma, I gotta run, love you. Say hi to poop for me. Did I say poop? I meant pop obviously.

Okay Tony, love you, bye.

Bye.

<and scene>
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: mullin85berry86 on February 11, 2020, 04:39:56 PM
Hot Dog Day Afternoon

Act II Scene 2

<A middle aged balding man dressed Chinese knock off velour track suit and a white polo shirt tucked in so it hugs his love handles sits in front of the remains of his meal: a Dave’s Hot n Juicy 3/4 pound Triple with Cheese, Bacon & Cheese Baked Potato and a large chocolate Frosty. Around his neck is a whistle on a string. The man dabs at a ketchup stain on his shirt with a paper napkin, shrugs, wipes his mouth with his sleeve, retrieves his phone from his sweat pants pocket and dials.>



Hi Ma.

Tony? Is it Tony? Hi hon. Where are you? It's loud.

Wendy's ma. Just had lunch.

Wendy's? What about your diet?

It's okay ma, Tuesday's my cheat day. Plus I just had a salad anyway.

I'm so proud of you hon ... Tony, if you're calling about your laundry I haven't done it yet. I worked a double at the King Kullen today and my dogs are barking. I'll do it in the morning.

That's okay ma, take your time. No worries. Hey ma, remember my friend foady?

Yes hon of course I remember your friend foady, you mention him every time you call ... Tony I have to ask you a question and you have to tell mommy the truth no matter what. Promise?

Sure ma, what is it?

Tony, this foady, is he your boyfriend?

What? Ma. No.

Because it's okay if he is.

Ma I -

No Tony, you let mommy finish. You talk about this foady all the time and you always mention his privates and his bottom. You haven't had a girlfriend in I don't know how long. You spend every day with half naked sweaty teenage boys and I know what teenage boys are like, I had two. Between you and your brother there wasn't a clean sock in the house. And then there was when you was an altar boy with that awful Father Bruttiboni, the one who went to jail like that gym teacher Mister Sandusky. If you're funny Tony, you tell mommy now.

Come on ma. Look. In the first place it's physical education teacher, not gym teacher, okay? In the second place nothing happened that time with Father Bruttiboni in the rectory basement, I told the police that, he just fell on top of me during vespers and we got all tangled up and then Sister Struffoli walked in and found us. I don't have a girlfriend because I don't have time. Like the other night I had to watch parts of twelve college basketball games to learn enough so that someday I can get a coveted jay vee coaching position. So I don't have time for girls. And I don't want to watch teen age boys shower and make sure they soap up their tight glistening torsos and clean their taints ma, I have to. It's my job. I mean ma, I love being a physical education teacher. I love it all. Dodge ball. Floor hockey. Greco Roman wrestling. The feeling I get when I put Butch in my mouth and blow -

Tony! My god!

Ma, Butch is what I call my favorite whistle, after my childhood idol Butch Carter. Ma, when I put Butch in my mouth and blow and everyone stops what they're doing and looks at me, it's like magical! It's the best feeling ever. Not to mention I get summer's off so I can go to the beach. That's why I'm dieting, so that next summer I can take my shirt off when I go to Fire Island.

Okay Tony okay. Enough already. Maybe stop protesting so much. I just wanted you to know that your father and I discussed it and if you ever have anything you want to get off your chest you can come to us whatever it is and we'll still love you. So tell mommy what's up with your friend foady anyway.

Oh nothing ma, sometimes he just acts so superior because he knows how to spell words used in nursery rhymes and what parts of speeches are called and how to use questioning marks and ejaculation points. Just because I dont have enough words to make peoples understands me the way they understands his doesn't mean I don't know things he doesn't know I knows. But he treats me a like a mamaluke. And I'm not! I'm smart! Not like everybody says, like dumb. I'm smart and I want respect!

Now Tony stop, don't get overheated. You have a temper like your father. Maybe you should forget this foady and find someone else to play with.

Maybe I will ma. Say how's pop anyway.

Madonna mia! your father's gonna be the death of me. The other day I made a beautiful chicken picatta before my shift at the King Kullen and I told your father I said Petey, put it in the oven on bake 45 minutes before dinner and he said yeah yeah yeah. Well he must have been distracted watching that tramp Bret Somer on Ten Thousand Dollar Pyramid because he put the chicken in the oven all right but he forgot to turn the oven on and he ended up eating the chicken raw! Two helpings! Now he has the squirts something awful. Back and forth to the toilet for three days now. You should say hi, I'll call him.

I can't now ma, I have to get back to school. I'll talk to him Saturday when I pick up my laundry. Do you think it'll be done by then? I only have a couple pair of clean underwears left.

I don't know if you'll have too many more clean pair when I'm done, for the life of me I can't get these stains out. You need to do a better job when you wipe hon.

I'm careful ma, I am, it's just that sometimes when I'm on the train it's swaying and there's all those stops and starts and I get jostled around. It's hard to do a good job.

Okay hon okay don't get exercised. I'll presoak them in bleach and Oxy 10, that's how I do your fathers.

Okay ma, I gotta run, love you. Say hi to poop for me. Did I say poop? I meant pop obviously.

Okay Tony, love you, bye.

Bye.

<and scene>

Lol what a bunch of characters on this site
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 11, 2020, 07:32:46 PM
Hot Dog Day Afternoon

Act II Scene 2

<A middle aged balding man dressed Chinese knock off velour track suit and a white polo shirt tucked in so it hugs his love handles sits in front of the remains of his meal: a Dave’s Hot n Juicy 3/4 pound Triple with Cheese, Bacon & Cheese Baked Potato and a large chocolate Frosty. Around his neck is a whistle on a string. The man dabs at a ketchup stain on his shirt with a paper napkin, shrugs, wipes his mouth with his sleeve, retrieves his phone from his sweat pants pocket and dials.>



Hi Ma.

Tony? Is it Tony? Hi hon. Where are you? It's loud.

Wendy's ma. Just had lunch.

Wendy's? What about your diet?

It's okay ma, Tuesday's my cheat day. Plus I just had a salad anyway.

I'm so proud of you hon ... Tony, if you're calling about your laundry I haven't done it yet. I worked a double at the King Kullen today and my dogs are barking. I'll do it in the morning.

That's okay ma, take your time. No worries. Hey ma, remember my friend foady?

Yes hon of course I remember your friend foady, you mention him every time you call ... Tony I have to ask you a question and you have to tell mommy the truth no matter what. Promise?

Sure ma, what is it?

Tony, this foady, is he your boyfriend?

What? Ma. No.

Because it's okay if he is.

Ma I -

No Tony, you let mommy finish. You talk about this foady all the time and you always mention his privates and his bottom. You haven't had a girlfriend in I don't know how long. You spend every day with half naked sweaty teenage boys and I know what teenage boys are like, I had two. Between you and your brother there wasn't a clean sock in the house. And then there was when you was an altar boy with that awful Father Bruttiboni, the one who went to jail like that gym teacher Mister Sandusky. If you're funny Tony, you tell mommy now.

Come on ma. Look. In the first place it's physical education teacher, not gym teacher, okay? In the second place nothing happened that time with Father Bruttiboni in the rectory basement, I told the police that, he just fell on top of me during vespers and we got all tangled up and then Sister Struffoli walked in and found us. I don't have a girlfriend because I don't have time. Like the other night I had to watch parts of twelve college basketball games to learn enough so that someday I can get a coveted jay vee coaching position. So I don't have time for girls. And I don't want to watch teen age boys shower and make sure they soap up their tight glistening torsos and clean their taints ma, I have to. It's my job. I mean ma, I love being a physical education teacher. I love it all. Dodge ball. Floor hockey. Greco Roman wrestling. The feeling I get when I put Butch in my mouth and blow -

Tony! My god!

Ma, Butch is what I call my favorite whistle, after my childhood idol Butch Carter. Ma, when I put Butch in my mouth and blow and everyone stops what they're doing and looks at me, it's like magical! It's the best feeling ever. Not to mention I get summer's off so I can go to the beach. That's why I'm dieting, so that next summer I can take my shirt off when I go to Fire Island.

Okay Tony okay. Enough already. Maybe stop protesting so much. I just wanted you to know that your father and I discussed it and if you ever have anything you want to get off your chest you can come to us whatever it is and we'll still love you. So tell mommy what's up with your friend foady anyway.

Oh nothing ma, sometimes he just acts so superior because he knows how to spell words used in nursery rhymes and what parts of speeches are called and how to use questioning marks and ejaculation points. Just because I dont have enough words to make peoples understands me the way they understands his doesn't mean I don't know things he doesn't know I knows. But he treats me a like a mamaluke. And I'm not! I'm smart! Not like everybody says, like dumb. I'm smart and I want respect!

Now Tony stop, don't get overheated. You have a temper like your father. Maybe you should forget this foady and find someone else to play with.

Maybe I will ma. Say how's pop anyway.

Madonna mia! your father's gonna be the death of me. The other day I made a beautiful chicken picatta before my shift at the King Kullen and I told your father I said Petey, put it in the oven on bake 45 minutes before dinner and he said yeah yeah yeah. Well he must have been distracted watching that tramp Bret Somer on Ten Thousand Dollar Pyramid because he put the chicken in the oven all right but he forgot to turn the oven on and he ended up eating the chicken raw! Two helpings! Now he has the squirts something awful. Back and forth to the toilet for three days now. You should say hi, I'll call him.

I can't now ma, I have to get back to school. I'll talk to him Saturday when I pick up my laundry. Do you think it'll be done by then? I only have a couple pair of clean underwears left.

I don't know if you'll have too many more clean pair when I'm done, for the life of me I can't get these stains out. You need to do a better job when you wipe hon.

I'm careful ma, I am, it's just that sometimes when I'm on the train it's swaying and there's all those stops and starts and I get jostled around. It's hard to do a good job.

Okay hon okay don't get exercised. I'll presoak them in bleach and Oxy 10, that's how I do your fathers.

Okay ma, I gotta run, love you. Say hi to poop for me. Did I say poop? I meant pop obviously.

Okay Tony, love you, bye.

Bye.

<and scene>

Spot on.

The pressure of hiding his true sexuality from his family must be unbearable if he needs to come here and drop so many breadcrumbs for posters to follow.

The over/under on trannies he’s been with is 40. I’ll take the over on that bet, but I have a feeling he prefers the under in those rendezvous. #powerbottom
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 11, 2020, 07:33:49 PM
#40KOs
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 11, 2020, 08:15:11 PM
#40KOs
Read your last two posts and I'm the one with the poor sense of humor? Also Musslehead whom you deify as a coach is 4-6 in the league (Arkansas/SEC) and is down right now at 13-10 Tennessee by 17 in the second half.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Poison on February 11, 2020, 08:32:18 PM
Don’t respond to that nitwit. He just questioned whether Mullin was successful when he was hired.

A gym teacher who posts on a sports fan site during class just questioned whether a two-time NBA Hall of Fame inductee was successful😂

Look who think he’s a coastal elite.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 09:16:49 PM
So you would rather attend a game and watch your team play like shit and lose by 40 than to watch them play competitively and lose by one. OK
No. Don't put words in my mouth.

If I'm attending a game live I'm obviously there to be entertained. I know that close games are more entertaining then blowouts. But when it comes to pre and post season tournament advancement, losing by 1 is the same as losing by 40. When pundits are punditing about post season tournament berths, they speak of quality wins and quality losses. Not quality losses or wins by 1 or 40. When the tournament committee looks at quad 1, 2 etc. wins and losses, they are not looking at quad wins or losses by 1 or 40.

Make sense?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 11, 2020, 09:49:37 PM
No. Don't put words in my mouth.

If I'm attending a game live I'm obviously there to be entertained. I know that close games are more entertaining then blowouts. But when it comes to pre and post season tournament advancement, losing by 1 is the same as losing by 40. When pundits are punditing about post season tournament berths, they speak of quality wins and quality losses. Not quality losses or wins by 1 or 40. When the tournament committee looks at quad 1, 2 etc. wins and losses, they are not looking at quad wins or losses by 1 or 40.

Make sense?
First of all they do to my knowledge differentiate between wins of less than 10 vs more than 10 but to me I really don't give a load about that stuff. As far as I'm concerned they can take their Quad whatever and shove it. I'm talking about wanting your team to be and play as good and as well as possible at all times be it in a win or a loss so my point was I'd rather be competitive and lose by one than get blown out and lose by 40. When they announce the field for the NCAA I accept it I really don't give a rat's patootie about the metrics used to arrive at THEIR decision since I have no control over it.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 11, 2020, 11:06:54 PM
First of all they do to my knowledge differentiate between wins of less than 10 vs more than 10 
I did not know that. If so, I change my position to there's no difference between wins or losses of 10 or 40.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 12, 2020, 02:12:20 AM
In other news...the great Eric Musselman, having inherited the SEC leading scorer, has opened up conference play to an outstanding 4-7 record.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 12, 2020, 07:11:53 AM
In other news...the great Eric Musselman, having inherited the SEC leading scorer, has opened up conference play to an outstanding 4-7 record.

Wait, but according to Crackerllac, Musselman is an elite coach. Between Mullin and Musselman they sure have a funny definition of elite. At least have a winning conference record just once.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 12, 2020, 08:10:41 AM
Spot on.

The pressure of hiding his true sexuality from his family must be unbearable if he needs to come here and drop so many breadcrumbs for posters to follow.

The over/under on trannies he’s been with is 40. I’ll take the over on that bet, but I have a feeling he prefers the under in those rendezvous. #powerbottom
Got home late last night and this is what I found. Foady is an old guy just trying to participate. Don’t know why he is here. He doesn’t seem to like St. John’s basketball. I read a bit of his story. The whistle part was a funny.
But you loser. You think you made me cry? I was crying laughing at you again. That was your comeback? If I slept with 4000 trannys that wouldn’t change the fact that your boy was a lazy bum.
Ps had to google power bottom. Is their something that you are not telling us?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on February 14, 2020, 05:23:44 PM
https://twitter.com/LuHiBasketball/status/1228352805842378755
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 14, 2020, 05:25:29 PM
https://twitter.com/LuHiBasketball/status/1228352805842378755
I retweeted that!
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 14, 2020, 05:27:36 PM
https://twitter.com/LuHiBasketball/status/1228352805842378755

LuHi Basketball
Been in the gym way more than the last staff, its appreciated!

Wow. Great to see the new staff building these relationships.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnnies93!! on February 14, 2020, 07:20:40 PM
Wait, but according to Crackerllac, Musselman is an elite coach. Between Mullin and Musselman they sure have a funny definition of elite. At least have a winning conference record just once.

Give Marillac a break...At times he speaks without thinking and makes outlandish comments that are not well thought out....with that said, I do think he wants what is best for Johnnies. He just has an awkward approach....
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 14, 2020, 08:32:10 PM
Give Marillac a break...At times he speaks without thinking and makes outlandish comments that are not well thought out....with that said, I do think he wants what is best for Johnnies. He just has an awkward approach....

