Pitt is an awful job in the new ACC.
Awful?
No awful is Rutgers, awful does not describe a program that went to 15 NCAA's in 17 years including 2 number 1 seeds, and several 2 ,3 seeds. It is not the best job but it is not even close to awful.
99% of your posts are disagreements. You are a contrarian.
Why is Dixon bolting Pitt now and not four years ago when TCU went after him? What's different now? Is his loyalty suddenly greater than four years ago or the time before that? He faces a stacked deck in the ACC and Pitt will NEVER be a consistent top five school in that conference with Virginia playing so well. Duke and UNC will always be head and shoulders above them and the second tier of ND, Louisville, Syracuse and NC State are far more attractive destinations. They barely finished 9th in the ACC this year and that where they would live with Dixon--worse with a lesser coach.
There is a reason schools like BC and Pitt can't hold their own in the ACC. Miami would be there too if they didn't have a ridiculous coach. Once he's gone, they are going straight to the bottom.
Pitt had two fantastic coaches over their run. Your math is off, however, as they have only made 13 NCAA appearances since 1994. They made ten straight starting 2002, but then have missed two of the last five, lost in the first round this year after squeaking in, and were blown out by 15 and 16 points in the other two years.
Their recruiting is at the lowest it's been this century and they haven't had an NBA player or realistic NBA prospect recruited since they jumped to the ACC.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittsburgh_Panthers_men%27s_basketball