Quote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 10:41:40 AMQuote from: paultzman on April 10, 2012, 10:23:50 AMNot a big fan of Rothstein, but as I have noted, I agree.“@JonRothstein: Cincinnati going to be tough to beat @kthstlrfn any update on Chris obekpa?”Mint...?
Quote from: paultzman on April 10, 2012, 10:23:50 AMNot a big fan of Rothstein, but as I have noted, I agree.“@JonRothstein: Cincinnati going to be tough to beat @kthstlrfn any update on Chris obekpa?”Mint...
Not a big fan of Rothstein, but as I have noted, I agree.“@JonRothstein: Cincinnati going to be tough to beat @kthstlrfn any update on Chris obekpa?”
Quote from: mkras99 on April 10, 2012, 10:48:36 AMQuote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 10:41:40 AMQuote from: paultzman on April 10, 2012, 10:23:50 AMNot a big fan of Rothstein, but as I have noted, I agree.“@JonRothstein: Cincinnati going to be tough to beat @kthstlrfn any update on Chris obekpa?”Mint...?It is a famous Jon Rothstein saying...I was not suggesting I liked what he wrote. He will tweet something like, "Just had the Clams Casino at Dominick's on Arthur Ave in the Bronx...Mint."Jon is a super nice guy, but he is tweeting things already heard and made public. I think SJU made up a lot of ground but Cincy is still the team to beat for Chris.
Quote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 10:55:15 AMQuote from: mkras99 on April 10, 2012, 10:48:36 AMQuote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 10:41:40 AMQuote from: paultzman on April 10, 2012, 10:23:50 AMNot a big fan of Rothstein, but as I have noted, I agree.“@JonRothstein: Cincinnati going to be tough to beat @kthstlrfn any update on Chris obekpa?”Mint...?It is a famous Jon Rothstein saying...I was not suggesting I liked what he wrote. He will tweet something like, "Just had the Clams Casino at Dominick's on Arthur Ave in the Bronx...Mint."Jon is a super nice guy, but he is tweeting things already heard and made public. I think SJU made up a lot of ground but Cincy is still the team to beat for Chris.At this point what does "Cincy is still the team to beat for Chris " really mean. Don't you think the kid has already made up his mind ?. What is he expecting us to do that will change his mind ? What is he waiting for ? The highest bidder ? Perhaps waiting to see who else commits before he does ? He should have a pretty good idea of who his teammates will be for next year - on both teams.
In honor of the SHU Rivals.com board setting odds for the Kyle Anderson recruitment I will break it down this way for Obekpa:Cincy: 45.3%SJU: 44.7%Providence: 6.75% Oregon: 3.25%
Quote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 01:06:27 PMIn honor of the SHU Rivals.com board setting odds for the Kyle Anderson recruitment I will break it down this way for Obekpa:Cincy: 45.3%SJU: 44.7%Providence: 6.75% Oregon: 3.25%Ill take those odds FWIW id rather have (assuming eligibility) Sanches, chandler, and Nolan than Obekpa. But I would still love to have Obekpa
Quote from: Amaseinyourface2 on April 10, 2012, 01:23:53 PMQuote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 01:06:27 PMIn honor of the SHU Rivals.com board setting odds for the Kyle Anderson recruitment I will break it down this way for Obekpa:Cincy: 45.3%SJU: 44.7%Providence: 6.75% Oregon: 3.25%Ill take those odds FWIW id rather have (assuming eligibility) Sanches, chandler, and Nolan than Obekpa. But I would still love to have ObekpaYou can't prefer Nolan to Obekpa. Obekpa is more physically mature and can provide defense at such a high level it offsets the combination of lesser defense and maybe better offense out of Nolan. No doubt Nolan is the backup plan.