Agreed. You just can't unteach stupid.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnnies93!! on February 19, 2020, 02:01:24 PM
Wait, but according to Crackerllac, Musselman is an elite coach. Between Mullin and Musselman they sure have a funny definition of elite. At least have a winning conference record just once.

I watched Arkansas last night (4-9 in conference after a soft non conference schedule)..first time in a few weeks and they stink about the same as us with much less fight....they have gotten much worse since the beginning of the season...they do have a great recruiting class coming in, so I’m sure heading in the right direction...but lately they are plain old bad!!!!
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 19, 2020, 03:29:32 PM
Agreed. You just can't unteach stupid.

Don’t let that stop you from trying babe.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnnies93!! on February 19, 2020, 03:33:37 PM
Don’t let that stop you from trying babe.

You make so many great points on this board and you are one of the few that I really enjoy reading...why not take the hit on the chin, get up and just admit that some of your posts (musselman being a savior) were a bit premature...at least will save you some dignity...
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 19, 2020, 03:39:17 PM

But you loser. You think you made me cry?

No, I didn’t expect a grown man to cry over a post on a fan forum.

I was crying laughing

So I did make you cry. Good talk, Aaron Hernandez.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 19, 2020, 03:46:02 PM
You make so many great points on this board and you are one of the few that I really enjoy reading...why not take the hit on the chin, get up and just admit that some of your posts (musselman being a savior) were a bit premature...at least will save you some dignity...

I never said Musselman was a savior. I said he was better than Anderson and was a tremendous hire.

Arkansas was 15-5 before Isaiah Joe, a likely first round pick, got hurt. They’ve lost 5 straight without him. I think that tells you all you need to know about what he means to that team.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnnies93!! on February 19, 2020, 04:04:57 PM
I never said Musselman was a savior. I said he was better than Anderson and was a tremendous hire.

Arkansas was 15-5 before Isaiah Joe, a likely first round pick, got hurt. They’ve lost 5 straight without him. I think that tells you all you need to know about what he means to that team.

Cmon man....he is a stud and def hurt the team in in terms of wins and losses, but on this site we talk facts and the fact is Arkansas is about as bad as St. John’s right now....and you right, you didn’t call him the savior, my bad and my apologies for miss quoting you..
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 19, 2020, 04:21:11 PM
Cmon man....he is a stud and def hurt the team in in terms of wins and losses, but on this site we talk facts and the fact is Arkansas is about as bad as St. John’s right now....and you right, you didn’t call him the savior, my bad and my apologies for miss quoting you..


No, that is not a fact. No objective evidence supports that conclusion. We have no hope this season. They just need to get Joe back and out put some wins together.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on February 19, 2020, 05:12:44 PM
I never said Musselman was a savior. I said he was better than Anderson and was a tremendous hire.


lol would you rather he put exactly what you said?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 19, 2020, 07:23:02 PM
lol would you rather he put exactly what you said?

Savior is a very strong word and a program like Arkansas doesn’t need a savior. Musselman is twice the coach Anderson is but I could see him leaving for greener pastures.

In terms of cars, he’s not a Bentley but maybe a Mercedes. Anderson is a Toyota.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 19, 2020, 09:00:45 PM
Savior is a very strong word and a program like Arkansas doesn’t need a savior. Musselman is twice the coach Anderson is but I could see him leaving for greener pastures.

In terms of cars, he’s not a Bentley but maybe a Mercedes. Anderson is a Toyota.
And Mullin is a broken down tricycle.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 19, 2020, 11:55:09 PM
And Mullin is a broken down tricycle.

Why do you harbor such animosity towards Chris Mullin? Let it go.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 20, 2020, 02:24:25 AM
Why do you harbor such animosity towards Chris Mullin? Let it go.

It’s not Anderson’s fault Mullin was let go. The over the top criticism he has received thus far is causing this especially since there was little to no criticism made towards the previous regime when they deserved it.



Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on February 20, 2020, 04:25:33 AM
I think I speak for most on this board in saying that anytime someone criticizes coach Anderson on this board we don't need 4-5 posters to then bring up Mullin every single time. I thought he was a horrible coach as well but its over now, move on.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 20, 2020, 08:26:16 AM
And Mullin is a broken down tricycle.

And you are closeted middle-aged man that holds a remarkable amount of resentment for such an unremarkable coach.

What internal pain are you projecting onto this man? Are you ashamed that you are sexually attracted to him? Does he remind you of a guy you hooked up with drunk that threatened to out you? Were you bullied by a kid named Chris when you were younger? Did your Ma tell you you’d have to move out of the basement if you didn’t stop getting so angry at games he coached?

He inherited a 1-17 team and made the NCAA tournament three years later. That may not be good, but it is not awful by any reasonable person’s standard.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 20, 2020, 08:44:44 AM
It’s not Anderson’s fault Mullin was let go. The over the top criticism he has received thus far is causing this especially since there was little to no criticism made towards the previous regime when they deserved it.






You realize the criticism comes because idiots like you can’t help yourselves from heaping unreasonable praise on him while sh*tting on Mullin, right?

Not one poster would pushback on the notion that he is as good of a coach as we can get in 2019-2020 or that he is an improvement over Mullin.  Not one goddamn poster. But that’s not enough for you simpletons.

No, you have to make Anderson out to be some bulletproof savior and post things like “night and day from Mullin,” “thank God for Anderson,” and “it’s amazing what a good coach can do [with a poor roster].” 

How could you not see what was going to happen? At our highest point I said we would still finish in last place “unless DePaul shits the bed.”

This isn’t Missouri or Arkansas. Those are borderline blue bloods. He doesn’t have anymore nephews coming to help him. This is a graveyard for coaches. Lavin and Jarvis made Elite Eights and had a combined 7 Sweet Sixteen appearances and they couldn’t survive here.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 20, 2020, 08:59:41 AM
The over the top criticism he has received thus far is causing this especially since there was little to no criticism made towards the previous regime when they deserved it.

Does the over the top praise that coach ninth place receives justify deserved criticism because of the animus that was displayed against the previous regime, an animus that continues a year after he left? I'm guessing it doesn't, because you've judged your own behavior and find it beyond reproach. Whereas anyone who behaves in a way other than you deem fit is at fault.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 20, 2020, 09:21:38 AM

You realize the criticism comes because idiots like you can’t help yourselves from heaping unreasonable praise on him while sh*tting on Mullin, right?

Not one poster would pushback on the notion that he is as good of a coach as we can get in 2019-2020 or that he is an improvement over Mullin.  Not one goddamn poster. But that’s not enough for you simpletons.

No, you have to make Anderson out to be some bulletproof savior and post things like “night and day from Mullin,” “thank God for Anderson,” and “it’s amazing what a good coach can do [with a poor roster].” 

How could you not see what was going to happen? At our highest point I said we would still finish in last place “unless DePaul shits the bed.”

This isn’t Missouri or Arkansas. Those are borderline blue bloods. He doesn’t have anymore nephews coming to help him. This is a graveyard for coaches. Lavin and Jarvis made Elite Eights and had a combined 7 Sweet Sixteen appearances and they couldn’t survive here.

In what #$%^ing world is Missouri a blue blood or close to being one?  :2funny:  Just stop there before you embarrass yourself further.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 20, 2020, 09:57:57 AM
Why do you harbor such animosity towards Chris Mullin? Let it go.
Sorry Dave just messing with nice persons. It’s not me who should let anything go. We finally have a coach. We are on the right track. A complete rebuild is annoying at times. We are all tired of losing. One Wednesday night on true TV isn’t enough for some us.
9 years ago yesterday was the hardy game. That’s where are program can be. You guys should go over to YouTube and take a look.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 20, 2020, 09:59:09 AM
In what #$%^ing world is Missouri a blue blood or close to being one?  :2funny:  Just stop there before you embarrass yourself further.
I hope he cries again!
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: survivedc on February 20, 2020, 11:21:23 AM
Bielin is looking for a job
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 20, 2020, 12:45:57 PM
Sorry Dave just messing with nice persons. It’s not me who should let anything go. We finally have a coach. We are on the right track. A complete rebuild is annoying at times. We are all tired of losing. One Wednesday night on true TV isn’t enough for some us.
9 years ago yesterday was the hardy game. That’s where are program can be. You guys should go over to YouTube and take a look.

This isn't a complete rebuild at all. Keep telling yourself that though to justify things.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 20, 2020, 02:39:22 PM
In what #$%^ing world is Missouri a blue blood or close to being one?  :2funny:  Just stop there before you embarrass yourself further.

Missouri has made 3 Elite Eights since 1994 and two of those since 2002.  They’ve made ten tournaments since 2000 and that is with 3 years with their own version of Norm Roberts, Kim English. They were ranked the #29 college basketball program of all-time.

Arkansas in one of less than 20 schools to win a national championship since 1990. They made three Final Fours in the 90s.


They are both big time football schools with unlimited budgets.

We have made 4 NCAA tournaments this century. We are a perennial bottom-dweller in a non-football conference in the middle of a clear two-decade demise. We were a blue blood at one point decades ago. Our future is bleak without football.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 20, 2020, 02:44:09 PM
This isn't a complete rebuild at all. Keep telling yourself that though to justify things.
What happened 5 years ago was a SELF imposed death sentence. For the 5000th time that never should have happened.
Honestly not sure what else to say to you. It’s obvious that this team has little to no talent.  Besides LJ do any of our players start for another big east team?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 20, 2020, 02:46:13 PM
This isn't a complete rebuild at all. Keep telling yourself that though to justify things.

That is clear to all but the four horsemen of stupidity. Tony D doesn’t know the difference between site and cite. Johnny23 and SJUFan can’t know how to use contractions. The fourth has privately acknowledged his mental disability and asked that I go easy on him.

The common denominator among the most ardent Anderson supporters is a clear lack of intelligence. It would be quite sad if they weren’t so easy to dislike.



Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 20, 2020, 02:49:33 PM
What happened 5 years ago was a SELF imposed death sentence. For the 5000th time that never should have happened.
Honestly not sure what else to say to you. It’s obvious that this team has little to no talent.  Besides LJ do any of our players start for another big east team?

Heron was a 5* top 25 recruit that led both a mediocre team and a 26-win team in scoring on his way to  being named second team all-conference twice. He’s the most accomplished returning player we’ve had in decades. The coaches in the league thought enough of him to collectively vote him one of the best 12 players in the conference.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 20, 2020, 02:50:43 PM



Not one poster would pushback on the notion that he is as good of a coach as we can get in 2019-2020 or that he is an improvement over Mullin.  Not one goddamn poster. But that’s not enough for you simpletons.


Um, see Carmine.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: wpc77 on February 20, 2020, 03:34:11 PM
Bielin is looking for a job

After his stint with the Cavs, he will be kryptonite for any Afircan American recruits.  He may be able to get a head coaching job at Bob Jones U, though
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on February 20, 2020, 04:49:01 PM
Heron was a 5* top 25 recruit that led both a mediocre team and a 26-win team in scoring on his way to  being named second team all-conference twice. He’s the most accomplished returning player we’ve had in decades. The coaches in the league thought enough of him to collectively vote him one of the best 12 players in the conference.


Dude you do realize shamorie returned after his sophomore year?

For someone who claims to want  middle ground so much you really don’t seem to known where to find it.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 20, 2020, 04:50:19 PM
Heron was a 5* top 25 recruit that led both a mediocre team and a 26-win team in scoring on his way to  being named second team all-conference twice. He’s the most accomplished returning player we’ve had in decades. The coaches in the league thought enough of him to collectively vote him one of the best 12 players in the conference.

And he will never play again for St. John’s, so your point is? By the way he doesn’t look miserable at all. He is very much into the game. Even though he didn’t have a great season. He proved to be a great kid.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 20, 2020, 06:48:38 PM

You realize the criticism comes because idiots like you can’t help yourselves from heaping unreasonable praise on him while sh*tting on Mullin

No, you have to make Anderson out to be some bulletproof savior and post things like “night and day from Mullin,” “thank God for Anderson,” and “it’s amazing what a good coach can do [with a poor roster].” 

How is saying night and day or thank god for Anderson unreasonable praise or means he’s bulletproof?

The problem is you believe Mullin was a average coach with the potential to be good. So saying Anderson is better must mean he’s great and anything short of that is open to ridicule. The truth is Anderson is a good coach, Mullin was terrible. Any objective measurement would support that statement.

So yes Anderson picking up his 2nd victory over a top 25 team in his first season prior to conference play with the worst roster in the BE is what good coaching looks like. Especially when comparing it to Mullin who didn’t pick up his 2nd victory against a top 25 team until his 3rd season.

It doesn’t mean Anderson can walk on water, it just means we are better off regardless of how this season has turned out. Let’s judge Anderson after his 3rd season.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: cjfish on February 20, 2020, 08:24:08 PM
That is clear to all but the four horsemen of stupidity. Tony D doesn’t know the difference between site and cite. Johnny23 and SJUFan can’t know how to use contractions. The fourth has privately acknowledged his mental disability and asked that I go easy on him.

The common denominator among the most ardent Anderson supporters is a clear lack of intelligence. It would be quite sad if they weren’t so easy to dislike.




There are no doubt bright Anderson supporters who think he is an improvement over Mullin.  Great player, poor coach.  But, like me, they refuse to have anything to do with this ridiculous thread.  Tired of it.  Lets all pray for a march miracle and painfully watch the rest of the season.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 20, 2020, 08:44:58 PM
How is saying night and day or thank god for Anderson unreasonable praise or bulletproof?


You and your crew post ten times a day with the same two themes:  Anderson is great and Mullin sucks.
You’ve been walking back your early claims out of necessity after this gross conference performance, but you still won’t admit you were wrong in any way shape or form.  You are like Donald Trump. You have a hundred posts about how great his offense is! He’s damn near ‘tarded in the half court on offense and everyone but the four of you can see it—even his other supporters concede to this.

Like I wrote earlier, the four of you are the reason why every poster that knocks Anderson so vigorously does so. That is why I accused you of hating Anderson. It’s the only thing that makes sense.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 20, 2020, 10:16:38 PM
You and your crew post ten times a day with the same two themes:  Anderson is great and Mullin sucks.
You’ve been walking back your early claims out of necessity after this gross conference performance, but you still won’t admit you were wrong in any way shape or form.  You are like Donald Trump. You have a hundred posts about how great his offense is! He’s damn near ‘tarded in the half court on offense and everyone but the four of you can see it—even his other supporters concede to this.

Like I wrote earlier, the four of you are the reason why every poster that knocks Anderson so vigorously does so. That is why I accused you of hating Anderson. It’s the only thing that makes sense.

You keep saying I’ve been walking back on earlier claims. Your confusing me with others. I made no predictions. I’ve always believed this roster was poor and never once stated where we’ll finish by seasons end. In fact I agreed with you when you stated we may still finish last after the Arizona win, and I posted such. The only thing I said that came remotely close to making a prediction was stating that if both Heron and LJ play well we could surprise this year. But I had my doubts as I’m not as high on LJ and Heron as many of you. They’re good role players but can’t carry a team. Their skill set is too limited.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 20, 2020, 10:32:00 PM
You keep saying I’ve been walking back on earlier claims. Your confusing me with others. I made no predictions. I’ve always believed this roster was poor and never once stated where we’ll finish by seasons end. In fact I agreed with you when you stated we may still finish last after the Arizona win, and I posted such. The only thing I said that came remotely close to making a prediction was stating that if both Heron and LJ play well we could surprise this year. But I had my doubts as I’m not as high on LJ and Heron as many of you. They’re good role players but can’t carry a team. Their skill set is too limited.

You are the most prolific troll on either site...there is no confusing you. Several times I have quoted you and even provided links on occassion. It does nothing to slow down your stupidity.

If you hate Anderson with a passion then well played. Seriously. Your posts have been so insufferable that you’ve forced several posters to attack him. E.g., I think he’ll make the tournament next year and your posts force me to be negative towards him.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 20, 2020, 10:47:11 PM
You are the most prolific troll on either site...there is no confusing you. Several times I have quoted you and even provided links on occassion. It does nothing to slow down your stupidity.

If you hate Anderson with a passion then well played. Seriously. Your posts have been so insufferable that you’ve forced several posters to attack him. E.g., I think he’ll make the tournament next year and your posts force me to be negative towards him.

You have a knack for avoiding the topic, which was I made no claims for this year. Stating you have quoted me and provided links several times isn’t proof of anything. I challenge you to provide that or man up and admit your error. You provided a quote I said for next year, great. It shouldn’t be a issue for you to find the ones you claim I said if it’s true.

As for next year I said if LJ returns I believe we can challenge for a tournament spot. That’s not trolling. That’s stating my expectations. You can disagree if you like, but those would be mine...for next year.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 01:31:20 AM
Um, see Carmine.
You rang.

I'll agree with the " notion that he is as good of a coach as we can get in 2019-2020".

I'm not ready to say that "he is an improvement over Mullin." until he has actually demonstrated that he is an improvement over Mullin. I hope that one day that statement rings true and I'll happily proclaim it. It certainly doesn't at 3 and 11 with the seasons most difficult stretch approaching. Thus far mostly he's demonstrated an ability to blow leads. Oh yeah...I almost forgot...and how to build a culture.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 21, 2020, 01:39:50 AM
You keep saying I’ve been walking back on earlier claims. Your confusing me with others. I made no predictions. I’ve always believed this roster was poor and never once stated where we’ll finish by seasons end. In fact I agreed with you when you stated we may still finish last after the Arizona win, and I posted such. The only thing I said that came remotely close to making a prediction was stating that if both Heron and LJ play well we could surprise this year. But I had my doubts as I’m not as high on LJ and Heron as many of you. They’re good role players but can’t carry a team. Their skill set is too limited.

Thanks for the homework assignment. Your 100 posts a week are in two topics. You could not post for a year and not one person would wonder what your opinion would be on anything.

Heron is as proven and as accomplished of a player as we’ve had in decades. To blame him instead of a coach that can’t utilize his abilities is absurd. What about not blaming anyone and just acknowledging that he isn’t a good fit? Is that so hard? Our second best player is playing poorly too. That is called supporting evidence. Everyone wanted LJ after last season. He could play at any school in the country.

Arkansas fans told us he didn’t know how to use Daniel Gafford, the #38 pick in the 2019 NBA Draft, well last year either. It seems to be a pattern. The converse also seems to be true, though. He can get production from lesser players.

Concede that Anderson struggles in the half court right now or nobody will ever take you seriously.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 01:53:22 AM
Thanks for the homework assignment. Your 100 posts a week are in two topics. You could not post for a year and not one person would wonder what your opinion would be on anything.

Heron is as proven and as accomplished of a player as we’ve had in decades. To blame him instead of a coach that can’t utilize his abilities is absurd. What about not blaming anyone and just acknowledging that he isn’t a good fit? Is that so hard? Our second best player is playing poorly too. That is called supporting evidence. Everyone wanted LJ after last season. He could play at any school in the country.

Arkansas fans told us he didn’t know how to use Daniel Gafford, the #38 pick in the 2019 NBA Draft, well last year either. It seems to be a pattern. The converse also seems to be true, though. He can get production from lesser players.

Concede that Anderson struggles in the half court right now or nobody will ever take you seriously.

Is that your apology?

Let’s think objectively.

Can Anderson offense be better? Of course. But Heron and LJ was on the team last year. Last years team was deeper. Had 2 other NBA players on it. The BE was the weakest it has ever been and we finished 8-10.

As much as Anderson’s offense can improve, the team is bad. The BE coaches thought so much of LJ and Heron they picked us to finish 2nd to last.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 02:17:50 AM
Any objective measurement would support that statement.
Wins are objective and can be measured:

1st season   8-24
2nd season 14-19
3rd season  16-17
4th season  21-13*

*Ncaa tournament bid

Take note of the upward trajectory and the * footnote.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 02:24:56 AM
Last years team was deeper. 
Oh brother. Last years team had Bryan Trimble as a 6th man and no 7th man. Some depth.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on February 21, 2020, 03:49:21 AM
How is saying night and day or thank god for Anderson unreasonable praise or means he’s bulletproof?

The problem is you believe Mullin was a average coach with the potential to be good. So saying Anderson is better must mean he’s great and anything short of that is open to ridicule. The truth is Anderson is a good coach, Mullin was terrible. Any objective measurement would support that statement.

So yes Anderson picking up his 2nd victory over a top 25 team in his first season prior to conference play with the worst roster in the BE is what good coaching looks like. Especially when comparing it to Mullin who didn’t pick up his 2nd victory against a top 25 team until his 3rd season.

It doesn’t mean Anderson can walk on water, it just means we are better off regardless of how this season has turned out. Let’s judge Anderson after his 3rd season.

I love how you say that the win over a top 25 team in Arizona is because of Anderson, but when they blow leads to Seton Hall, Xavier, and others down the stretch of the game its on on the players because they don't have much talent. I just do not get it.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Ez_Uzi on February 21, 2020, 05:12:23 AM
I love how you say that the win over a top 25 team in Arizona is because of Anderson, but when they blow leads to Seton Hall, Xavier, and others down the stretch of the game its on on the players because they don't have much talent. I just do not get it.

In science, it is called a confirmation bias. That is, you start with an idea or fact you want it to be true and only look at the evidence that confirms that idea or fact while ignore any counter-evidence.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 21, 2020, 09:24:11 AM
Wins are objective and can be measured:

1st season   8-24
2nd season 14-19
3rd season  16-17
4th season  21-13*

*Ncaa tournament bid

Take note of the upward trajectory and the * footnote.
Oh brother. Last years team had Bryan Trimble as a 6th man and no 7th man. Some depth.
Take note of 2 last places out of 3. 3 of the worst seasons in school history. Take note of multiple players every year running away from coach mugggggglws. And take note of our amazing special season where our hero against all curses, and where coaches end up in graves took us to the night before the tournament. It was a 7th place magical season that will be remembered forever.  I for one can’t understand why mullin was shit canned after it. Their was clear upward trajectory.
In year 1 for 2 million muggglles couldn’t compete with the likes of Fordham and incarnate word. By year 4 coach mullin had Brian Trimble on TRUE TV.
I admit I was a little nervous at first, our hero didn’t look very confident. A 2 hour game was probably to long for him to pay attention. Once he realized he could play with his water bottle and sit on the scorers table. He seemed much better.
By year 2- someone for optics suggested that he stand for part of the game, like other coaches. If you weren’t really paying attention you couldn’t tell that he was an empty suit.
By year 3 the hero learned his most important lesson.  “Fxck you” every time he got bored he could curse at someone. At this point he was definitely part of the action.
Year 4- for the first time the hero felt comfortable to actually speak to his players. He wanted them to “stay sharpe”.  Clear upward trajectory. Still occasionally the hero might get bored. Rumor was year 5, NIKE Velcro shoes. That could have saved the day.
Mike Anderson isn’t only the best coach we could get at our commuter school. He is a good coach. His job is far from jeopardy. He is going to be here for a long time. I hope you losers keep this up. At times it’s shocking, muggggggles was that bad. Not almost ok. Maybe 2 or more games worse then norm. At times it gives me a laugh. That I appreciate and thank you all for.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 21, 2020, 09:36:27 AM
I love how you say that the win over a top 25 team in Arizona is because of Anderson, but when they blow leads to Seton Hall, Xavier, and others down the stretch of the game its on on the players because they don't have much talent. I just do not get it.
I don’t understand what you don’t get. I was screaming at my TV against Arizona and was thrilled that we got the win. It was obvious that they had better players. 2/3 will be first round picks.
Even at halftime of the seton hall game I wasn’t confident we would win. I cheered like crazy. I wasn’t the slightest bit mad walking out of the garden. Our guys played hard.

Rutherford is probably my favorite player on the team. His effort is amazing, the problem is he stinks.
Champagnie plays 25 plus minutes, does he do that on any other team in the big east?
Earlington has decent production. Does he play for any other big east team?
Caraher is terrible
Is Roberts a big east center?
You guys are crazy. If Trimble like players are here in year 3 and 4, mike Anderson didn’t work out. He should get more time. The boys are playing hard. Not getting knockout or going through motions.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on February 21, 2020, 03:03:31 PM
Oh brother. Last years team had Bryan Trimble as a 6th man and no 7th man. Some depth.
You could make an argument they also had Roberts and Earlington, but they weren’t given enough preseason minutes against patsies to develop.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 03:31:14 PM
You could make an argument they also had Roberts and Earlington, but they weren’t given enough preseason minutes against patsies to develop.
Yes you could.

Or you could make the argument that these freshmen just weren't ready as Duke didn't know the difference between a field goal and a pick and roll at that point and Dr. Roberts weighed less than me and I'm way, way short of 6'. Additionally, you could argue that the patient way they were allowed to develop last season has led to the nothing short of a revelation that Earlington has been this season.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 04:16:02 PM
You could make an argument they also had Roberts and Earlington, but they weren’t given enough preseason minutes against patsies to develop.

Not argue, they did. Roberts, Earlington, Williams, and 4* big Keita.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 04:17:41 PM
Yes you could.

Or you could make the argument that these freshmen just weren't ready as Duke didn't know the difference between a field goal and a pick and roll at that point and Dr. Roberts weighed less than me and I'm way, way short of 6'. Additionally, you could argue that the patient way they were allowed to develop last season has led to the nothing short of a revelation that Earlington has been this season.

Bottom line is we were deeper last year.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 04:24:35 PM
'I for one can’t understand why mullin was shit canned after it. Their was clear upward trajectory.
 
I admit I was a little nervous at first, He seemed much better.
 
Year 4 - Clear upward trajectory.' 
I knew that you were a reasonable man and that I could bring you around using patience, facts and logic.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 04:26:11 PM
Wins are objective and can be measured:

1st season   8-24
2nd season 14-19
3rd season  16-17
4th season  21-13*

*Ncaa tournament bid

Take note of the upward trajectory and the * footnote.

In what universe is a overall record of 59-73 (20-52 BE record) not terrible?

Take note of the 3rd season. 16-17 (4-14) with 3 NBA players in the starting lineup and we couldn’t muster a .500 record or qualify for the NIT. How is that not anything less than terrible? You believe that was a good season because we improved over the previous year?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 04:34:17 PM
I love how you say that the win over a top 25 team in Arizona is because of Anderson, but when they blow leads to Seton Hall, Xavier, and others down the stretch of the game its on on the players because they don't have much talent. I just do not get it.


Wins and loses are both on players. Anderson’s system, defensively, is what put us in position to win these games.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 21, 2020, 04:34:29 PM
Bottom line is we were deeper last year.

You're delusional.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 21, 2020, 04:46:32 PM
In what universe is a overall record of 59-73 (20-52 BE record) not terrible?

Take note of the 3rd season. 16-17 (4-14) with 3 NBA players in the starting lineup and we couldn’t muster a .500 record or qualify for the NIT. How is that not anything less than terrible? You believe that was a good season because we improved over the previous year?

Would you have fired Kevin Willard after 4 seasons? 66-65

After 5 seasons 82-80?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 06:42:09 PM
Not argue, they did. Roberts, Earlington, Williams, and 4* big Keita.
Keita was unplayably bad last season and you know it.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 06:43:08 PM
Bottom line is we were deeper last year.
"There are none so blind than those that will not see".
- B are F
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 21, 2020, 06:43:40 PM
Keita was unplayably bad last season and you know it.
And you me boy gave him 2 years of scholarship. Hysterical! You think you are arguing in favor of mullin.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 21, 2020, 06:44:38 PM
Would you have fired Kevin Willard after 4 seasons? 66-65

After 5 seasons 82-80?
Kevin Williard was working his ass off. Those guys get a little more leeway. He is also competent. Not the same thing.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 06:45:27 PM
You're delusional.

Roberts was third string last year, this year he’s our starter. It’s not because he’s improved so much year over year.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 06:46:04 PM
And you me boy gave him 2 years of scholarship. Hysterical! You think you are arguing in favor of mullin.
I'm not arguing for Chris and against CFC -  I'm stating facts. You've admitted that you are unable to comprehend my very simple points. Let's leave it at that.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 21, 2020, 06:52:10 PM
I'm not arguing for Chris and against CFC -  I'm stating facts. You've admitted that you are unable to comprehend my very simple points. Let's leave it at that.
Keita sucked and he is a terrible person. And your boy gave him 2 years of scholarship. A normal person would see that as a red flag against the coach. Not you. Just more bad luck for coach mullin.
Imagine if he actually spent time scouting and recruiting players. Maybe just maybe keita and Trimble wouldn’t have been here.
Oh shit, forgot about Mikey Dixon. 2 years and 8 big east minutes. Imagine if your boy tried? He might have had some depth on his team.
What is your point again?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 06:54:02 PM
Would you have fired Kevin Willard after 4 seasons? 66-65

After 5 seasons 82-80?

Was KW losing at home to NJIT and giving up 90 points getting blown out by power house St. Thomas Aquinas?

Unfortunately those were harbinger of things to come. Sorry I don’t believe just trying to out score your opponent without focusing on defense and rebounding is a recipe for success. We were still going to be bad this year if we hadn’t made a coaching change.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 07:03:48 PM
Keita was unplayably bad last season and you know it.

He’s a big body who can bang down low and run the floor. He wasn’t afraid of contact. He played over Roberts for a reason.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 07:58:36 PM
In what universe is a overall record of 59-73 (20-52 BE record) not terrible?

 
In no universe. It's an awful record for St. Johns.

Yet following down that path, what incentive, other than money of course, would there be for any coach to accept a complete rebuild/overhaul only to be criticized eventually on your overall record when the reality is there was absolutely no chance in hell to have anything but a horrendous record your first two seasons?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 07:59:49 PM
He’s a big body who can bang down low and run the floor. He wasn’t afraid of contact. He played over Roberts for a reason.
He had no positive attributes. Unplayable.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 21, 2020, 08:01:03 PM
Roberts was third string last year, this year he’s our starter. It’s not because he’s improved so much year over year.