Quote from: Moose on April 10, 2012, 01:29:02 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on April 10, 2012, 01:23:53 PMQuote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 01:06:27 PMIn honor of the SHU Rivals.com board setting odds for the Kyle Anderson recruitment I will break it down this way for Obekpa:Cincy: 45.3%SJU: 44.7%Providence: 6.75% Oregon: 3.25%Ill take those odds FWIW id rather have (assuming eligibility) Sanches, chandler, and Nolan than Obekpa. But I would still love to have ObekpaYou can't prefer Nolan to Obekpa. Obekpa is more physically mature and can provide defense at such a high level it offsets the combination of lesser defense and maybe better offense out of Nolan. No doubt Nolan is the backup plan.Haha dont tell me what I can and can't do moose. Seriously though, from what ive seen from obekpa I just think he wont be able to see the floor very much in his first year or two because he will be a big liability on offense.Also moose I saw you mention on redmen that well get a third player who may or may not be considered a big. Just curious but it cant be Sanches your referring to right?
Quote from: Amaseinyourface2 on April 10, 2012, 01:37:22 PMQuote from: Moose on April 10, 2012, 01:29:02 PMQuote from: Amaseinyourface2 on April 10, 2012, 01:23:53 PMQuote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 01:06:27 PMIn honor of the SHU Rivals.com board setting odds for the Kyle Anderson recruitment I will break it down this way for Obekpa:Cincy: 45.3%SJU: 44.7%Providence: 6.75% Oregon: 3.25%Ill take those odds FWIW id rather have (assuming eligibility) Sanches, chandler, and Nolan than Obekpa. But I would still love to have ObekpaYou can't prefer Nolan to Obekpa. Obekpa is more physically mature and can provide defense at such a high level it offsets the combination of lesser defense and maybe better offense out of Nolan. No doubt Nolan is the backup plan.Haha dont tell me what I can and can't do moose. Seriously though, from what ive seen from obekpa I just think he wont be able to see the floor very much in his first year or two because he will be a big liability on offense.Also moose I saw you mention on redmen that well get a third player who may or may not be considered a big. Just curious but it cant be Sanches your referring to right?Obekpa can contribute defensively year 1 from the start. Nolan I'm not sure about either way year one. Either seems to be complimentary to Chandler who is your Center providing offense.Do you consider Sanchez a big? I do because he can play 4 as well as the 3.
Quote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 01:06:27 PMIn honor of the SHU Rivals.com board setting odds for the Kyle Anderson recruitment I will break it down this way for Obekpa:Cincy: 45.3%SJU: 44.7%Providence: 6.75% Oregon: 3.25%Assuming the validity and closeness of the numbers, what beocmes the deciding factor ? You would think both teams would have shot their load by now, unless $incy's load is a little bigger .
Sanchez / Chandler, Sanchez / Nolan likely outcomes in that order if scuttlebutt re: Obekpa true IMO. That would be ok, but I certainly prefer Obekpa in the mix. Another mid size, flexible big to play some three and four? We'll see.
Quote from: derk on April 10, 2012, 01:36:37 PMQuote from: fordham96 on April 10, 2012, 01:06:27 PMIn honor of the SHU Rivals.com board setting odds for the Kyle Anderson recruitment I will break it down this way for Obekpa:Cincy: 45.3%SJU: 44.7%Providence: 6.75% Oregon: 3.25%Assuming the validity and closeness of the numbers, what beocmes the deciding factor ? You would think both teams would have shot their load by now, unless $incy's load is a little bigger .You understand I was partly joking.
Quote from: paultzman on April 10, 2012, 01:37:56 PMSanchez / Chandler, Sanchez / Nolan likely outcomes in that order if scuttlebutt re: Obekpa true IMO. That would be ok, but I certainly prefer Obekpa in the mix. Another mid size, flexible big to play some three and four? We'll see.No chance that we can get 3 of them? Like a Chandler/Sanchez/Nolan package? Or will too many incoming post players scare one another off?
Quote from: desco80 on April 10, 2012, 01:53:11 PMQuote from: paultzman on April 10, 2012, 01:37:56 PMSanchez / Chandler, Sanchez / Nolan likely outcomes in that order if scuttlebutt re: Obekpa true IMO. That would be ok, but I certainly prefer Obekpa in the mix. Another mid size, flexible big to play some three and four? We'll see.No chance that we can get 3 of them? Like a Chandler/Sanchez/Nolan package? Or will too many incoming post players scare one another off?I think 3 is definitely possible and likely the direction staff is moving.