You postulate that SJU was "deeper last year" than this. Last year SJU played five guys 30 plus minutes a game. The sixth most minutes went to Mikey Dixon, who left mid year, and the seventh to Brian Trimble. Your proof that last year's team had more depth than this is that Josh Roberts, who played six minutes a game last year starts on this years team and plays nearly 20 minutes a game among eight players who play more than 15 minutes a game and nine who play double figure minutes. 

I'd say I don't like to call people stupid but that woud be a lie. I love to call people names, especially people who oblige me by demonstrating how appropriate the names I call tham are. Like you've just done.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 08:07:46 PM
You postulate that SJU was "deeper last year" than this. Last year SJU played five guys 30 plus minutes a game. The sixth most minutes went to Mikey Dixon, who left mid year, and the seventh to Brian Trimble. Your proof that last year's team had more depth than this is that Josh Roberts, who played six minutes a game last year starts on this years team and plays nearly 20 minutes a game among eight players who play more than 15 minutes a game and nine who play double figure minutes. 

I'd say I don't like to call people stupid but that woud be a lie. I love to call people names, especially people who oblige me by demonstrating how appropriate the names I call tham are. Like you've just done.
Hey I like that. Go right to a comparison of minutes played as proof of depth. Who could argue with that?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 21, 2020, 08:09:08 PM
He played over Roberts for a reason.

Would this be the same Roberts who just two posts ago you cited as proof of why SJ had such great depth last year? Or was that another Roberts you were referring to? Julia Roberts maybe? Doris? Oral? Pernell? They were all such great ball players. Do tell. 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 08:21:44 PM
It's somewhat surprising that the traitors are not appreciative of the upward trajectory that Mullin's coaching career exemplified as it's exactly the same one followed by two semi-recent fan favorite player classes:

The Paris Horne class was hammered unmercifully on this board for three years until they finally broke through in their senior season with an opening game Ncaa tournament loss. Now Hilton, DJ, JB1, Malik2, Evans et all are remembered fondly due solely to their final season.

The Phil Greene class met the same derogatory treatment here for three years until they finally broke through in their senior season with an opening game Ncaa tournament loss.
Now the Rectangle, 3'lo and Sir Dom are widely revered.

Why did the most important figure in the history of the program not get justified recognition and appreciation from some for the same departing triumph?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: ras on February 21, 2020, 10:20:12 PM
Yes you could.

Or you could make the argument that these freshmen just weren't ready as Duke didn't know the difference between a field goal and a pick and roll at that point and Dr. Roberts weighed less than me and I'm way, way short of 6'. Additionally, you could argue that the patient way they were allowed to develop last season has led to the nothing short of a revelation that Earlington has been this season.
You second argument has some validity. The problem was we had no depth . I believe the players were worn out by the end of the year playing so many minutes. That is why we tanked at the end of the season.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 21, 2020, 10:24:28 PM
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round, the wheels on the bus go round and round, so early in the morning. Carry on on your fools errand. Anybody ever going to learn everyone is entrenched in their positions and further arguing is both futile and redundant?  ::)
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 10:32:58 PM
You second argument has some validity. The problem was we had no depth . I believe the players were worn out by the end of the year playing so many minutes. That is why we tanked at the end of the season.
There's no question we had no depth. Ridiculous posts immediately proceeding this to the contrary aside. You could be right.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 21, 2020, 10:34:15 PM
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round, the wheels on the bus go round and round, so early in the morning. Carry on on your fools errand. Anybody ever going to learn everyone is entrenched in their positions and further arguing is both futile and redundant?  ::)
It reminds me of today's political landscape.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 21, 2020, 11:35:10 PM
Hey I like that. Go right to a comparison of minutes played as proof of depth. Who could argue with that?

Only simpletons would buy that argument. Oh wait.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Gee Whiz on February 22, 2020, 12:08:56 AM
Mullin had no/minimal depth because he was responsible for that. I don’t get why that’s not a fault attributed to him. It’s not an excuse for him. He didn’t have a GM who failed him. It was his job to complete the roster.

I love Mullin, reason why I am a fan and which ultimately drove me to attend, but they did him a favor as his “upward trajectory” was going to end this year if he was retained.

And btw, this has nothing to do vs Anderson. Judgment still open on his tenure.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 22, 2020, 12:47:42 AM
This thread is like Groundhog Day
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 22, 2020, 12:48:41 AM
In no universe. It's an awful record for St. Johns.

Yet following down that path, what incentive, other than money of course, would there be for any coach to accept a complete rebuild/overhaul only to be criticized eventually on your overall record when the reality is there was absolutely no chance in hell to have anything but a horrendous record your first two seasons?

He didn’t inherit a complete rebuild. He created one. He inherited a team coming off back to back 20 win seasons and a NCAA tournament appearance. Two top 100 kids signed. Most coaches would have excelled in that situation. Open ships, opportunity to bring in their own players. Mullin going 4-14 in year 3 with 3 NBA players in the starting line up. If Anderson does that fire him immediately.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 22, 2020, 12:57:33 AM
Would this be the same Roberts who just two posts ago you cited as proof of why SJ had such great depth last year? Or was that another Roberts you were referring to? Julia Roberts maybe? Doris? Oral? Pernell? They were all such great ball players. Do tell. 

I didn’t say they had great depth last year. I said last years team had more depth. Comparatively speaking. Roberts is the same player he was last year, only difference is Anderson doesn’t have a better option.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 22, 2020, 01:04:24 AM
Yes you could.

Or you could make the argument that these freshmen just weren't ready as Duke didn't know the difference between a field goal and a pick and roll at that point and Dr. Roberts weighed less than me and I'm way, way short of 6'. Additionally, you could argue that the patient way they were allowed to develop last season has led to the nothing short of a revelation that Earlington has been this season.

They weren’t ready? They still aren’t ready!!!!! There is a difference between depth and quality depth. If Rutherford and Roberts are your starters, how bad must your back ups be? Just because the back ups play doesn’t mean you have quality depth, it means you extend your bench. That’s a coaching philosophy.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 22, 2020, 01:37:40 AM
He didn’t inherit a complete rebuild. He created one. He inherited a team coming off back to back 20 win seasons and a NCAA tournament apearance. Two top 100 kids signed. Most coaches would have excelled in that situation. Open ships, opportunity to bring in their own players. Mullin going 4-14 in year 3 with 3 NBA players in the starting line up. If Anderson does that fire him immediately.

This is complete utter nonsense. He didn't inherit two top 100 kids. Those kids hadn't even stepped one foot on campus yet. Samir wasn't top 100 either. Those kids commited to Steve Lavin period. Rysheed had stopped going to class and wasn't going to be eligble. When he decided he wanted to come play for Mullin it was too late.

How has Anderson excelled with open schollies? He filled them with McGriff, Sears,Rutherford, and Champiagne (who looks like he will be ok). He hasn't brought in a top 100 kid yet. 

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 22, 2020, 02:55:35 AM
This is complete utter nonsense. He didn't inherit two top 100 kids. Those kids hadn't even stepped one foot on campus yet. Samir wasn't top 100 either. Those kids commited to Steve Lavin period. Rysheed had stopped going to class and wasn't going to be eligble. When he decided he wanted to come play for Mullin it was too late.

How has Anderson excelled with open schollies? He filled them with McGriff, Sears,Rutherford, and Champiagne (who looks like he will be ok). He hasn't brought in a top 100 kid yet. 

I was referring to Jordan and CO. Jordan never went to class. Didn’t stop him from being eligible before. Mullin didn’t care for the drama and didn’t want to babysit. That’s his choice. He could have had Jordan and CO if he wanted them.

You’ll see next year how Anderson has done.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on February 22, 2020, 04:13:11 AM
Wins are objective and can be measured:

1st season   8-24
2nd season 14-19
3rd season  16-17
4th season  21-13*

*Ncaa tournament bid

Take note of the upward trajectory and the * footnote.

Lets be honest here, Mullins 3rd year here was an utter embarrassment. That roster and 4-14 in conference is inexcusable. If you think that year was an improvement than you have some issues. I think we can all agree on that. He was worse from year 2 to year 3 in the conference and thats what matters. Obviously he was going to get better from year 1 to year two because they won 1 conference game in his first year......
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 22, 2020, 05:57:49 AM
It's somewhat surprising that the traitors are not appreciative of the upward trajectory that Mullin's coaching career exemplified as it's exactly the same one followed by two semi-recent fan favorite player classes:

The Paris Horne class was hammered unmercifully on this board for three years until they finally broke through in their senior season with an opening game Ncaa tournament loss. Now Hilton, DJ, JB1, Malik2, Evans et all are remembered fondly due solely to their final season.

The Phil Greene class met the same derogatory treatment here for three years until they finally broke through in their senior season with an opening game Ncaa tournament loss.
Now the Rectangle, 3'lo and Sir Dom are widely revered.

Why did the most important figure in the history of the program not get justified recognition and appreciation from some for the same departing triumph?

Norm Roberts didn’t have a chance. He was unable to compete. The other teams were that much better. I was around during his days. From memory he wasn’t constantly bashed. It was understood he was in over his head. Maybe in the early years people stuck up for him. By the end their was no debate. Lavin’s 1st year was amazing. He proved that you can win here.
Phil Greene’s team won. I enjoyed watching them for 4 years. Your stupid theory about the tournament is non sense. That team bullied the big east at times. They didn’t win as much as would have liked. But we had a team to be proud of.
As fast as Lavin made us relevant coach Mullin made us terrible. We went from Deangelo Harrison and dom pointer to that shit. 5 years and counting of losing is all on coach muggggles.
This school is not cursed. The norm Roberts experience shouldn’t have lasted 6 years. And someone with a brain should have interviewed Chris mullin. It would have been OBVIOUS that he didn’t have a clue what he was doing or the work ethic needed to do the job. 2 lazy hall of famers are not better then none.
You should end your ridiculous crusade. Chris mullin doesn’t even follow college basketball.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 22, 2020, 11:40:32 AM
I was referring to Jordan and CO. Jordan never went to class. Didn’t stop him from being eligible before. Mullin didn’t care for the drama and didn’t want to babysit. That’s his choice. He could have had Jordan and CO if he wanted them.

You’ll see next year how Anderson has done.

Obekpa had just committed the cardinal sin of getting suspended from an Ncaa tournament bid for smoking the ganj and Jordan was in federal prison on felony charges a short while after. You think it would have been easy to keep these two on the roster?

News flash: Mullin found to be responsible for climate change. Story at 11.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 22, 2020, 12:22:34 PM
Obekpa had just committed the cardinal sin of getting suspended from an Ncaa tournament bid for smoking the ganj and Jordan was in federal prison on felony charges a short while after. You think it would have been easy to keep these two on the roster?

News flash: Mullin found to be responsible for climate change. Story at 11.

Again he was left with two top 100 players, one being the highest rated player the school got in a very long time. He could have had them on the team IF he wanted them. It would have required a hands on approach. He didn’t want to do that fine that’s his choice. The roster he ended up with was HIS doing. He continued to reap the benefits of Lavin’s recruiting after Lavin left. That is not a program needing to be rebuilt. Who are the players that Mullin and company had real interest in the school? Mack? The program was on life support and Anderson is being tasked with bringing it out of comatose.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 22, 2020, 12:40:34 PM
This thread is like Groundhog Day
How can you say that?

I just came up with a brand spanking new take on the issue in which I cleverly and accurately compare the playing careers of the Paris Horne and Phil Greene classes to the coaching career of the legend.

"That's gold Jerry, gold!"
- Kb
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 22, 2020, 12:48:05 PM
Again he was left with two top 100 players, one being the highest rated player the school got in a very long time. He could have had them on the team IF he wanted them. It would have required a hands on approach. He didn’t want to do that fine that’s his choice. The roster he ended up with was HIS doing. He continued to reap the benefits of Lavin’s recruiting after Lavin left. That is not a program needing to be rebuilt. Who are the players that Mullin and company had real interest in the school? Mack? The program was on life support and Anderson is being tasked with bringing it out of comatose.
When coaching changes are made - roster change typically accompanies it. While CFC deserves credit for retaining most of the talent from the previous regime - Mullin doesn't deserve blame for not being able to keep all of them. It's an unpredictably dicey situation in general made dicier by a player facing suspension/disciplinary action for smoking cheeba and a player who had ceased going to class, was driving to Philly constantly and was a hop skip and a jump from the penitentiary.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 22, 2020, 03:13:51 PM

News flash: Mullin found to be responsible for climate change. Story at 11.
[/quote]
No he is just the worst coach in sports history. I think that’s enough
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 23, 2020, 10:37:55 AM
No he is just the worst coach in sports history. I think that’s enough

It's takes like this I just don't get. I'm not saying he was the best but he was improving. St. John's is far from a juggernaut either. What did you expect within 4 years?

There are things that needed to be fixed but imo they were correctable. 

Season 1 was a throw away.
Season 2 you saw the building blocks.
Season 3 was disappointing because of Lovett.
Season 4 we danced. Could have been better sure.

Continuity creates stability. We took a step back to try and take 2 steps forward but we might not take one step forward.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: prjohnnies on February 23, 2020, 10:44:21 AM
I love Mullin and always will so you won’t get the piling on from me.

But I see progress this year with the limited roster. If we pulled out Gtown and X the narrative is different. I’m pleased with the development of certain kids and attribute that to Anderson and the staff.

There are no moral victories but losing many close games is better than the number of absolute blowouts we saw too often in the past.

I think once Anderson increases the talent level, maintains stability/continuity and brings in more kids to fit his system, we are going to be a solid perennial program again. It’s up to them to recruit smart and well enough to make that happen.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on February 23, 2020, 10:47:46 AM
+1

I love Mullin and always will so you won’t get the piling on from me.

But I see progress this year with the limited roster. If we pulled out Gtown and X the narrative is different. I’m pleased with the development of certain kids and attribute that to Anderson and the staff.

There are no moral victories but losing many close games is better than the number of absolute blowouts we saw too often in the past.

I think once Anderson increases the talent level, maintains stability/continuity and brings in more kids to fit his system, we are going to be a solid perennial program again. It’s up to them to recruit smart and well enough to make that happen.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 23, 2020, 10:53:33 AM
I love Mullin and always will so you won’t get the piling on from me.

But I see progress this year with the limited roster. If we pulled out Gtown and X the narrative is different. I’m pleased with the development of certain kids and attribute that to Anderson and the staff.

There are no moral victories but losing many close games is better than the number of absolute blowouts we saw too often in the past.

I think once Anderson increases the talent level, maintains stability/continuity and brings in more kids to fit his system, we are going to be a solid perennial program again. It’s up to them to recruit smart and well enough to make that happen.

I think this is fair take. While I think some is due to natural maturation, Anderson does deserves credit for guys developing. I also applaud the stability and daily preparation that was immediately established.

What I'm fearful and concerned about is that the talent level will be too far inferior to make up gap to climb. Additionally I think the style of play will yield better results in OCC than it will in conference. We'll catch teams by surprise and punch them in the mouth OOC but in conference that will be scouted and figured out.

Ultimately the floor rises but the ceiling is another story
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: prjohnnies on February 23, 2020, 12:39:44 PM
As to whether his system plays in the BE, doesn’t that depend on the types of kids we get. An upgrade at the PG slot for late game stability, even minor, and/or another kid that can score a bit more on the wing/guard slot probably gives us a few more W’s in BE play minimum. His system has caused problems for many in-conference opponents, it’s just a matter of having a more balanced team with another playmaker or two (even not of any significant level) to close out those games.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnnies93!! on February 23, 2020, 01:15:29 PM
As to whether his system plays in the BE, doesn’t that depend on the types of kids we get. An upgrade at the PG slot for late game stability, even minor, and/or another kid that can score a bit more on the wing/guard slot probably gives us a few more W’s in BE play minimum. His system has caused problems for many in-conference opponents, it’s just a matter of having a more balanced team with another playmaker or two (even not of any significant level) to close out those games.

The players coming in will def sure up some of our late game breakdowns....having a quality point guard is a premium especially at the end of games...Let’s just land the big next year and I think we will be much better at closing out games...
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 23, 2020, 01:25:53 PM
As to whether his system plays in the BE, doesn’t that depend on the types of kids we get. An upgrade at the PG slot for late game stability, even minor, and/or another kid that can score a bit more on the wing/guard slot probably gives us a few more W’s in BE play minimum. His system has caused problems for many in-conference opponents, it’s just a matter of having a more balanced team with another playmaker or two (even not of any significant level) to close out those games.

This is what many are really not realizing, how inept our roster is and just the slightest influx of talent will make a difference. Those who say we are not rebuilding have a agenda. To inherit a team that only had two starters in the entire roster and expect them to compete simply because of those two players is nonsense.

Then those same people will say Mullin going 4-14 is LoVett fault even though he still had a 3 NBA players, Clark, and Ahmed. Yet Anderson sitting on 3 wins should do better because he inherited LJ and a banged up Heron and nothing else.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 23, 2020, 01:46:03 PM
It's takes like this I just don't get. I'm not saying he was the best but he was improving. St. John's is far from a juggernaut either. What did you expect within 4 years?

There are things that needed to be fixed but imo they were correctable. 

Season 1 was a throw away.
Season 2 you saw the building blocks.
Season 3 was disappointing because of Lovett.
Season 4 we danced. Could have been better sure.

Continuity creates stability. We took a step back to try and take 2 steps forward but we might not take one step forward.

You asked me why I hate him. I just told you. If someone just read your post about him they would think he was ok.
Year 1- why would I or anyone be ok with a throw away season. We just came off of 5 years of relevance. Only to be awful.
Year 2- building blocks to what? Last place?
Year 3- last Place AGAIN! 0-11 to start the conference.
Year 4- we dance
Year 5- COMPLETE rebuild needed.
I expected way better then 20-59. For the 1000th time more then half of those losses weren’t even competitive. The experiment was an absolute failure.
Do any of you think we finish in 8th or lower if Lavin stayed for another 4 years even 1 time?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 23, 2020, 10:35:22 PM
Those who say we are not rebuilding have a agenda. 
Team 1: Jones, Balamou, Alibagovic

Team 2: LJ, Heron, Earlington, Williams, Roberts, Caraher, Steere

Question: Which coach inherited the worst team in the history of St. John's university? An utter, complete and total rebuild! A team Dean Smith couldn't win with.

Which coach inherited a team with far more functional parts in general, and two inarguably high level talents deemed so precocious that they were pre-season 2nd team all-conference selections in particular? One of whom even looked like a star player this very day on the road against the best team in the conference. The games leading scorer against a D solely designed to stop him. Not a rebuild!
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 23, 2020, 11:12:18 PM
News flash: Mullin found to be responsible for climate change. Story at 11.

No he is just the worst coach in sports history. I think that’s enough
Which one of the traitors said something to the effect of 'just wait and see the havoc CFC's defense plays on some of these lazy ass Be teams'. Was that you?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 23, 2020, 11:48:48 PM
Which one of the traitors said something to the effect of 'just wait and see the havoc CFC's defense plays on some of these lazy ass Be teams'. Was that you?
I said soft big east teams. No team has ever been lazy except Mullin. This big East is much less soft then the last few.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 24, 2020, 10:20:41 AM
You asked me why I hate him. I just told you. If someone just read your post about him they would think he was ok.
Year 1- why would I or anyone be ok with a throw away season. We just came off of 5 years of relevance. Only to be awful.
Year 2- building blocks to what? Last place?
Year 3- last Place AGAIN! 0-11 to start the conference.
Year 4- we dance
Year 5- COMPLETE rebuild needed.
I expected way better then 20-59. For the 1000th time more then half of those losses weren’t even competitive. The experiment was an absolute failure.
Do any of you think we finish in 8th or lower if Lavin stayed for another 4 years even 1 time?

Year 1 saw a ton of graduates and recruits that left due to coaching change. I've always said I wouldn't have let go of Lavin. It's the same fate Mullin had. You need to double down and make things work.

I think your take is extreme. If that's the way you feel then ok but I disagree. However you feel though stop with the disrespect to Mullin. The constant misspelling of his name is childish.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: talkbigeast on February 24, 2020, 10:46:11 AM
The Spelling of his last name is just as childish as Carmine with his CFC for Anderson....if we going to go after one go after Carmine to.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 24, 2020, 11:02:13 AM
The Spelling of his last name is just as childish as Carmine with his CFC for Anderson....if we going to go after one go after Carmine to.

Carmine makes nicknames for every player. It's not singled out. He's not trying to be demeaning using an intentional misspelling of his name.

It started with Tony intentionally misspelling his name which I autocorrected in the banned words and that triggered him using demeaning word that resembles his name. There has been 12+ words added to ban list due to Tony. It's blatant and intentional
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 24, 2020, 11:19:14 AM
I said soft big east teams. No team has ever been lazy except Mullin. This big East is much less soft then the last few.
My bad.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 24, 2020, 11:22:51 AM
The Spelling of his last name is just as childish as Carmine with his CFC for Anderson....if we going to go after one go after Carmine to.
That comparison doesn't fly.

One is a Razorback with no prior ties to the region or school who's been here a New York minute.

The other is Chris Mullin.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: talkbigeast on February 24, 2020, 11:48:15 AM
question for you Why do I have to have Chris Mullin on this pedestal when I never saw him play once? As a younger generation fan the only Mullin memories I have is how he was an awful Coach. That's my memory. I was not even born when he was playing. Yes he is the schools best player and I will respect that and cheer for him whenever he is back at MSG but he played in the 80's and has ZERO relevance to my St. John's Rooting years.....awesome he was hell of a player a legend at st. johns but he was a AWFUL coach and will be forever linked to that also......Get out of the 80's we are in 2020. We are not talking about playing years we are talking about his Coaching.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 24, 2020, 01:11:39 PM
Carmine makes nicknames for every player. It's not singled out. He's not trying to be demeaning using an intentional misspelling of his name.

It started with Tony intentionally misspelling his name which I autocorrected in the banned words and that triggered him using demeaning word that resembles his name. There has been 12+ words added to ban list due to Tony. It's blatant and intentional
Instead what if I suggested other posters had sex with she males? Would that be more appropriate? What if my name was fxck off and die? What if I called other posters cunts? Coach 4th choice is just as childish as coach Mullin.
I am the only one being reprimanded. I told you last week I would stop, until provoked.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 24, 2020, 01:51:11 PM
I am de ownwy one being wepwimanded

Speaking of butt hurt.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 24, 2020, 02:16:12 PM
Speaking of butt hurt.
Not butt hurt at all. I think it’s hysterical when you guys get mad. Write another play loser. 60 year old man named himself fxck off and die. Even after all these years it’s hysterical.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 24, 2020, 02:44:01 PM
Team 1: Jones, Balamou, Alibagovic

Team 2: LJ, Heron, Earlington, Williams, Roberts, Caraher, Steere

Question: Which coach inherited the worst team in the history of St. John's university? An utter, complete and total rebuild! A team Dean Smith couldn't win with.

Which coach inherited a team with far more functional parts in general, and two inarguably high level talents deemed so precocious that they were pre-season 2nd team all-conference selections in particular? One of whom even looked like a star player this very day on the road against the best team in the conference. The games leading scorer against a D solely designed to stop him. Not a rebuild!

Just because Anderson inherited a less terrible roster than Mullin doesn't
somehow mean this isn’t a rebuild. He inherited two starters, and some end of the bench players.

This is the BE. If your roster only has two starters on the roster your in trouble. Why is it difficult for you to grasp this concept?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 24, 2020, 03:11:46 PM
question for you Why do I have to have Chris Mullin on this pedestal when I never saw him play once? As a younger generation fan the only Mullin memories I have is how he was an awful Coach. That's my memory. I was not even born when he was playing. Yes he is the schools best player and I will respect that and cheer for him whenever he is back at MSG but he played in the 80's and has ZERO relevance to my St. John's Rooting years.....awesome he was hell of a player a legend at st. johns but he was a AWFUL coach and will be forever linked to that also......Get out of the 80's we are in 2020. We are not talking about playing years we are talking about his Coaching.

Answer for you: I don't think you have to have Chris Mullin on a pedestal. Maybe Carmine does, but he's not terribly bright. Ignore him, I have for 10 years and my life is far the richer for it. As to your memories I'm not much for post modernism but in this case you have your own version of the truth and you have every right to it.

Now I have question for you: why are we talking about Chris Mullin at all? He's not the coach, he's no longer affiliated with the university and I suspect that other than LC's funeral we're never going to see him again. So why are we talking about him? As far as I can tell it's because the only way defenders of Coach Home Run can defend Coach Home Run is to say well at least he's better than Mullin and to blame Mullin for CHR's failings. Well, in the first place, we'll see if CHR is better, because I think he stinks and as a long time SJ fan I can recognize stink when I see it. And in the second if Mullin was an AWFUL coach in all capital letters what kind of defense of CHR is it to say that he's better than AWFUL. There's lots of things that aren't awful that are still terrifically unpleasant. A pus-shake is better than a shit sandwich. (I speak from experience.) That's doesn't mean pus is delicious. Pol Pot murdered fewer people than Stalin, does that mean Pol Pot was a benevolent ruler? Or is it possible that neither had the best interest of their subjects at heart.

I can understand people who say: sure, this year kind of stinks but a little patience is in order, give the guy with a track record of success a chance to bring in his own players and implement his own system and develop a winning culture. That's reasonable. I don't know that that's what's happening but that's at least reasonable. What isn't reasonable is to say that this shit show of a year is the fault of the former AWFUL coach who despite having recruited the most talented roster in the BE last year left his predecessor with the worst roster in the league this year and that therefore we're completely rebuilding with two all BE preseason players who comprised 40 percent of the most talented roster evah. What isn't reasonable is to say that well, the coaches picked SJ ninth, so CHR is doing just about what was expected of him, but that OTOH the two all BE preseason players who are not performing up to expectations, that has nothing to do with the coach not putting them in a position to be successful - like they were under the most AWFUL coach evah - it's because they were highly over rated by exactly the same people who were 100 percent dead on balls accurate in their prediction about ninth place. See the contradiction there? Because I do.

Regarding Mullin being "forever linked to" being awful, yeah no, that's not going to happen. Mullin will forever be linked to being a two time HOF basketball players and arguably the greatest player in SJ history and his coaching record will be an asterisk. Nobody forever links Ted Williams to being a mediocre manager, they remember him as the greatest hitter in baseball history. Nobody mentions Wayne Gretsky's moribund coaching record, he's just the greatest. Remembering Mullin as a failed coach - and nearly nobody does except for a few chronic malcontent posters in an obscure corner of the internets - is like remembering Willie Mays as a guy who got bonked on the head with a fly ball in 1973. It's ahistorical nonsense.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 24, 2020, 04:33:01 PM
Carmine makes nicknames for every player. 
I just thought of a new one I want to start using for Champagnie.

Dom P, get it? It works on two levels. It's like Dominic Pointer - but champagne.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: goredmen on February 24, 2020, 04:41:58 PM
Nobody forever links Ted Williams to being a mediocre manager, they remember him as the greatest hitter in baseball history.

I remember him for his frozen head
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 24, 2020, 04:49:03 PM
question for you Why do I have to have Chris Mullin on this pedestal when I never saw him play once? As a younger generation fan the only Mullin memories I have is how he was an awful Coach. That's my memory. I was not even born when he was playing. Yes he is the schools best player and I will respect that and cheer for him whenever he is back at MSG but he played in the 80's and has ZERO relevance to my St. John's Rooting years.....awesome he was hell of a player a legend at st. johns but he was a AWFUL coach and will be forever linked to that also......Get out of the 80's we are in 2020. We are not talking about playing years we are talking about his Coaching.
I apologize in advance for climbing a soap box and for the two old guy responses in one day. I saw Doc's screed.

You don't have to have Chris Mullin on a pedestal.

Still, I never saw Babe Ruth and Joe DiMaggio play - I wasn't even born while they were playing, yet I do have them up on a pedestal.  I'm sure it doesn't apply to you, but it seems that the younger generation of today; a) don't read and b) have no sense of history.

I've read so much about and heard so many great things about the aforementioned Yankee legends that I revere them even though they were way ahead of my time. In my perfect world it would be the same with Chris from all those that consider themselves Johnny fans.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: cjfish on February 25, 2020, 10:36:25 AM
pain
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: cjfish on February 25, 2020, 10:37:25 AM
I just thought of a new one I want to start using for Champagnie.

Dom P, get it? It works on two levels. It's like Dominic Pointer - but champagne.


Pain
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 25, 2020, 12:50:29 PM
I just thought of a new one I want to start using for Champagnie.

Dom P, get it? It works on two levels. It's like Dominic Pointer - but champagne.

It’s stupid on multiple levels. Pointer and Champagnie are polar oppostites. Dom was all athletic talent and Champagnie is all skill.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 25, 2020, 12:59:27 PM
Anderson is a bad strategist and in-game coach that can be very successful if he recruits enough good players that fit his unique style.

What part of that is debatable? You’ve got four guys trying to convince the whole forum that he has it all as a coach. Spoiler alert:  he was just fired. Another spoiler alert:  we will never attract a coach who isn’t deeply flawed in one area or another.

I am giving him the benefit of the doubt that he know what he wants in a recruit and can attract the type of player he needs here. That’s not enough for some guys who feel the need to hammer their point through ten posts a day acting like he’s also Mike Dunlap on the dry erase board. That’s pure delusion. Accept him for what he is and shut up.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 25, 2020, 01:07:41 PM
Anderson is a bad strategist and in-game coach that can be very successful if he recruits enough good players that fit his unique style.

What part of that is debatable? You’ve got four guys trying to convince the whole forum that he has it all as a coach. Spoiler alert:  he was just fired. Another spoiler alert:  we will never attract a coach who isn’t deeply flawed in one area or another.

I am giving him the benefit of the doubt that he know what he wants in a recruit and can attract the type of player he needs here. That’s not enough for some guys who feel the need to hammer their point through ten posts a day acting like he’s also Mike Dunlap on the dry erase board. That’s pure delusion. Accept him for what he is and shut up.
Welcome back, great post. Plenty of new info. Mike Dunlap is probably better on a dry erase board, as is Greg St. Jean. Neither is or will ever be as accomplished as our home run hire Mike Anderson. No delusions just google it.
Dunlap has 1 winning season in 6 at Loyola Marymount. His record is 80-105. Mike Anderson will win his 400th game next year and is 170 games over .500
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: nudginator59 on February 25, 2020, 01:37:26 PM
If your optimistic on coach Anderson being successful here, this season not going to change your mind. If your a pessimist, the same goes for you.

It feels like this season could’ve (should’ve?) been more then it was. A lot of close losses and it feeling like the team grabbing defeat from the hands of victory.

Blame it on someone or some reason, but at the end of the day the buck stops with the coach, and the AD picked him.
 
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 25, 2020, 01:53:19 PM
Anderson is a bad strategist and in-game coach that can be very successful if he recruits enough good players that fit his unique style.

What part of that is debatable? You’ve got four guys trying to convince the whole forum that he has it all as a coach. Spoiler alert:  he was just fired. Another spoiler alert:  we will never attract a coach who isn’t deeply flawed in one area or another.

I am giving him the benefit of the doubt that he know what he wants in a recruit and can attract the type of player he needs here. That’s not enough for some guys who feel the need to hammer their point through ten posts a day acting like he’s also Mike Dunlap on the dry erase board. That’s pure delusion. Accept him for what he is and shut up.

Saying Anderson is a good coach does not mean he is absent of flaw. No one is saying this. He can have flaws and still be good for the program similar to Lavin.



Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 25, 2020, 01:58:06 PM
It’s stupid on multiple levels. Pointer and Champagnie are polar oppostites. Dom was all athletic talent and Champagnie is all skill.
Ok. How about Moet?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 25, 2020, 07:57:00 PM
Saying Anderson is a good coach does not mean he is absent of flaw. No one is saying this. He can have flaws and still be good for the program similar to Lavin.





Everyone is flawed you f*cking mongoloid. That statement has no relevance to any conversation on any topic. Ever. That Charles Manson, he’s not without flaws.

I just hope for your sake that you are not actually this stupid, and you are actually just a prolific troll that pretends to be stupid to piss people off. I could get behind the latter.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 25, 2020, 08:36:37 PM
Everyone is flawed you f*cking mongoloid. That statement has no relevance to any conversation on any topic. Ever. That Charles Manson, he’s not without flaws.

I just hope for your sake that you are not actually this stupid, and you are actually just a prolific troll that pretends to be stupid to piss people off. I could get behind the latter.

What’s wrong with you?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 25, 2020, 09:16:56 PM
What’s wrong with you?
He's just a happy go lucky guy.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 25, 2020, 09:23:47 PM
He's just a happy go lucky guy.
It is kind of funny
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on February 25, 2020, 10:10:55 PM
Everyone is flawed you f*cking mongoloid. That statement has no relevance to any conversation on any topic. Ever. That Charles Manson, he’s not without flaws.

I just hope for your sake that you are not actually this stupid, and you are actually just a prolific troll that pretends to be stupid to piss people off. I could get behind the latter.


This is crazy bro. Just take a step back.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 25, 2020, 10:33:31 PM
Everyone is flawed you f*cking mongoloid. That statement has no relevance to any conversation on any topic. Ever. That Charles Manson, he’s not without flaws.

I just hope for your sake that you are not actually this stupid, and you are actually just a prolific troll that pretends to be stupid to piss people off. I could get behind the latter.

You are the latter.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 25, 2020, 11:30:03 PM
This is crazy bro. Just take a step back.

I’m not crazy. I am just not absent flaw.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 25, 2020, 11:30:26 PM
You are the latter.

You fell off a ladder.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 26, 2020, 12:11:42 AM
What part of that is debatable?
Every part.

What he's accomplished at other outposts is irrelevant. St. John's is a whole other animal. He's about to have his first below .500 finish and he's coached for like 30 years at like 4 different spots. And it only took him 1 year here.

Contemplate that for a second.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 26, 2020, 12:13:38 AM
Neither is or will ever be as accomplished as our home run hire Mike Anderson. No delusions just google it.
Home runs at other programs quickly turn into ground out double plays in Queens. No delusions just google it.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 26, 2020, 01:29:30 AM
Everyone is flawed you f*cking mongoloid. That statement has no relevance to any conversation on any topic. Ever. That Charles Manson, he’s not without flaws.

I just hope for your sake that you are not actually this stupid, and you are actually just a prolific troll that pretends to be stupid to piss people off. I could get behind the latter.

Did you not say, “You’ve got four guys trying to convince the whole forum that he has it all as a coach“?

This goes way deeper than you being a fraud. You have something personal against this Old Red fella you keep accusing me of being.

What happened? Did he...touch you? Did he make you do things? It wasn’t your fault. Marillac...it wasn’t your FAULT!

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on February 26, 2020, 03:09:27 AM
Welcome back, great post. Plenty of new info. Mike Dunlap is probably better on a dry erase board, as is Greg St. Jean. Neither is or will ever be as accomplished as our home run hire Mike Anderson. No delusions just google it.
Dunlap has 1 winning season in 6 at Loyola Marymount. His record is 80-105. Mike Anderson will win his 400th game next year and is 170 games over .500

I wouldn't call it a home run hire at all. The hiring process was a joke, and the jury is still very much out on Anderson.

I hope he succeeds her and isn't like another Mullin, but in all honestly nothing this year has shown me that anything will be different at St. John's in the future. The braintrust is still in charge and that makes me very pessimistic.
 
I hope the class coming in next year surprise and play well together as a unit. I just don't get how so many of you have bought all the way in when nothing has been proven yet. Once he starts proving that he can win here, then he deserves the praise. Past records are impressive yes but do nothing for us here at St. John's.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 06:37:48 AM
Home runs at other programs quickly turn into ground out double plays in Queens. No delusions just google it.
It takes time to clean up after an absentee head coach.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 06:47:13 AM
I wouldn't call it a home run hire at all. The hiring process was a joke, and the jury is still very much out on Anderson.

I hope he succeeds her and isn't like another Mullin, but in all honestly nothing this year has shown me that anything will be different at St. John's in the future. The braintrust is still in charge and that makes me very pessimistic.
 
I hope the class coming in next year surprise and play well together as a unit. I just don't get how so many of you have bought all the way in when nothing has been proven yet. Once he starts proving that he can win here, then he deserves the praise. Past records are impressive yes but do nothing for us here at St. John's.

Why was the hiring process a joke? Because you read that on the internet from the mullin faithful. Our AD did his due diligence and hired us a real coach. Of course the jury is out on him, but his work ethic that he has shown here and his resume should give him the benefit of the doubt.
Our coach is the furthest thing from mullin on the planet. Honestly how many games did you expect to win this season? I wanted to be on the NIT bubble, does t look like we will get there. But their is still a chance.
I expect our coach to do his job. Why is that a bad thing? I only used (home run) to Antagonize the mongoloids.
I expect the next class to be good. I expect that Anderson and his staff will work hard with our current players. I expect next year to be better. I can’t imagine why someone would choose to think otherwise.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 26, 2020, 08:06:04 AM
Welcome back, great post. Plenty of new info. Mike Dunlap is probably better on a dry erase board, as is Greg St. Jean. Neither is or will ever be as accomplished as our home run hire Mike Anderson. No delusions just google it.
Dunlap has 1 winning season in 6 at Loyola Marymount. His record is 80-105. Mike Anderson will win his 400th game next year and is 170 games over .500

Over the course of his career Dunlap's won more games (405) than Coach Home Run (383), has lost fewer games (202) than CHR (213), and has a higher winning percentage (203 games over .500 = .667) than CHR (170 over = .643). He's also won two national championships, whereas CHR is one game over .500 in post season invitational tournaments and only if you count the NIT, which who does. Hmm mmm.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 26, 2020, 08:25:35 AM
I expect next year to be better. I can’t imagine why someone would choose to think otherwise.
Because we're losing our best two players and will be relying heavily on freshmen to handle the ball.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 08:32:04 AM
Over the course of his career Dunlap's won more games (405) than Coach Home Run (383), has lost fewer games (202) than CHR (213), and has a higher winning percentage (203 games over .500 = .667) than CHR (170 over = .643). He's also won two national championships, whereas CHR is one game over .500 in post season invitational tournaments and only if you count the NIT, which who does. Hmm mmm.
You are counting division 2? The lengths you pathetic losers are going to win some imaginary argument is beyond comical. You and your ilk were going to hate on whatever coach came after the hero just because you are sad butt hurt losers. Your boy was shit canned for cause, you can lie and say you don’t care but you are only lying to yourself.
The fact that you are siding with mike Dunlap is just as funny. You have no idea if is a good coach. You never heard of him before he was Lavin’s assistant. I would bet my life you haven’t watched 1 second of Loyola Marymount basketball. But you are arguing still because your a pathetic loser trying to prove some point on a fan board.
I really liked Dunlap while he was here. I tried to follow him when he got the job at Loyola. I am sure his teams are very well coached. That doesn’t mean he is better then Anderson. Their is more to being a head basketball coach then holding a dry erase board.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 08:46:37 AM
Because we're losing our best two players and will be relying heavily on freshmen to handle the ball.
Those guys were leaving after this year anyway. So again I don’t understand your point. Posh won’t be a liability.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 26, 2020, 08:56:31 AM
You are counting division 2?

Yes. Your experience consists of teaching 7th grade girls dodge ball and unsuccessfully interviewing for coveted JV coaching positions and that you think qualifies you as an expert witness on coaching so I'm counting winning multiple DII national championships as an accomplishment. Or do you figure Coach HR is more accomplished than Bob Hurley because Hurley's 25 state championships pale in comparison to HR's .500 NCAA tournament record. 

<shopworn rehash of sling blade's single thought hosed>
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 09:12:18 AM
Yes. Your experience consists of teaching 7th grade girls dodge ball and unsuccessfully interviewing for coveted JV coaching positions and that you think qualifies you as an expert witness on coaching so I'm counting winning multiple DII national championships as an accomplishment. Or do you figure Coach HR is more accomplished than Bob Hurley because Hurley's 25 state championships pale in comparison to HR's .500 NCAA tournament record. 

<shopworn rehash of sling blade's single thought hosed>
Winning multiple national championships is a great accomplishment. Dunlap is supposed to be a great teacher. But what does that have to with Mike Anderson? Dunlap hasn’t gotten a head coaching position in a major conference, why? He did get a job in the NBA, how did that turnout?
What are you trying to prove?
Coach Hurley at St. Anthony, was a great coach. What does that have to do with Mike Anderson? I think hurley’s skill set would have travelled to college but we are never going to know. Again what are you trying to prove?
What we do know is Mike Anderson has been a very successful college coach. Without looking I bet his post season record is better then your favorite coach Doug McDermott’s dad.
Chris mullin- you don’t have to be an expert on anything to realize coach fxck you was an empty suit
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 09:24:49 AM
Mike Anderson
9-9 NCAA tournament
4-3 NIT

Greg McDermott
3-8 NCAA tournament
2-1 nit
3-2 CBI

Ed Cooley
1-5 tournament NCAA tournament
3-3 nit
1-1 cit

Kevin Willard
1-4 NCAA
1-1 nit
Great points Foady.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 26, 2020, 09:34:02 AM
Winning multiple national championships is a great accomplishment. Dunlap is supposed to be a great teacher. But what does that have to with Mike Anderson?

What it has to do with Mike Anderson is you said "Mike Dunlap … will [n]ever be as accomplished as our home run hire Mike Anderson. No delusions just google it."

So I googled it and it turns out that you're delusional.

<remainder hosed>
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 09:46:46 AM
What it has to do with Mike Anderson is you said "Mike Dunlap … will [n]ever be as accomplished as our home run hire Mike Anderson. No delusions just google it."

So I googled it and it turns out that you're delusional.

<remainder hosed>
Again I can’t compete in your made up arguments. You win. Mike Dunlap coaching at metro state from the Rocky Mountain athletic conference is more prestigious then mike Anderson winning in the big 12 and SEC.

I always wanted to see a game at duke or Kansas. But I changed my mind. Next year I am flying out to Denver. I can’t wait to go to auraia center. That’s where the road  runners  of metro state play. We should all go. The arena only holds 2200 people. It’s gotta be an amazing environment.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 26, 2020, 11:04:01 AM
I can’t compete

Yes I know.

Quote
You win.

Obviously.


Quote
Mike Dunlap coaching at metro state from the Rocky Mountain athletic conference is more prestigious then mike Anderson winning in the big 12 and SEC.

I'm afraid we're never going to be able to come to agreement because having trouble with rudimentary logic and rhetoric (not to mention grammar and spelling but that's a question for another day) you can't follow an argument from point A to point B. Which means that you're forever lurching from non sequitur to irrelevancy and along the way creating an army of straw men, which they call them straw men because like you they haven't got a brain. See, first you said that Home Run was more accomplished than Dunlap and challenged all comers to disprove that statement. When that statement was in fact disproven you dragged poor Doug McDermott's father into it and Ed Cooley's diseased head and when that proved unavailing moved on to claiming that "winning" in the SEC - winning being defined as making the NCAA tournament three times in eight years - is more prestigous (prestigious being a word no one used) than "coaching" in the RMAC - coaching being defined as winning two national championships - because Metro State's arena "only holds 2200 people." So accomplished becomes prestigious and let me guess, if I were to point out that Mike Dunlap got hired by no less a personage than Michael Jordan to coach the Bobcats of the NBA who play in front of 20K people 40 times a year, all of which is much more prestigious than anything Home Run's managed,  arena size won't matter anymore and prestige won't either and Dunlap's record in a single year at Charlotte will be dispositive of his accomplishments in a way that Home Run's record in his single year at St John's can never be.

tl;dr: you're a dim bulb.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 26, 2020, 11:26:07 AM
Michael Jordan the player GOAT, MJ running a professional team an empty suit. Sound familiar to St. John's fans?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 26, 2020, 12:49:25 PM
Did you not say, “You’ve got four guys trying to convince the whole forum that he has it all as a coach“?

This goes way deeper than you being a fraud. You have something personal against this Old Red fella you keep accusing me of being.

What happened? Did he...touch you? Did he make you do things? It wasn’t your fault. Marillac...it wasn’t your FAULT!



I know you are world class in stupidity, but how is it possible for even you to not get my clear point?
Saying someone is “not absent flaw” or is not perfect isn’t a concession of any kind. It literally describes every human being that has ever lived.

It does nothing to differentiate anyone. Let’s have it your way...Mullin was not absent flaw. Anderson is not absent flaw. Let’s never compare them again. Case closed. Cheers.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 26, 2020, 12:53:35 PM
Why was the hiring process a joke? Because you read that on the internet from the mullin faithful. Our AD did his due diligence and hired us a real coach. Of course the jury is out on him, but his work ethic that he has shown here and his resume should give him the benefit of the doubt.
Our coach is the furthest thing from mullin on the planet. Honestly how many games did you expect to win this season? I wanted to be on the NIT bubble, does t look like we will get there. But their is still a chance.
I expect our coach to do his job. Why is that a bad thing? I only used (home run) to Antagonize the mongoloids.
I expect the next class to be good. I expect that Anderson and his staff will work hard with our current players. I expect next year to be better. I can’t imagine why someone would choose to think otherwise.

You must live under a rock. The college basketball world laughed at St. John's throughout the entire process. Mike Cragg looked an amateur (which he is). Hurley, Moser, & Odom all publicly turned down the job after offers. Tim Cluess pulled his name out of consideration. They then hired Anderson in a 24 hr period after it was reported that James Jones was going to get the job. If you don't believe me, Google it if your memory is that shot from Mullin's nuts smacking your forehead.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 26, 2020, 01:08:47 PM
You must live under a rock. The college basketball world laughed at St. John's throughout the entire process. Mike Cragg looked an amateur (which he is). Hurley, Moser, & Odom all publicly turned down the job after offers. Tim Cluess pulled his name out of consideration. They then hired Anderson in a 24 hr period after it was reported that James Jones was going to get the job. If you don't believe me, Google it if your memory is that shot from Mullin's nuts smacking your forehead.
I remember it very well. I would have been ok with any of the guys up for the job. Yes Hurley said no. As did porter moser. How is that embarrassing?
Within 10 days we made a great hire. Basically anyone would have been an upgrade. But lucky for me. We got someone that I like.
Tim cluess didn’t pull his name out of anything. If he was offered he would have taken the job. At that point no one in the basketball world was laughing.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 26, 2020, 01:15:16 PM
Mike Anderson
9-9 NCAA tournament
4-3 NIT

Greg McDermott
3-8 NCAA tournament
2-1 nit
3-2 CBI

Ed Cooley
1-5 tournament NCAA tournament
3-3 nit
1-1 cit

Kevin Willard
1-4 NCAA
1-1 nit
Great points Foady.

Mike Jarvis
7-9 NCAA (0-2 with low major BU)
5-4 NIT

Shitcanned


Steve Lavin
11-8 NCAA (0-2 with St. John’s)
1-2 NIT (all with St. John’s)
Made the tournament 6/7 years at UCLA

Shitcanned


Mike Anderson

17 years as a head coach with 0 losing seasons
1 losing season in 1 year at St. John’s
Has made the tournament 9x in 18 years as a head coach including making 6 of his first 9 and earning 7 of his 9 career NCAA wins (bad sign).
*In his last 10 seasons Anderson is 2-3 in the NCAA tournament and 2-2 in the NIT—at a better programs than St. John’s.

It doesn’t matter what someone does before St. John’s. They won’t make it here.


Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 26, 2020, 01:21:55 PM
You must live under a rock. The college basketball world laughed at St. John's throughout the entire process. Mike Cragg looked an amateur (which he is). Hurley, Moser, & Odom all publicly turned down the job after offers. Tim Cluess pulled his name out of consideration. They then hired Anderson in a 24 hr period after it was reported that James Jones was going to get the job. If you don't believe me, Google it if your memory is that shot from Mullin's nuts smacking your forehead.

He’s so stupid. We not only embarrassed our program and school, we embarrassed the entire conference.

We also let it be known with certainty that non-football conferences can’t compete for top coaches. To be fair that was suspicion but we removed any and all doubt.

Or coaching search was a debacle. It was like some kid professing his love to a girl at a pep rally with the whole school watching, getting turned down in brutal fashion, and then trying it with two other girls.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 26, 2020, 02:02:16 PM
So again I don’t understand your point. 
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
- AE
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 26, 2020, 02:08:30 PM
Tim cluess didn’t pull his name out of anything. If he was offered he would have taken the job.

"Iona head coach Tim Cluess withdrew his name from consideration for the head coaching vacancy at St. John's. Cluess, who at one point was reported to be the frontrunner to replace Chris Mullin, is the second coach to turn down the Red Storm. Loyola-Chicago head coach Porter Moser declined to take the job earlier this week. "

https://www.si.com/college/2019/04/18/iona-tim-cluess-st-johns-chris-mullin-replacement

etc

https://www.lohud.com/story/sports/college/iona/2019/04/18/tim-cluess-withdraws-name-saint-johns-job-stays-iona-college/3505640002/

etc

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jppelzman/2019/04/18/count-tim-cluess-among-those-who-are-tired-of-the-st-johns-coach-search-saga/#910c15e24214

etc

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2831937-ionas-tim-cluess-rejects-st-johns-head-coach-job-vacated-by-chris-mullin
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 26, 2020, 02:14:23 PM
The college basketball world laughed at St. John's throughout the entire process.

And they haven't stopped: Clark Kellog and Seth Davis laughed at us three days ago at halftime on national television.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 26, 2020, 05:33:06 PM
I know you are world class in stupidity, but how is it possible for even you to not get my clear point?
Saying someone is “not absent flaw” or is not perfect isn’t a concession of any kind. It literally describes every human being that has ever lived.

It does nothing to differentiate anyone. Let’s have it your way...Mullin was not absent flaw. Anderson is not absent flaw. Let’s never compare them again. Case closed. Cheers.

You don’t even know what your point is how could anyone else. Context is everything. You said, “as a coach”... “as a coach” that’s the context. Why would you apply my response outside of the context that is being discussed then accuse me of not following along is straight out the A.D.D handbook.

I thought you increased your meds? I’m worried for you.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on February 27, 2020, 02:18:36 AM
I remember it very well. I would have been ok with any of the guys up for the job. Yes Hurley said no. As did porter moser. How is that embarrassing?
Within 10 days we made a great hire. Basically anyone would have been an upgrade. But lucky for me. We got someone that I like.
Tim cluess didn’t pull his name out of anything. If he was offered he would have taken the job. At that point no one in the basketball world was laughing.



Totally agree with Redy2Rumble. How is it not embarrassing? Moser and Odom coach at 2 mid major schools and they did not want to take a job in the Big East......Tim Cluess who attended St. John's took his name out of consideration when he coaches at Iona....None of these coaches wanted to take a job at a Big east school in new york who plays home games at the worlds most famous arena, that my friend is a joke.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on February 27, 2020, 02:21:15 AM
Also, our biggest donor and alumni, Mike Repole openly blasted the coaching search on WFAN. I think he would know more than anyone. He even stated that it was a debate and a total joke, and that he didn't want to be involved anymore.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 09:12:40 AM
Totally agree with Redy2Rumble. How is it not embarrassing? Moser and Odom coach at 2 mid major schools and they did not want to take a job in the Big East......Tim Cluess who attended St. John's took his name out of consideration when he coaches at Iona....None of these coaches wanted to take a job at a Big east school in new york who plays home games at the worlds most famous arena, that my friend is a joke.
Embarrassing is getting killed in the big east tournament. Embarrassing is giving up 100 points. Embarrassing is watching your coach curse at people while the game is going around without him. The day we hired mike Anderson people stopped laughing at us.
Some of you should have discussions about basketball with others. The entire basketball world knew he was an empty suit. Did anyone of you here John Goodman the basketball reporter talk about mullin? He says the same as me.
Ready2rumble thinks mullin should have been given an extension. Carmine would say post something stupid like that. But he really knows.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 09:24:46 AM
Embarrassing is getting killed in the big east tournament. Embarrassing is giving up 100 points. Embarrassing is watching your coach curse at people while the game is going around without him. 
Embarrassing is 3 and 15 with two 2nd team all BE selections.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 27, 2020, 09:37:42 AM
Embarrassing is getting killed in the big east tournament. Embarrassing is giving up 100 points. Embarrassing is watching your coach curse at people while the game is going around without him. The day we hired mike Anderson people stopped laughing at us.
Some of you should have discussions about basketball with others. The entire basketball world knew he was an empty suit. Did anyone of you here John Goodman the basketball reporter talk about mullin? He says the same as me.
Ready2rumble thinks mullin should have been given an extension. Carmine would say post something stupid like that. But he really knows.

John Goodman was great in The Big Lebowski

Hate to break it to you people laughed at St. John's with Mullin and Anderson.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 27, 2020, 09:49:45 AM
John Goodman was great in The Big Lebowski

Cut him some slack. He obviously meant basketball writer Jeff Goldblum.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 27, 2020, 09:59:23 AM
Cut him some slack. He obviously meant basketball writer Jeff Goldblum.

lol
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Aknel79 on February 27, 2020, 10:12:19 AM
Embarrassing is getting killed in the big east tournament. Embarrassing is giving up 100 points. Embarrassing is watching your coach curse at people while the game is going around without him. The day we hired mike Anderson people stopped laughing at us.
Some of you should have discussions about basketball with others. The entire basketball world knew he was an empty suit. Did anyone of you here John Goodman the basketball reporter talk about mullin? He says the same as me.
Ready2rumble thinks mullin should have been given an extension. Carmine would say post something stupid like that. But he really knows.

I mean yeah all of that is embarrassing as well, but what does that have to do with the coaching search being embarrassing?

The sad thing is Dave is right.....we were  a joke under Mullin and still a joke so far under Anderson. Will that change? Time will tell.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 10:26:49 AM
I mean yeah all of that is embarrassing as well, but what does that have to do with the coaching search being embarrassing?

The sad thing is Dave is right.....we were  a joke under Mullin and still a joke so far under Anderson. Will that change? Time will tell.
If watched the game last night and saw the team as a joke, I feel bad for you.
April 9th we didn’t have a coach. April 19th we did. Tim cluess wasn’t offered the job. I know that for a fact.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 10:28:26 AM
John Goodman was great in The Big Lebowski

Hate to break it to you people laughed at St. John's with Mullin and Anderson.
Jeff Goodman. Once again Dave, you observed the same things I did. Unless you are blind and deaf.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 27, 2020, 10:39:13 AM
Embarrassing is 3 and 15 with two 2nd team all BE selections.

Embarrassing is going 4-14 with 3 NBA players. Going 3-15 with the worst roster in the BE is called rebuilding. One of the announcers last night stated “this is the roster Anderson inherited, help is on the way next year”.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 10:47:04 AM
Also, our biggest donor and alumni, Mike Repole openly blasted the coaching search on WFAN. I think he would know more than anyone. He even stated that it was a debate and a total joke, and that he didn't want to be involved anymore.
It’s all perspective. I was cheering in my car listening to that. I felt no shame. I felt relief. Either you believe in Cragg or you don’t. Cragg believes we can win here. The repole interview was great. The only thing he didn’t do was put blame on the hero. I don’t remember the date of the I interview. But from memory we got a new coach close to it.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 10:48:10 AM
Embarrassing is 3 and 15 with two 2nd team all BE selections.
Your a liar. We have 0 all big east selections on the team.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 27, 2020, 11:30:59 AM
Embarrassing is 3 and 15 with two 2nd team all BE selections.
Continue to maintain you never take a shot at Anderson. Doctors say there is no medicine like a good hearty laugh and you provide multiple ones on a daily basis. 2 all BE selections? Hahahaha! Pre season-guess they should just hand out the trophies before the season plays out. One of them has been injury riddled all season but then you knew that. You were just providing us with a good healthy hearty laugh. Hahahaha.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: derk on February 27, 2020, 11:31:33 AM
Your a liar. We have 0 all big east selections on the team.

At the beginning of the year both Figueroa and Heron were selected as 2nd team all BE players.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 11:33:56 AM
At the beginning of the year both Figueroa and Heron were selected as 2nd team all BE players.
Neither player achieved or will achieve all big East anything.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 27, 2020, 11:57:23 AM
At the beginning of the year both Figueroa and Heron were selected as 2nd team all BE players.

And that means exactly what now after the real games were played? Nada, zilch. Neither are getting any mention unless there's a biggest disappointment team.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 12:27:36 PM
And that means exactly what now after the real games were played? Nada, zilch. Neither are getting any mention unless there's a biggest disappointment team.
That’s not fair either. LJ is getting abused on Twitter. He hasn’t stopped playing hard. Yes he is taking bad shots. It’s not like their are better options. Heron is still involved. Both are good players and great kids. Neither is as good as we would have hoped. Neither regressed.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 27, 2020, 12:36:28 PM
That’s not fair either. LJ is getting abused on Twitter. He hasn’t stopped playing hard. Yes he is taking bad shots. It’s not like their are better options. Heron is still involved. Both are good players and great kids. Neither is as good as we would have hoped. Neither regressed.

They’re good players. They are not good enough to overcome the rosters short comings.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 27, 2020, 01:24:00 PM
Neither player achieved or will achieve all big East anything.

Heron achieved All-SEC twice. He and LJ were named two of the top 12 players in the league based off of their play the year before. The people who voted them there coached against them 2-3 games last season and coach basketball for a living.

Just because Anderson can’t use them effectively doesn’t mean they aren’t good players or worthy of those honors.

According to the Arkansas posters, Anderson has struggled with top tier players in the past including last year with Daniel Gafford—who was the 38th pick in the draft and is averaging 5 and 2.5 for the bulls.

What are the odds that our two best returning players and the #38 pick in the 2019 NBA draft were all underachievers in the span of two seasons?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 27, 2020, 01:30:30 PM
And that means exactly what now after the real games were played? Nada, zilch. Neither are getting any mention unless there's a biggest disappointment team.

And who do you think would be voted the coach of that team?

It would be unanimous. Anderson has done as poorly with this team as any coach in SJU history would have done. It’s completely and udderly indefensible. Creighton and Butler were voted just ahead of us at 7th and 8th, respectively, and both teams are in the top 25 of the NET and have been top 10 in the polls. Georgetown, bites #6 when they had All-League Akinjo and a full roster, swept us with 7 scholarship players.

Looking at next year and arguing why that will be different when he gets more guys he can use effectively is where the energy should be focused. Learn to concede sh*t points.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 01:37:34 PM
Ready2rumble thinks mullin should have been given an extension. Carmine would say post something stupid like that. 
Yes, Mullin should have been given an extension. Hollywood should have received one before him. Only Norm should have been shown the door after year 5 when his record stopped improving.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 01:42:01 PM
Embarrassing is going 4-14 with 3 NBA players. Going 3-15 with the worst roster in the BE is called rebuilding. One of the announcers last night stated “this is the roster Anderson inherited, help is on the way next year”.
Yes, there were embarrassing seasons under Mullin. That's what made the 4th season triumph all the more sweeter.  Who was the last coach we had no embarrassing seasons under. Fran?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 01:43:44 PM
Your a liar. We have 0 all big east selections on the team.
My bad. I said preseason selections the other 50 times I posted this. I forgot this once.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 01:48:01 PM
Continue to maintain you never take a shot at Anderson. Doctors say there is no medicine like a good hearty laugh and you provide multiple ones on a daily basis. 2 all BE selections? Hahahaha! Pre season-guess they should just hand out the trophies before the season plays out. One of them has been injury riddled all season but then you knew that. You were just providing us with a good healthy hearty laugh. Hahahaha.
That's not a shot. It's the truth. I bet if you asked CFC he would say that he's embarrassed by 3-15 and his first career below .500 finish.

I slip up once with loose fingers and the traitors pounce. You caught me. I meant preseason all BE. I think I said that every other time. Which has been a lot of times.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 01:56:07 PM
Neither player achieved or will achieve all big East anything.
Yeah, that's fractionally on the coach. You decide how much.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on February 27, 2020, 01:59:03 PM
Heron achieved All-SEC twice. He and LJ were named two of the top 12 players in the league based off of their play the year before. The people who voted them there coached against them 2-3 games last season and coach basketball for a living.

Just because Anderson can’t use them effectively doesn’t mean they aren’t good players or worthy of those honors.

According to the Arkansas posters, Anderson has struggled with top tier players in the past including last year with Daniel Gafford—who was the 38th pick in the draft and is averaging 5 and 2.5 for the bulls.

What are the odds that our two best returning players and the #38 pick in the 2019 NBA draft were all underachievers in the span of two seasons?

So the 31st ranked high school recruit gets drafted 38th overall after averaging 17 & 9 and shooting 66% from the field as a sophomore. That’s underachieving. Yea cherry pick the words of Arkansas fans who you would be disagreeing with if it didn’t fit your view. I mean whoever could be wrong about the team they root for? Havnt you read one of your posts the last year about http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMpsttlXye8&feature=relateds and single digit IQ’s?

You havnt used a bit of middle ground since mullin left sju. It’s getting to be pathetic.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 02:00:38 PM
Neither regressed.
Both regressed. A lot. And that's rare in a Johnny. Only Reggie Jessie comes to mind.

I've got nothing against the kid and don't know the details but Gil Scott didn't, or couldn't, try to rehab and make it back for the end of the season stint against ranked teams and the BE tournament. Outwardly it appears like he might have pulled a "Lovett".

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 02:16:47 PM
That's not a shot. It's the truth. I bet if you asked CFC he would say that he's embarrassed by 3-15 and his first career below .500 finish.

I bet you he would be. Our coach is trying and he is a competitor. Did coach muggggggles ever seem embarrassed?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 02:18:55 PM
Both regressed. A lot. And that's rare in a Johnny. Only Reggie Jessie comes to mind.

I've got nothing against the kid and don't know the details but Gil Scott didn't, or couldn't, try to rehab and make it back for the end of the season stint against ranked teams and the BE tournament. Outwardly it appears like he might have pulled a "Lovett".


You have nothing against the kid but you just called him a quitter. All to win an argument. Your boy was (not is) a bum.

Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Celtics11 on February 27, 2020, 03:05:55 PM
Both regressed. A lot. And that's rare in a Johnny. Only Reggie Jessie comes to mind.

I've got nothing against the kid and don't know the details but Gil Scott didn't, or couldn't, try to rehab and make it back for the end of the season stint against ranked teams and the BE tournament. Outwardly it appears like he might have pulled a "Lovett".


If Gil Scott is Heron he recently under went ankle surgery so no LoVett comparison is in order.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 27, 2020, 03:15:53 PM
That’s not fair either. LJ is getting abused on Twitter. He hasn’t stopped playing hard. Yes he is taking bad shots. It’s not like their are better options. Heron is still involved. Both are good players and great kids. Neither is as good as we would have hoped. Neither regressed.

That wasn't the point. The point that I replied to was neither will be on any All Big East team at this end of this season. Fact. End of story.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnny23 on February 27, 2020, 03:16:49 PM
And who do you think would be voted the coach of that team?

It would be unanimous. Anderson has done as poorly with this team as any coach in SJU history would have done. It’s completely and udderly indefensible. Creighton and Butler were voted just ahead of us at 7th and 8th, respectively, and both teams are in the top 25 of the NET and have been top 10 in the polls. Georgetown, bites #6 when they had All-League Akinjo and a full roster, swept us with 7 scholarship players.

Looking at next year and arguing why that will be different when he gets more guys he can use effectively is where the energy should be focused. Learn to concede sh*t points.

Way to try and change the subject. Forget the coach, focus on the players Einstein. Neither is making All Big East anything. That's a fact. I am right. Period.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: TONYD3 on February 27, 2020, 04:45:07 PM
Yes, there were embarrassing seasons under Mullin. That's what made the 4th season triumph all the more sweeter.  Who was the last coach we had no embarrassing seasons under. Fran?
Only mullin
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: cjfish on February 27, 2020, 06:14:28 PM
Yes, there were embarrassing seasons under Mullin. That's what made the 4th season triumph all the more sweeter.  Who was the last coach we had no embarrassing seasons under. Fran?
Triumph?? You are being silly.  Last year was an epic fold with good talent.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 27, 2020, 06:20:28 PM
Anderson has done as poorly with this team as any coach in SJU history would have done.

So it’s the roster and not the coach. Thanks for playing numnuts.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: cjfish on February 27, 2020, 06:22:45 PM
Your a liar. We have 0 all big east selections on the team.

THis team will forever in my mind be the gang who couldn't shoot straight.  Herons health hurt leaving only LJ as a consistent threat and opponents key on him and he is forced to take bad shots.  It is not on the coach, he cant shoot it for them.  The team hustles and produces good stats consistently but just cant score.  At the end of the game you have two choices, Dunn or LJ trying to force something with no point guard to set them up.  Too bad McGriff got hurt, I think he would have helped and will next year.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 27, 2020, 07:09:15 PM
The team hustles and produces good stats consistently but just cant score. 

Yeah, no. SJ is

10th in PF per game
10th in D reb allowed
8th in 3 pt FG allowed
7th in points allowed
6th in eFG allowed

and that's the defense, which is allegedly their strength. Not saying the offense isn't as bad, because it is. They absolutely stink on both sides of the ball. But they're not losing because they can't shoot, they're losing because the defense is atrocious.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Amaseinyourface2 on February 27, 2020, 07:51:00 PM
Yeah, no. SJ is

10th in PF per game
10th in D reb allowed
8th in 3 pt FG allowed
7th in points allowed
6th in eFG allowed

and that's the defense, which is allegedly their strength. Not saying the offense isn't as bad, because it is. They absolutely stink on both sides of the ball. But they're not losing because they can't shoot, they're losing because the defense is atrocious.

Def reb allowed has zero to do with defense and everything to do with not making shots.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: JohnnyJungle on February 27, 2020, 08:46:39 PM
Triumph?? You are being silly.  Last year was an epic fold with good talent.

Agreed last year was disappointing considering the potential.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 10:57:24 PM
You have nothing against the kid but you just called him a quitter. 
Already established that you don't understand my points. So, I'm not surprised that the use of caveats, disclaimers or the slightest nuance such as: "I've got nothing against the kid and don't know the details";  "didn't, or couldn't" ; and "outwardly" he "might' went sailing clear over your head.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 10:59:26 PM
If Gil Scott is Heron he recently under went ankle surgery so no LoVett comparison is in order.
I hadn't heard that. Surprised it wasn't on the board. I wish him well and a speedy recovery.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 27, 2020, 11:05:01 PM
Triumph?? You are being silly.  Last year was an epic fold with good talent.
Are you telling me that you can't see the triumph on Union of Utopia of an Ncaa tournament bid season while as we speak we're mired in the midst of a 3-15 no tournament bid disaster?

Mind boggling the mental contortions and gymnastics you guys will go through just to hate on my favorite programs Babe Ruth.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: RedStormNC on February 27, 2020, 11:43:38 PM
Also, our biggest donor and alumni, Mike Repole openly blasted the coaching search on WFAN. I think he would know more than anyone. He even stated that it was a debate and a total joke, and that he didn't want to be involved anymore.

Probably our biggest potential donor, but not the biggest to date.  Think he talks more than he contributes.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Redy2Rumble on February 28, 2020, 02:59:36 AM
Probably our biggest potential donor, but not the biggest to date.  Think he talks more than he contributes.

This is true. He was a big contributor during the Lavin years. He was one of the main reasons Lav was hired. Then Bobby G came along.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: cjfish on February 28, 2020, 09:04:40 AM
Are you telling me that you can't see the triumph on Union of Utopia of an Ncaa tournament bid season while as we speak we're mired in the midst of a 3-15 no tournament bid disaster?


love mullin and had great hopes for his tenure but he disappointed as a coach. And the team did fold  horribly. if you can’t see that you’re blind

Mind boggling the mental contortions and gymnastics you guys will go through just to hate on my favorite programs Babe Ruth.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on February 28, 2020, 10:51:45 AM
Mullin had one triumphant season.

Hollywood had 2 and was darn close to 2 more.

Norm had none.

Jarvis had several including the unheard of holy grail. An actual tournament win. However, it ended in scandal.

I'm only going back this century.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: derk on February 28, 2020, 01:59:50 PM
THis team will forever in my mind be the gang who couldn't shoot straight.  Herons health hurt leaving only LJ as a consistent threat and opponents key on him and he is forced to take bad shots.  It is not on the coach, he cant shoot it for them.  The team hustles and produces good stats consistently but just cant score.  At the end of the game you have two choices, Dunn or LJ trying to force something with no point guard to set them up.  Too bad McGriff got hurt, I think he would have helped and will next year.

The biggest mystery is what the hell happened to Figgy.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 28, 2020, 02:09:24 PM
So it’s the roster and not the coach. Thanks for playing numnuts.

Do you really think “numnuts” looks correct? You spell phonetically like a small child. Try harder, numbskull.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 28, 2020, 04:32:17 PM
Do you really think “numnuts” looks correct? You spell phonetically like a small child. Try harder, numbskull.

Maybe I don’t care geek. Lucky for me this is a basketball forum where we discuss basketball logic and not a spelling or grammar forum. Makes sense why you struggle with your idiotic takes.

Take your pocket protector and your playboy book and hide out in the bushes and play with yourself. Your a fraud who pretends to know something about basketball.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Foad on February 28, 2020, 05:15:52 PM
Your a fraud

You're.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 28, 2020, 09:10:57 PM
You're.

I know the proper usage.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on February 28, 2020, 09:38:31 PM

Take your pocket protector and your playboy book and hide out in the bushes and play with yourself. Your a fraud who pretends to know something about basketball.

Playboy is a magazine.

The rest of that is just troubling. How many people did you encounter masturbating in bushes as a child? Did you tell anyone at the time? Traumatic events like that could help explain why your growth in some areas has been so severely stunted. Thank you for sharing. I’m sure volunteering that kind of personal information can’t be easy.



Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Ez_Uzi on February 29, 2020, 03:02:09 AM
Playboy is a magazine.

Well, you don't know for sure ... SJUFAN could have had it "hard" bound?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on February 29, 2020, 06:27:13 PM
Yooooo y’all are a bunch of bitchesssss!!!!! Tight ass...ass holes!!!! Non-athletic, no game havin geeks!!!!! lol
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on March 01, 2020, 04:01:34 AM
Yooooo y’all are a bunch of bitchesssss!!!!! Tight ass...ass holes!!!! Non-athletic, no game havin geeks!!!!! lol

Dave, can we put this on the homepage?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: wpc77 on March 01, 2020, 10:15:03 AM
Dave, can we put this on the homepage?


Still shaking my head at this one.

Perhaps he clicked on a random insult generator and this was spat out?

Oh well.  Off to Jamaica for the McDermott clinic.  Hopefully won't get hotboxed by a COVID-19 carrier with the other 3k likely to be in attendance.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: SJUFAN on March 01, 2020, 12:33:09 PM
Dave, can we put this on the homepage?

Running to your daddy I see, dweeb.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on March 01, 2020, 01:17:19 PM
Running to your daddy I see, dweeb.

I haven’t had a daddy or grandparent since 8th grade. I run to my mommy.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Johnnies93!! on March 01, 2020, 06:41:38 PM
I haven’t had a daddy or grandparent since 8th grade. I run to my mommy.

I’m sure you will, but tough to find anything negative today....team played well all around and sealed the deal late, which we have had a chance to do a number of times, but haven’t...go johnnies!!!
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: Marillac on March 01, 2020, 08:28:23 PM
I’m sure you will, but tough to find anything negative today....team played well all around and sealed the deal late, which we have had a chance to do a number of times, but haven’t...go johnnies!!!

I have no interest in this season and haven’t for a long time. I only care about next season and those after that. The delusional maniacs that plague our fanbase get too high after wins and too low after losses. Some are talking NIT again.

I want to see the guys I like continue to do better so next year won’t be lost as well. Contrary to the four nice persons who think everyone is expendable, I know we can’t withstand losing players like Williams, Champagnie, or Earlington. Roberts is probably just behind that group as well. I think he could really be a player as an upperclassmen.

I also think Sears is a pretty solid player, he just happens to play the same position as two of our best four guys.

I am actually one of the more positive posters when it comes to the future. I have consistently posted that I think we will be on the bubble next year.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: apesNapes on March 09, 2020, 06:14:15 PM
where are they now:

bobby hurley: on the bubble again; looks like this will probably be his 3d straight year (out of 5 at ASU) making the tourney, but maybe in Dayton again

Cluess: IDK

Ryan Odom: Was this really a possiblity?  4th in Am. East, Playing 1 seed Vermont in conference semi-final

Porter Moser: Lost to 7 seed Valpo in the MVC tournament to dash his hopes of making the NCAA tournament for the second time in 7 years at Loyola Chicago. 

These were our top choices.  Hurley is doing an OK job at ASU.  I hope that over the next 5 years, Anderson will have a better record, but we'll see.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: RedStormNC on March 09, 2020, 08:15:05 PM
Don't forget James Jones at Yale.

23-7 in Ivy...1st place
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: apesNapes on March 09, 2020, 08:34:47 PM
Don't forget James Jones at Yale.

23-7 in Ivy...1st place
good call, totally forgot he interviewed.

James Jones: if he wins the Ivy tournament (forgot they started playing one), he would make his 3rd NCAA tournament in 20 years at Yale.
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: carmineabbatiello on March 10, 2020, 11:07:57 AM
good call, totally forgot he interviewed.

James Jones: if he wins the Ivy tournament (forgot they started playing one), he would make his 3rd NCAA tournament in 20 years at Yale.
"CSC"?
Title: Re: Mullin - Anderson Thread ***READ AT OWN RISK
Post by: talkbigeast on March 10, 2020, 11:40:39 AM
"CSC"?

Yale is going to NCAA tourney ...Ivy cancelled there tourney and awarded spot to 1st place team Yale